Largest Oil-by-Rail Terminal In U.S. Defeated By Tribal And Environmental Coalition

| Resist!

Above Photo: From lastrealindians.com

*Editors note.  [update] On January 29th, 2018 Washington State Governor Jay Inslee rejected the permit. 

Olympia, WA – On November 28th, the Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council dealt a major blow to a proposed massive oil-by-rail terminal along the Columbia river along the Washington and Oregon borders.

The council voted unanimously to “recommended disapproval of Vancouver Energy application’s to build a crude-by-rail oil terminal at the Port of Vancouver.”

The council stated that, “developers had not met their burden to show that the proposed port of Vancouver site was acceptable.” High among concerns were derailments and explosions. In 2016, an oil train derailed along the Columbia river Gorge that promoted the evacuation in the town of Mosier Oregon.

The company, Vancouver Energy, has been seeking approval to build the nation’s largest oil-by-rail terminal at the Port of Vancouver. If built, the $210 million terminal would bring on average “360,000 barrels of oil per day from crude oil [from the Bakken Shale] unit trains into marine vessels in the Columbia River bound for refineries along the West Coast.”

The terminal has been widely opposed by cities, environmentalists and Columbia River Treaty tribes.

The council, who started its review process in 2013, was inundated with over 250,000 public comments with the bulk opposing the construction of the terminal.

This decision comes among a series of successful campaigns led by Tribe’s and environmentalists to stop proposed fossil fuel projects in the Northwest.

In January 2017, the Quinualt Nation led a successful campaign to stop proposed oil-by-rail terminals from being built in Grays Harbor. In the spring of 2016, the Lummi Nation helped lead a campaign to stop the construction of what would have been the largest coal export terminal in the nation.

Fawn Sharp President Quinault Nation leading an action against proposed oil by rail terminal. Photo by Marles Black Bird

Healing pole carved by Jewell James (Lummi) traveled from South Dakota to Alberta Tar Sands to bring communities together in fight against coal and oil exports.

Each campaign has seen a successful partnership between Tribe’s, regional Native activists, environmentalists, and local jurisdictions working together to halt massive fossil fuel projects.

The efforts coming out of the Northwest demonstrate that you can successfully merge the concerns of Tribe’s with environmentalists and local jurisdictions to craft successful campaigns to halt these treaty breaking, environmentally destruction fossil fuel projects. It can be exhausting, but it is absolutely critically, to be engaged in every step of the process to combat the fossil fuel industry.

They are relentless, but so are we, and we will remain vigilant and laser focused in protecting our lands, waters, treaty rights and well being of Earth.” ~Matt Remle co-founder Mazaska Talks

Quinault Indian Nation Vice President Tyson Johnston (center) marching at the Break Free Indigenous Peoples march with Matt Remle at March Point to oppose a proposed Shell refinery. photo by Alex Garland

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    The council voted unanimously to “recommended disapproval of Vancouver Energy application’s to build a crude-by-rail oil terminal at the Port of Vancouver.”

    Recommended?

    So who makes the actual decision? What is the situation there? Should lawyers be recruited?

  • Jon

    Good catch,Tecumseh. I clicked on the live link and learned more. Note that this report was done in No., and it was to be delivered to the governonr by late December. From what I gathered, there is significant opposition to this gigantic plan, so the governor would be bucking substantial opposiotion, but of course that has often not been a barrier for corporate interests. What happened in Dec, we don’t know from this report. I think I read elsewhere that the opposition actually won.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Thanks! But I missed on something. I didn’t do a search on “oil terminal at the Port of Vancouver”, which I did just now and came up with:

    Inslee rejects Port of Vancouver oil terminal

    By Pete Danko – Staff Reporter, Portland Business Journal

    Jan 29, 2018

    “Washington Gov. Jay Inslee on Monday drove another stake into the battered heart of Vancouver Energy, the giant oil-by-rail terminal proposed for the Port of Vancouver.

    Inslee concurred with the unanimous decision of energy facility siting regulators to reject the Tesoro Corp.-Savage Cos. project, citing the risk of a catastrophic earthquake, oil spills in the Columbia River and fires or explosions.”

    [snip]

    “Vancouver Energy has 30 days to appeal Inslee’s decision. A spokesman said the company expected to put out a statement later Monday. This story will be updated when it arrives.”

    ~ https://www.bizjournals.COM/portland/news/2018/01/29/inslee-rejects-port-of-vancouver-oil-terminal.html

    Who do they appeal it to? This Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council
    that Inslee wrote a letter to?

  • Jon

    Thanks for the update, but cautiously there’s a win for the good guys.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Right!

    Here’s where a guy that did color revolutions for the CIA is celebrated.

    https://popularresistance.ORG/gene-sharp-godfather-of-nonviolent-revolution-dies-at-90-years-old/

  • spixleatedlifeform

    Sorry for a 3-month delay. Just came across a link (from here*) to this article you and Jon commented to.

    * https://www.nationofchange.org/2018/04/22/earth-day-conflict-over-the-future-of-the-planet/

    Here’s what The Columbian (Vancouver, WA’s local newspaper) wrote about Inslee’s decision:

    “Vancouver Energy now has 30 days to appeal Inslee’s decision in Thurston County Superior Court.”

    http://www.columbian.com/news/2018/jan/29/inslee-rejects-vancouver-energy-oil-terminal/

    The decision by Vancouver energy regarding any appeal is here:

    https://washingtonstatewire.com/vancouver-energy-ends-effort-build-oil-terminal-along-columbia-river/

    From one of the resident locals (me) who has been opposed to these WA and OR fossil fuel terminals since they were originally supposed to be IMPORT terminals, not export terminals. My! how time changes what the money wants, eh? It’s NEVER satisfied.

    Did the fossil fuel industry get the message? I can’t tell but the price of a gallon of gasoline here is now about 20-25% higher since the decision, than the current national average. (It is normally 10-15% higher.#)

    # https://gasprices.aaa.com/

    Funny how all this alleged fossil fuel exporting (oil, coal and natural gas — crude OR refined) is supposed to make the US energy independent. Certainly goes against everything conservatives preach about the laws of supply:demand dictating the prices of everything. If I live to a thousand I’ll never understand what constitutes logic to any conservative. Perhaps I … or they … are really from a different universe?

    By the way, Thurston County is NOT on or near the Columbia River, Vancouver, WA or SW Washington. It’s the county where the state capital is located, Olympia.

    SPLF

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Thanks for thinking of me. I was happy to read the results in your references.