Lawsuit Charges FDA Ignored Safety Warnings About GMO Salmon

Print Friendly

Above Photo: GMO salmon eggs at an AquaBounty facility in Waltham, Massachusetts. (photo: Barcroft USA/Getty Images)

Consumer, fisheries, and environmental groups have sued the agency over its approval of AquaBounty’s product.

he controversy over genetically engineered salmon is headed to court.

Several environmental, consumer, and fishing groups filed suit on Thursday against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration over its approval of a lab-developed fish that combines genes from three fish species: Atlantic salmon, Chinook salmon, and Arctic eelpout.

The lawsuit contends that the FDA ignored advice from federal fisheries and wildlife scientists to delay or deny the application and made the approval “without disclosing or analyzing the significant environmental effects from this foreseeable expansion.”

These effects include the potential for the genetically engineered salmon to escape into the ocean and interbreed with wild salmon, compete with native fish for food and habitat, and spread infectious diseases that incubate in crowded fish farms.

Many wild salmon species are endangered. But the FDA failed to complete consultations with federal agencies that enforce the Endangered Species Act, the lawsuit charges.

The engineered salmon, developed by the Boston-based AquaBounty Technologies, reaches maturity in about half the time of its naturally evolved cousins, and on less food, making it more profitable for fish farmers.

AquaBounty spokesperson Dave Conley said the company plans to produce salmon only in facilities located on land to prevent their escape and interbreeding with other fish.

Under the plan approved by the FDA in November, the company will produce genetically engineered eggs at a facility on Canada’s Prince Edward Island and fly them to a location in Panama, where they will hatch and mature before eventually being exported to the United States.

Jaydee Hanson, senior policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety, which filed the lawsuit jointly with Earthjustice, the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Food & Water Watch, the Center for Biological Diversity, and several other organizations, said the egg-producing facility on Prince Edward Island was problematic.

“I have been to the facility. It’s 120 feet from the sound, and that’s not deep inland,” Hanson said. “Prince Edward Island has been hit by large hurricanes in the past, similar to [superstorm] Sandy, and the whole facility could be washed out.”

Hanson said the company has claimed there are no wild salmon in the waters off Prince Edward Island, but he said federal researchers found Atlantic salmon within a mile of the facility.

Aside from the new legal challenge, marketing the hybrid fish, at least in the United States, still faces some hurdles.

In February, the FDA issued an import ban on genetically modified salmon until labeling standards can be established, following a directive passed by Congress late last year. The ban effectively makes it impossible to stock and sell the salmon in the U.S. in the near term.

Several polls show that the vast majority of American consumers want genetically modified foods to be labeled as such.

Meanwhile, last November, the retail giant Costco said it will not sell genetically modified fish, joining supermarket chains such as Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, Safeway, and Kroger in promising not to sell the genetically modified fish, according to environmental group Friends of the Earth.

George Kimbrell, senior attorney at the Center for Food Safety, called AquaBounty’s plan to produce eggs in Canada and raise the fish in Panama “a smokescreen to try to crack open regulatory doors to produce genetically engineered salmon in other places, including the United States.”

According to an email exchange from 2011 between National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration staff members, obtained by the Center for Food Safety under the Freedom of Information Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has received “several requests from companies” in the U.S. to import eggs from AquaBounty’s gene-engineered salmon.

When asked to comment on the lawsuit, AquaBounty’s Conley provided a link to aFactcheck.org article, which noted that based “on research primarily conducted by AquaBounty scientists and consultations with independent researchers,” the FDA found that “GE salmon is not likely to pose a risk to the health and safety of humans or wild salmon populations.”

Under the plan greenlit by the FDA, according to FactCheck.org, AquaBounty will only produce sterile female fish that cannot interbreed with other salmon.

But according to the lawsuit, the FDA has acknowledged that up to 5 percent of the salmon produced in Canada may not be sterile.

In response to a request for comment, FDA spokesperson Juli Putnam stated in an email that the agency does not comment on matters related to pending litigation.

  • Jon

    Remember Jurassic Park : “Life will find a way.” Or, put another way, paraphrasing, If you create them, they will find a way to breed.” Don’t!

  • Pingback: Lawsuit Charges FDA Ignored Safety Warnings About GMO Salmon  | Janet's Good News()

  • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

    This is a very important story.

  • Chazz A

    The scary thing about this salmon is that small samples of the fish showed 40 percent higher rates of a hormones linked to cancer and 20 to 50 percent higher allergenic rates, according to FDA testing. Yet they claim this thing is fit for consumption! Also, the FDA is rating Aquabounty’s salmon as a drug, not a food!

  • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

    This is why people want the labeling of GMO foods. Even in 2016, it is taboo for some to publicly criticize dangerous toxins in foods. Some people want to use even dangerous chemicals in foods as a way to cut corners, but that allows an increase of risk factors. This important news should be shown everywhere.

  • Chazz A

    Right. This news should be broadcast around the globe. I’ve researched GMO’s and Monsanto in order to get a better understanding and I’ve read some alarming data, specifically from independent scientists.
    There are a number of countries that have banned Monsanto including France, Japan, Germany and many others. Yet, the talking heads in this country tell us theres no need for concern.

  • truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com

    I agree. I have heard of the Green Party and other independent people talking about GMOs and Monsanto. Yet, the corporate media refuses to even show a discussion on this issue since Monsanto and other companies have funded media engines and other corporate power bases in the West. Many European nations including Japan have banned Monsanto. I can’t fathom why anyone would want to refuse to even label GMO products. Scientific studies, books, and other research have refuted the false notion that GMO products are infallible.

  • Chazz A

    Yes indeed.