Above Photo Black Lives Matter from EveryVoice.org
Note: Glen Ford, a long-time political reporter, commentator and activist who currently serves as executive editor of Black Agenda Report sees a segment of the Black Lives Matter movement getting ready to endorse one of the Democratic candidates for president and essentially cash-in their movement credentials. Ford has seen this before during earlier phases of the struggle for black liberation and how this undermines the movement and creates false black leaders who mis-lead more than lead.
We were pleased earlier in the year when Black Lives Matter announced it would not be endorsing any candidate for president. This was the wise course of action — to stay independent of the Democratic Party because throughout history, movements have died when they joined one of the two corporate political parties. Anyone who minimally watches US politics sees the corruption of the two parties and how they are funded by Wall Street and big business interests. The agenda is set by Wall Street, so if a movement aligns with the Democratic Party, they are aligning with big business interests. Refusing to endorse a presidential candidate from the two major parties was the right decision. Movements need to build their own electoral power and that will be outside of the corporate duopoly.
But now, Glen Ford reports that a small group of Black Lives Matter participants are about to pull the movement into the Democratic Party. This may benefit them personally but will not benefit the movement. It seems the principal leader of this small group is DeRay Mckesson, the former Teach for America employee who became a national spokesperson for Black Lives Matter. We have always wondered how that happened? Why did the corporate media go to DeRay? He started out merely as a twitter activist reporting on BLM, not an organizer, leader or spokesperson for the group. He has no experience in building movements or working for political change. He was able to get to BLM protests all over the country. Where did funding for that come from?
A few days ago we published an article that described how Teach For America has embedded itself in BLM. It describes Mckesson’s role in TFA as being more than a teacher, but someone who managed, hired and fired people. And, it describes how TFA helped to promote his rise in the BLM movement. But is that the whole story?
The social justice caucus within the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers wrote an open letter to DeRay Mckesson when they heard he was appearing at a forum with Teach for America. They expressed their concerns about TFA being part of the corporatization of education, the weakening of unions, the firing of black teachers and the widening racial disparity between between students and teachers. They are also critical of TFA putting in place teachers with very little training and experience; teachers who have no commitment to staying for the long haul to help build public education in Philadelphia.
African Americans make up 25% of Democratic Party primary voters so they are a very important constituency. Even with an African American president the conditions for blacks in the United States have gotten worse. Poverty has increased, wealth has decreased, the cost of college education continues to rise and African American incarceration remains disproportionately high as does police violence against African Americans. When Black Lives Matter demanded a debate on their concerns, the Demcoratic National Committee quickly agreed to a town hall forum, not a debate, where these issues could be discussed.
My hope is that those discussed in the article below do not endorse any Democrat. And, we hope is that the BLM movement does not allow any group of people to mis-lead the movement into the Democratic Party. The work BLM is doing to build a sustained and deep movement is too important to allow a few people to kill it by aligning with the Democratic Party. BLM needs to remain an independent movement working for transformation on racial justice and that cannot be done from within the power structure which needs to be challenged. Indeed, because of the importance of African Americans in the Democratic Party voting base they could be making strong demands of the Democrats who are running to ensure African American justice and advancement. The Democrats need to earn the votes of people, not assume they have the votes without doing anything. BLM should challenge the Democratic Party, not become part of it, just as it is doing with other parts of the power structure.
#BlackLivesMatter: Chat Partners With Hillary
By Glen Ford, Black Agenda Report
The #BlackLivesMatter organization is now part of the 2016 Democratic Party election machinery, assuming its role as a power broker on behalf of Black people. It’s a familiar historical pattern, except for the speed with which the transition has taken place. “The #BLM philosophy is that therapeutic dialogue with members of the power elite is politically more effective than the presentation of core demands.”
“When #BLM folks claim they have ‘lots’ of demands, it actually means they have no core demands, at all.”
The best thing that could be said about the #BlackLivesMatter Campaign Zero team is that they are an embarrassment, political tourists in the halls of empire. The truth is, however, much worse. In two meetings with Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton, they have offered no demands worthy of the name, choosing instead to imagine that they are “pushing” Clinton and the Democratic Party into some stance advantageous to Black people. In reality, the #BlackLivesMatter clique has dissipated the energy — and threat — of angry Black bodies, hands and missiles in motion in Ferguson and Baltimore. Quickly fading is the specter of a Black movement from down below that struck real fear in the Obama administration and much of the U.S. power structure. Instead, #BlackLivesMatter provides harmless chat partners for Hillary and the other presidential hopefuls.
The #BLM operatives claim they “spent months” studying Clinton’s positions on the issues, in preparation for the meeting. Why? To gauge how far they could “move” the war criminal and corporate thief? Move her towards what? Campaign Zero’s “demands” are an eclectic assortment of criminal justice reform ideas and recommendations, many of them straight out of Obama’s presidential task force on policing, and borrowed “best-practice” police procedures (Seattle is their favorite department). When #BLM folks claim they have “lots” of demands, it actually means they have no core demands, at all.
“#BlackLivesMatter provides harmless chat partners for Hillary and the other presidential hopefuls.”
The Democrats scoped them as political assets, early on: that’s why the Democratic National Committee overwhelmingly voted to “endorse” #BlackLivesMatter back in August. The trio of #BLM founders, Patrisse Cullors, Opal Tometi, and Alicia Garza, formally rejected the official DNC embrace, but the #BLM’s chat-and-tweet-squads have continued to make the Democrats look good by pretending to hold them accountable through meaningless, meandering, demand-less meetings.
DeRay Mckesson, Brittany Packnett, Johnetta Elzie, Cherno Biko and Samuel Sinyangwe provided Hillary Clinton with another useful backdrop, last week. They appear to believe their mission was to “educate” Clinton (although they would have done far better to have educated themselves on political movement history, practice and theory). “This was an opportunity to get input from black people, who are experts of their own lives, solutions to dismantling anti-black racist institutions and policies,” Johnetta Elzie told reporters. #BLM thinks that relaying the recommendations of an Obama task force to a former Obama Secretary of State equals providing “solutions to dismantling anti-black racist institutions and policies.”
“They appear to believe their mission was to ‘educate’ Clinton.”
Actually, the #BLM crew’s primary mission was to force Clinton to mentally grapple with white privilege, and to grasp how Black people “feel.” #BLM’s aim is to assure that the next president has a deeper understanding of the workings of racism — presumably, deeper than the current, Black one. In the course of the conversation, Elzie said Clinton
“…would listen and acknowledge that her experience was totally different than any of the black people at this table. It took her awhile to get there, but she got there. So I’m hopeful that she will continue to have this educational conversation with herself to acknowledge her privilege. You saying that you know that you’re white, you know that you have power, and you know that you are wealthy is not the same as seeing it and knowing that the way that police interact with you is completely different than how they will ever interact with us.”
The #BLM philosophy is that therapeutic dialogue with members of the power elite is politically more effective than the presentation of core demands. (Certainly, it is better for the future careers of the #BLM interlocutors.)
When it came to actually doing something about the Black condition, Clinton was less forthcoming. “I think she can take a harder stance on how she understands the role of the federal government in protecting the rights of people of color and pushing and modeling for local and state governments,” said DeRay Mckesson. “She kind of downplayed the role of the federal government and placed it all on state and local government,” said Johnetta Elzie.
Clinton used the meeting to announce her opposition to private prisons — which may have come as a shock to her campaign contributors from Wall Street’s corporate incarceration firms.
Elzie offered that Bernie Sanders has a better understanding of Black people’s justifiable fears of police. She and McKesson told the press they would wait to see more specifics from Clinton before deciding who to support. Cherno Biko said Clinton “hasn’t earned my endorsement yet, but I’m looking forward to her releasing a racial justice platform in the coming weeks.” Brittany Packnett emerged from the meeting “still thinking about where I will put my vote and not yet having an answer.”
“The #BLM crowd milked the incipient movement for all it was worth.”
They will all endorse one of the Democrats, sooner rather than later. The #BlackLivesMatter tent has already been folded up inside the Democratic Party, where slick Black “activists” on the make go to catch the express elevator to the executive suites. In less than a year, the #BLM crowd milked the incipient movement for all it was worth, presenting themselves as the interlocutors between the streets and Power. It’s been one hell of a journey — a great hustle. They have arrived at where they wanted to be: part of the age-old Black Petit Bourgeois Shuffle, dancing to the Master’s tune, while complaining that their pale partners still don’t have the right rhythm.
The demand from the streets remains the same as it has been since the imposition of the modern Black mass incarceration regime, two generations ago: Black community control of the police — by any means necessary. The Black Is Back Coalition for Social Justice, Peace and Reparations will rally and march on the White House on Saturday, November 7 — as it has every year since 2009 — under the banner “Black Power Matters.”
The demand for Black community control of police is called forth by both the principle of self-determination and the facts of Black existence in the United States. But self-determination does not exist in the practice of #BlackLivesMatter, which has squandered Black people’s dignity and the momentum of an emerging movement.
We wish them a swift and complete assimilation into the corridors of Power — which was their mission, all along.
BAR executive editor GlenFord can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.