As Trump Unfurls Infrastructure Plan, Iowa Bill Seeks To Criminalize Pipeline Protests

| Resist!

Above Photo: People opposing the Dakota Access pipeline gather at Standing Rock in North Dakota, December 4, 2016. Credit: Joe BruskyCC BYNC 2.0

The Iowa Senate has advanced a bill which critics say could lead to the criminalization of pipeline protests, which are being cast as “terrorist activities.” Dakota Access pipeline owner Energy Transfer Partners and other companies have lobbied for the bill, Senate Study Bill 3062, which opens up the possibility of prison time and a hefty fine for those who commit “sabotage” of critical infrastructure, such as oil and gas pipelines.

This bill, carrying a criminal punishment of up to 25 years in prison and $100,000 in fines, resembles the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, a “model” bill recently passed by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). That ALECbill, intended as a template for state and federal legislation, was based on Oklahoma’s HB 1123, which calls for citizens to receive a felony sentencing, $100,000 fine, and/or 10 years in prison if their actions “willfully damage, destroy, vandalize, deface, or tamper with equipment in a critical infrastructure facility.”

According to disclosure records, corporations lobbying for the Iowa bill include not only Energy Transfer Partners, but also Koch Industries, the American Petroleum Institute, Valero Energy, Magellan Midstream, and others. The Iowa State Police Association has also come out in support of the bill, while the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Iowa is against it. The bill has passed out of subcommittee and next goes in front of the state Senate Judiciary Committee.

The bill’s introduction comes as President Donald Trump called for Congress to pass a $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill in his State of the Union Address, which according to a leaked outline of his proposal published by The Washington Post, includes pipelines and would expedite the federal regulatory permitting process for them, largely by simply removing environmental requirements.

State Sen. Jack Shipley (R), one of the Judiciary Subcommittee “yes” votes, told the Des Moines Register that the bill was necessary “as evidenced by terrorist activities on pipelines, many many pipelines.”

Sen. Charles Schneider, who also voted to advance the bill out of subcommittee, is one of two Iowa ALEC state chairs. The other “yes” vote came from Sen. Rich Taylor, a Democrat.

ALEC is a corporate-funded group which brings together primarily Republican Party state legislators and lobbyists at annual meetings to vote on proposed “model” legislation, generally drafted by corporate lobbyists and attorneys. The Critical Infrastructure Protection Act passed through ALEC‘s Energy, Environment, and Agriculture Task Force at its States & Nation Policy Summit in December held in Nashville, Tennessee.

Energy Transfer Partners’ Iowa lobbyist, Jeff Boeyink, formerly served as chief of staff for Iowa Governor Terry Branstad, who now serves as U.S. Ambassador to China. Branstad was one of ALEC‘s key founding members in the 1970s. Energy Transfer in the past has funded ALEC meetings, though it is not clear if they are a current donor, as ALEC does not list funders on its website, nor does it make public who sponsors its meetings.

Boeyink told the Des Moines Register that he believes Energy Transfer Partners is the “poster child” showing the bill’s necessity, alluding to the months-long protests which erupted against the Dakota Access pipeline in both North Dakota and Iowa. But one of the leading opponents of the bill, Bold Iowa, has come out against the legislation and sees it as overreach.

This latest attempt by Big Oil to silence dissent is no surprise,” Ed Fallon, director of Bold Iowa, said in a press release about the bill. “This is legislative extremism at its worst. The bill’s backers want you to believe this is about cracking down on arson and vandalism. But the hundreds of pipeline protesters who were peaceful, nonviolent and didn’t engage in property destruction could be accused of interrupting service under this bill and subject to insane consequences.”

The director of ALEC‘s Energy, Environment, and Agriculture Task Force, Grant Kidwell, told DeSmog that he expects the model bill could be introduced in other states in the weeks ahead. He also pointed out that it is not only an ALEC model bill, but also one passed at the corporate-funded Council on State Governments (CSG).

Before coming to ALEC, Kidwell worked as a senior policy analyst for Americans for Prosperity, the lobbying, advocacy, and electioneering group funded and founded by money from the Koch Family Foundations and Koch Industries.

“States are recognizing the importance of critical infrastructure and the threats to it,” Kidwell told DeSmog. “Oklahoma enacted legislation in 2017 protecting critical infrastructure before ALEC began its consideration of model policy on the issue. Iowa is currently considering legislation to protect critical infrastructure and likely many more states will as well.”

Members of the Iowa-based lobbying teams for the bill, representing Koch Industries and Energy Transfer Partners, did not respond to a request for comment.

  • mwildfire

    This infrastructure really IS critical…to the companies’ bottom lines. They are pretty much all in debt; they desperately need both the 14% guaranteed profit FERC lets them take from their ratepayers to cover these projects, and the better prices they can get far away for the oil and gas–much of this is slated to go overseas. “Critical”? “Public need” to justify eminent domain? For the public, in many cases, they’ll actually pay more for gas, while those unfortunate enough to be in the path of the pipelines suddenly find that their deeds to their property give them just as many rights as the chipmunks that live on the land. Also many of those unfortunate enough to be at the intake end where the drilling and fracking take place…and sometimes at the other end, where cracking and polluting industries like plastic and chemical plants are popping up like deadly toadstools after rain. Make no mistake–there IS pipeline terrorism, folks. When the march toward utter destruction of our only world via climate change and other environmental damage goes on and on, stomping over the line of scientists crying out that we have to stop, stomping over the few who see what’s coming and are willing to stand up and do what they can to defend our planet…and they threaten us with huge fines and years in jail if we stand up–that’s TERRORISM. Sure, we can still speak out at public hearings, write letters, lobby our legislators. But I’ve been to scores of public hearings in which most citizens spoke against the various proposals, and the number of permits I’ve seen denied as a result is zero. Public hearings are a formality before the guaranteed issuance of permits–often slowed these days by lawsuits, so this bill and others proposed would remove many of the permit steps required. They are determined to ram these things through, and they own the legislatures and Congress. Yeah, you can lobby, too, and perhaps be greeted politely by people who for geographical reasons are referred to as “your representatives.” But do they represent you? How many thousands of dollars have you given these people? If less than one, you don’t count, you have no business in that building. So it comes down to physically stopping construction and lawsuits–not all the judges are on their side. Hence, making such action a felony.