Extreme Measures Needed To Tackle Climate Chaos Before It’s Too Late

| Create!

This originally appeared via RT.com as an op-ed.

While Some Politicians Move To Address The Cascading And Unequal Effects Of Climate Change In The US, Two Direct Action Endeavors Show The Power And Need For More Pointed Efforts Outside The Legislative Sphere.

The last week in July saw record-breaking temperatures across the globe. The forecast map for Europe appeared as a giant oppressive red mass with barely any orange or yellow nuance. Not built to withstand temperatures in the triple digits fahrenheit, cities such as Stockholm, Paris, Berlin, and elsewhere boiled beneath an unrelenting summer sun.

Here in the US, cities across the country sent out advisories telling residents to stay inside with air conditioning on. And while three-quarters of homes in the US have air conditioning, high-risk, low-income communities sometimes don’t, and even if they do, they don’t always have access to it. For instance, a mere few days after Mayor de Blasio signed an executive order declaring a state of emergency due to extreme temperatures, nearly 50,000 Con Edison customers had their power cut. The company cited necessary repairs and the need to protect its equipment but failed to comment on the fact that their cut targeted neighborhoods that both ranked 4 out of 5 on the heat vulnerability index and are predominantly communities of color. Similarly back in May, PG&E sent out letters to its electricity customers alerting them to possible 5-day long power outages depending on fire conditions. Their shut-off letter came not long after news broke that PG&E was responsible for the deadly Camp Fire that ravaged Butte County in Northern California in 2018, killing 85. An old PG&E high-voltage transmission line was pinpointed as the origin and investigations into PG&E company documents show that the company knew that this and about 100 other transmission lines needed to be repaired, some being almost 100 years old. Yet, they did nothing. And now, as PG&E has filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy, they are under no obligation to fix the remaining fire hazard lines, but can instead place the burden of their malfeasance on customers, many of whom need electricity for health and medical reasons.

Here in the great corporatocracy that is the US, it’s not unusual for companies to brush off gross wrongdoings, particularly when it mostly impacts poor, disabled, black, and brown communities.

As the effects of climate change become more and more pronounced, the corruption and systemic bigotry of the US political system will only become more obvious and tangible. Of course, there are ways to address this.

Just before the August recess, Senator Kamala Harris and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced the Climate Equity Act, a bill that would require a special congressional review of legislation through the lens of so-called frontline communities.

In a broad sense, frontline communities are those who experience disproportionately acute effects of both climate and economic policy. This includes black, brown, indigenous, disabled, LGBTQ2S, and other violently marginalized folks. It includes those who suffer most from pollution and environmental destruction and who find their neighborhoods marked as primary sacrifice zones for new dirty energy and industrial projects.

By connecting such frontline communities to the issue of climate justice, this bill highlights an important intersection between climate chaos, income inequality, and race in the US. That being said, it is important to not place too much hope or trust in the legislative path to climate justice. Both because of the inherently slow legislative process and the deep-rooted corruption of our system, direct action must be the primary focus of mitigating climate chaos.

For instance, roughly 200 miles north of San Francisco, California, in the Mattole River watershed, a battle to protect some of the last old growth forests in the region is intensifying.

Since early June, a tree-sitter has been living in an old growth Douglas fir on Rainbow Ridge, a key logging area, attaching lines to neighboring trees to stop them from being felled by the Humboldt Redwood Company (HRC).

Meanwhile, solidarity actions on the ground have blocked logging vehicles and workers while exposing the hypocrisy of HRC, a company that claims their industrial logging is “sustainable.” In reality, HRC not only logs old growth trees, a practice they claim to avoid due to sustainability reasons, but also practices a method of forestry known as hack-and-squirt. This refers to hacking around the base of an undesirable tree and then spraying pesticides into the opening.

The goal is to get rid of trees that aren’t economically viable and make room for tree farms that consist of tightly-packed rows of, typically, one type of tree. This practice is not only unsustainable, it decimates complex ecosystems through the use of pesticides and the construction of monoculture greenery that can not sustain diverse plant and animal life.

Meanwhile, the dead or dying tree carcasses left in the wake of hack-and-squirt operations provide astonishingly dangerous kindling for wildfires in a state that has experienced two straight years of record-breaking forest fires. Indeed, apart from providing buffers against wildfires, natural and old growth forests act as heat sinks for extreme temperatures, clean the air, and provide us with that most precious and mistreated element, oxygen. In other words, the direct action work of blocking logging access and protecting these trees in the Mattole is vital. It is immediate, resolute and side-steps the pandering between industry and government.

Similarly, in the Appalachian Mountains of Virginia, the group Appalachians Against Pipelines are employing direct action tactics to stop construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, a proposed 303-mile fracked gas pipeline that would run from Northwestern West Virginia to Southern Virginia. The project would produce the equivalent of 26-coal fired power plants in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. As noted in their mission statement, “After years of organizing to stop the MVP, in February of 2018 as tree clearing began, people were left with no choice but to take to the trees to defend Peters Mountain and the Jefferson National Forest.”

In late July, as protectors marked day 319 of the tree-sit, over 30 people blocked work at a site in Cove Hollow. Close to the tree-sit, three protectors were arbitrarily and violently arrested. This kind of aggressive pushback from law enforcement and dirty energy security (who are often one and the same) is common at every front line and direct action effort. Incidentally, this proves the efficacy of the tactic.

As of now, trees marked for destruction in the Mattole and along the path of the Mountain Valley Pipeline are still standing. Every day they stand is a small victory for people and planet.

Ultimately, we can not sit back and hope that our politicians will act correctly or quickly enough to tackle the climate chaos that we are already experiencing. We simply don’t have that luxury of time. Legislation regarding climate justice should be simple: if it’s a dirty energy project, the answer is ‘no.’ If it’s pointlessly destructive, particularly regarding fragile ecosystems and necessary barriers to climate chaos and deforestation, the answer is ‘no.’ If it puts lives at risk for the sake of corporate profit in a dying environment, the answer is always ‘no.’ Unfortunately, the bill put forward by Ocasio-Cortez and Harris does not have this kind of streamlined urgency.

It might sound like an extreme stance to take, but having experienced the heatwaves in both Europe and the US this summer, I can say that the only extremism we need to worry about is the extreme danger of doing too little, too late.

Endeavors like those happening in Northern California and Virginia are but two examples of the global efforts to slash emissions, restructure our energy economy, and build climate justice in the midst of climate chaos. Through solidarity, diversity of tactics, and pointed resolve, we can use events like the recent oppressive heatwaves in both Europe and the US as jumping-off points for collaborative work, rather than apathetic despair.

 

Help keep independent and radical journalism alive: become a patron of my work!

  • Greeley Miklashek

    Too many humans using too many natural resources and producing too much pollution. Population density stress is killing us NOW! We refuse to embrace our own shadow, the harm to the natural environment that is resulting from too many humans. ONLY a worldwide, concerted drive to limit family size to one or none can save the earth and posterity from extinction. BirthStrike. Stress R Us Go Bernie and Elizabeth!

  • mwildfire

    We need a global one-child policy to save us in the long run, but in the short run we need to drastically cut emissions. We can’t wait for our numbers to slowly fall.

  • Greeley Miklashek

    The only argument between me and my environmentalist friends, like you, is what will kill us first: population density stress and its “diseases of civilization” (55% of American adults now have at least one, and 80% of us over 50!) or climate collapse. I’m taking bets, if you’re looking for some action! Go Bernie and Elizabeth!

  • mwildfire

    I don’t think this is gonna work. Kill whom? Individuals? All of humanity? Hard to arrange the payoff, either way. Besides, it doesn’t work that way–the Three Horsemen of the Apocalypse, always work cooperatively. Excess humans are a reason climate change and other environmental problems are spiraling out of control, but not the only reason. If people die in a famine, is it because there were too many people relying on a poor harvest, or was it that the harvest was poor because of the drought, and was the drought due to climate change or would have happened anyway? What about the people who fled the drought and either drowned in the Mediterranean or were shot trying to cross a border? How about the people who got a dangerous plague going in a filthy refugee camp, exacerbated by malnutrition in part caused by that drought, and the camp is so overcrowded because people heard about the people who got shot trying to cross the border so they stayed at the camp instead of trying for the border themselves…and the violence in the country they failed to get into, ostensibly over religious conflict but spurred by an underlying awareness that there is not enough to go around, not to mention the awareness that those best fixed to survive all this are those who did the most to cause the problems? And now that plague is spreading to new countries, carried by soldiers in a resource war. And the plague is new reason for borders to be slammed shut. You can ascribe any of these deaths to whichever cause you like but in the real world most things are multifactorial in cause.

  • Greeley Miklashek

    And your question was? Lots of supportive evidence for the killing forces of overpopulation. Thanks for that.

  • ANTONIO

    Here is an old idea that has no currency, but I believe that it is the key to existence: Plants are our mothers and fathers. First there were plants, then herbivores, then carnivores, then omnivores (us). We live, then we die. Do we go to heaven? What nonsense. We go into the ground and rot- just take a look. That rotting makes the soil fertile, and a seed that is in the ground will sprout, thanks to us. Thus plants are our children and our ancestors at the same time. We are all part of an eternal cycle. Without plants there would be no animals (us).

  • Greeley Miklashek

    “I don’t think this is gonna work.” Tell it to Mother Nature; She’s in charge not me or you.

  • mwildfire

    I meant your bet. How are you going to collect, if the question is what’s gonna kill us first (us as individuals, or humanity?) And my other question is how you decide what killed us when it’s so multifactorial, when climate change and overpopulation produce famine, which exacerbates conflict and violence, which make agriculture even harder, all of which increase the likelihood and spread of plagues, which also create anti-immigrant violence, etc.

  • Greeley Miklashek

    I’m 74 and I’ve had a fabulous life, been around the world, cared for 25,000 suffering souls, written several books, known many interesting folks, spent many wonderful days camping in nature, etc. I’m a Cassandra now, just trying to warn others of what’s happening and what’s coming soon, if we don’t dramatically lower our consumption of natural resources and our reproduction (230,000 net/day presently). Honestly, I have almost no hope that folks will listen or amend our behavior, but I promised my patients I’d write the book, “Stress R Us” and give it away, which I have. Your “multifactorial ” comment is accurate. Malthus, in 1798, said “misery and vice” awaited us if we kept doubling our population in the US every 20-30 years, but we did it anyway. Good Luck!