Mass Unemployment Is A Failure Of Capitalism

| Educate!

Above photo: From Linked In.

Part of the wealth produced by those who are still employed must be redistributed away from them and to the unemployed.

The difficulties caused to workers by record unemployment during the pandemic are a product of capitalism. Most of the time, employers decide to hire or fire workers depending on which choice maximizes employers’ profits. Profit, not the full employment of workers nor of means of production, is “the bottom line” of capitalism and thus of capitalists. That is how the system works. Capitalists are rewarded when their profits are high and punished when they are not. It’s nothing personal; it’s just business.

Unemployment is a choice mostly made by employers. In many cases of unemployment, employers had the option not to fire employees. They could have kept all employed but reduced their hours or days or else rotated off-work times among employees. Employers can choose to retain idled employees on payrolls and suffer losses they hope will be temporary.

However, unemployment is received almost everywhere and by almost all as a negative, unwanted experience. Workers want jobs. Employers want employees producing profitable output. Governments want the tax revenues that flow from employees and employers actively collaborating.

So why has the capitalist system periodically produced economic downturns wherever it has settled across the last three centuries? They have happened, on average, every four to seven years. The United States has had three crashes so far this century: “dot-com” in 2000; “sub-prime mortgage” in 2008; and now “coronavirus” in 2020. Thus the United States conforms to capitalism’s “norm.” Capitalists do not want unemployment, but they regularly generate it. It is a basic contradiction of their system.

There are good reasons why capitalism produces and reproduces unemployment over time. It draws benefits (as well as suffers losses) from doing so. Reproducing a “reserve army of the unemployed” enables periodic upsurges in capital investment to draw more employees without driving up wages. Rising wages—and thus falling profits—would accompany investment surges if all workers were already fully employed before such surges. Unemployment also disciplines the working class. The unemployed, often desperate to get jobs, give employers the opportunity to replace existing employees with unemployed candidates willing to work for less. Unemployment thus operates as a downward pressure on wages and salaries and thereby a boost for profits. In short, capitalism both wants and does not want unemployment; it expresses this tension by periodically adding to and drawing down a reserve army of the unemployed that it continually maintains.

That reserve army exposes a stark reality that no ideological gloss ever fully erases. While unemployment serves capitalism, it does not well serve society. That key difference is most glaringly in evidence when unemployment is very high, as it is today. Consider that today’s many unemployed millions continue much of their consumption while ceasing much of their production. While they continue to take their means of consumption from socially produced wealth, they no longer produce nor thereby add to social wealth as they did when employed.

Unemployment thus entails wealth redistribution. Part of the wealth produced by those who are still employed must be redistributed away from them and to the unemployed. Taxes accomplish that redistribution publicly. Employees and employers, labor and capital struggle over whose taxes will fund the consumption of the unemployed. Such redistribution struggles can be and often are bitter and socially divisive. In the private sphere of households, portions of the incomes and wealth of the employed likewise get redistributed to enable consumption by the unemployed: spouses share, as do parents and children, relatives, friends, and neighbors. Working classes always redistribute their incomes and wealth to cope with the unemployment capitalism so regularly imposes on them. Such redistributions typically cause or aggravate many tensions and conflicts within the working class.

Many public and private redistribution struggles could be avoided if, for example, public re-employment replaced private unemployment. If the state became the employer of last resort, those fired by private employers could immediately be rehired by the state to do socially useful work. Governments would stop paying unemployment benefits and instead pay wages to the re-employed, obtain in return real goods and services, and distribute them to the public. The 1930s New Deal did exactly that for millions fired by private employers. A similar alternative to private capitalist employment and unemployment (but not part of the New Deal) would be to organize the unemployed into worker co-op enterprises performing socially useful work on contract with the government.

This last alternative is the best because it could develop a new worker-co-op sector of the U.S. economy. That would provide the U.S. public with direct experience in comparing the capitalist with the worker-co-op sector in terms of working conditions, product quality and price, civic responsibility, etc. On that concrete, empirical basis, societies could offer people a real, democratic choice as to what mix of capitalist and worker-co-op sectors of the economy they prefer.

Richard D. Wolff is professor of economics emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a visiting professor in the Graduate Program in International Affairs of the New School University, in New York.

This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

  • OmniaQuaerite

    From Wolff’s own description, unemployment is more of a goal of capitalism than a failure. I do like the idea of worker cooperatives, though.

  • SteelPirate

    Compromise for pelf and power has been the one great weapon of the capitalists even in their own day of struggle against the then economic and ruling class. It is a weapon and a means whereby they seduce the rebellious spirit of the workers. A time serving policy. They have cause to fear and dread at the rule of labor. It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for the every day struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on production when capitalism shall have been over-thrown.

    –Joe Ettor

  • Cab Driver xxx

    Lol. My new comments are now shadow banned over at “anti-empire.” Their twist on it though is to allow the older postings to stand while automatically deleting the new ones. Unreal.

  • Hey – seems they are having tech glitches there. Mine have been automatically going into “pending” and eventually get released. But this am, one I wrote didn’t show up in my comments at all right away, and then awhile later, it appeared as “pending” (on my comment feed) so it will probably show up (get posted) in due course.

    Maybe you are caught up in the same…

  • Cab Driver xxx

    Yes. I see that. Thx, nb.
    After all that madness and gaslighting my paranoia kicks in pretty quick. Lol.

  • Yep. Mine too. LoL… It is a PITA of course and turns us into paranoid freaks after awhile, but overall, all good. 🙂

  • 0040

    People are desperate to eat and have sheller not to slave for the elites ! The idea that people want to work in servitude to others is the basis of this article and it is clearly not true. Left to our own devices most of us would prefer to be “unemployed” .Unfortunately all of todays economists and political operatives believe otherwise, be they devotees of Adam Smith or Karl Marx . The first casualty of materialism , regardless of the system chosen , is equality.

  • iowapinko

    Imagine a govt that functioned to serve the needs of the people.We
    have never experienced anything of this sort in the U$, so it might be
    challenging………

    This quarantine period could be
    used to employ workers to construct new water systems in our old
    industrial cities where lead pipes and contaminated water are killing
    people.

    We could re-establish the CCC (Civilian
    Conservation Corp) to clean our environment, plant trees, revamp our
    national park system.

    A new generation WPA could establish a mass transit system, restore crumbling infrastructure, create new public spaces.

    The people, unchained and untethered, could imagine us out of our current nightmare and into a glorious new world. It is in our hands.

  • Collectivist

    Lol

  • Edge Bender

    Is it not tragic that you are not alone in being able to explain the fibers of an indifferent social-economic system? Where that has been so vividly obvious for as long as it has, what can have become of the organizing ability that rises from informed economics? How can the affirmation of indifference be so well established in a world at the pretense of civilized?

  • Mensch59

    The people, unchained and untethered, could imagine us out of our current nightmare and into a glorious new world. It is in our hands.

    Imagining a new world is great. So is rebelling against the old order. What does this old order actually look like when we’re not afraid to stare the sociopaths in the face?

    Now, dear reader, I know you’re not a member of an institutionally sociopathic elite caste, trying to extend your power back to the good old days of supreme monarchs ordained by God himself.

    But imagine you were.

    “10 Steps to Turn a Pandemic into the Brave New Normal” by Catte Black