New Netanyahu “Peace” Plan Is Straight Out Of Apartheid South Africa

Print Friendly

Above Photo: Palestinian citizens of Israel march against home demolitions in Arara, a town in the Wadi Ara region that Netanyahu wants transferred to a Palestinian entity, January 2017. Keren ManorActiveStills

Benjamin Netanyahu is proposing that Palestinian citizens of Israel be stripped of their citizenship under a “peace” deal that would place them in a future Palestinian entity.

The Israeli prime minister recently told American officials, according to a report in Haaretz, that “Israeli-Arab communities could move under Palestinian control” as part of a final status agreement.

“In exchange,” the Tel Aviv newspaper wrote, “Israel would annex some West Bank settlements.”

Commonly referred to as “transfer,” this proposal amounts to ethnic cleansing. It is not a new idea, but Netanyahu’s broaching it represents a further step in the Israeli government formally adopting policies once considered taboo even by many Israelis.

The area Netanyahu has in mind – at least initially – is Wadi Ara, a region in the north, including the major town of Umm al-Fahm.

Some 1.5 million Palestinians have citizenship in Israel. They are the survivors and their descendants of the Nakba, the Zionist ethnic cleansing of the vast majority of the Palestinian population from what became Israel before and after it was established in 1948.

The idea that this would be an “exchange” is clearly absurd since none of what Netanyahu proposes to swap is Israel’s to begin with: West Bank settlers live on land stolen from Palestinians in violation of international law.

Meanwhile, the rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel – who in any such move would be deprived of the right of determining their own fate on land that is theirs by birth – are not a gift from Israel, which was established by force and conquest in their country at their expense.

So-called population exchanges have an ugly history; they were practiced before the modern era, when it was accepted that rulers treated people like property.

But the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other norms enshrined after the atrocities of the Second World War vested rights in individuals and outlawed forced displacement and the arbitrary removal of citizenship and nationality.

But as I argued in my 2014 book The Battle for Justice in Palestine, Israel’s claim that it has a “right to exist as a Jewish state” cannot be realized without the massive and constant violation of the most basic principles of human rights, equality and anti-racism.

Apartheid logic

This can be seen by following the logic of Netanyahu’s proposal. He talks about the transfer as part of a “final status” deal.

But what kind of a “peace” would Netanyahu contemplate? In his first White House meeting with US President Donald Trump in February, the Israeli leader would not commit explicitly to any sort of “two-state solution.”

He insisted though that in any deal Palestinians must recognize Israel as a “Jewish state” and Israel “must retain overriding security control over the entire area west of the Jordan River.”

So adding all the elements together, Netanyahu’s plan would take Palestinians in Israel, who currently possess rights as citizens – albeit limited by law and inferior to Jews – and move them to a situation where like the rest of the Palestinians under perpetual Israeli military occupation they would have no rights at all.

In March, a landmark UN report concluded that “Israel has established an apartheid regime that dominates the Palestinian people as a whole.”

“The mission of preserving Israel as a Jewish state has inspired or even compelled Israel to pursue several general racial policies,” the report states. These include “demographic engineering, in order to establish and maintain an overwhelming Jewish majority in Israel.”

Netanyahu’s latest proposal precisely fits into this mold, and therefore is further confirmation that Israel practices apartheid.

The UN report also noted that while Israel maintains a formal democratic system for citizens of the state, it prohibits anyone from using that system to challenge the regime’s fundamentally racist set-up: “Israeli law bans organized Palestinian opposition to Jewish domination, rendering it illegal and even seditious.”

Netanyahu would do away with the merest threat of Palestinian citizens of Israel using their votes to challenge this domination by stripping them of their citizenship.

Bantustans

The UN report, quickly suppressed by the UN secretary-general on American orders, stresses that it does not directly compare Israel to apartheid South Africa.

Rather, it measures Israel against the definition of the crime of apartheid in international law, which is includedin the founding statute of the International Criminal Court.

Netanyahu’s proposal does nonetheless indeed follow closely the precedent set by apartheid South Africa.

As that racist regime came under increasing pressure to end white supremacist rule in the late 20th century, it created a system of “bantustans” – nominally independent Black-ruled states.

If Black people wanted to vote, the apartheid government said, they were welcome to take citizenship in one of the bantustans – impoverished strips of land stretched across remote areas of South Africa.

But the “independence” of these states – not recognized by any country – was a total sham. They were tin-pot dictatorships run by collaborators with the white racist regime.

The bantustans were a mechanism to remove Black people physically – by encouraging or forcing migration to them – and politically from South Africa, while providing no real rights.

It is difficult to find any difference with what Netanyahu – who has made clear his aversion to seeing Palestinian citizens of Israel vote – is proposing.

There is one key difference: unlike with apartheid South Africa whose bantustans met universal rejection, many in the so-called international community, including Barack Obama when he was president, have eagerly adopted Israel’s racist and segregationist conception under the slogan of “two states for two peoples.”

Guaranteeing supremacy

The idea of racial gerrymandering has found favor with some of Israel’s most ardent admirers.

Henry Kissinger, the former US secretary of state who has a long list of war crimes on his record including the killing of millions of people in Southeast Asia, advised Israel in 2004 to “transfer territory with significant Arab populations from the northern part of Israel to improve the demographic balance.”

In recent years, there have been two main Israeli proponents of the idea of further ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, marketed as “land swaps.”

Avigdor Lieberman, the West Bank settler who is currently Israel’s defense minister, has long advocated this approach.

A decade ago Lieberman said he would support a “two-state solution” as long as it provided for real segregation by getting rid of Palestinian citizens of Israel.

“The guiding principle must be an exchange of territory and of populations,” he said. “It’s not that we’re against the solution of two states for two peoples,” Lieberman added. “On the contrary, we support it: two states for two peoples, not a state and a half for one people and half a state for the other.”

In Lieberman’s view, the risk of a two-state solution without transfer was that Israel would end up as “half a state” – meaning that Jews could not guarantee their domination in an entity with more than 1.5 million non-Jewish citizens who expect equal democratic and civil rights.

Lieberman recently reaffirmed in a posting on Facebook that the Jewish state should eventually be ethnically cleansed of virtually all Palestinians.

“There is no reason why Sheikh Raed Salah, Ayman Odeh, Basel Ghattas or Haneen Zoabi should continue to be Israeli citizens,” he said in reference to prominent Palestinian politicians, three of them at the time members of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset.

Third Nakba?

The other key proponent is Tzipi Livni, the ostensibly “dovish” former foreign minister who is sought for questioning in war crimes inquiries by prosecutors in several countries.

In 2007, Livni said: “The Palestinian state to be established will not be a solution just for the Palestinians who live in Judea and Samaria [the West Bank]. It is designed to provide a comprehensive national solution – for those living in Judea and Samaria, and the refugees camps, and even for the [Arab] citizens of Israel.”

As part of the government of Ehud Olmert the same year, Livni formally raised the idea of transfer with Palestinian negotiators, explaining: “Our idea is to refer to two states for two peoples. Or two nation states, Palestine and Israel living side by side in peace and security with each state constituting the homeland for its people and the fulfillment of their national aspirations and self determination.”

Since no Israeli leader has ever seriously proposed giving a Palestinian state the same rights and sovereignty Israel claims for itself, these declarations are barely disguised calls for a continuation of Zionism’s historic process of dispossessing Palestinians and calling it “peace.”

A few days ago, senior Israeli minister Tzachi Hanegbi even threatened Palestinians with a “third Nakba” – a reference to Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in 1948 and 1967.

One wonders if Netanyahu’s latest proposal is what he meant.

 

  • Pellam

    I don’t understand why Israeli-Arabs who feel at best neglected in Israel would not welcome this plan. They get to live with people who won’t treat them as second class citizens and are not physically displaced from their land. I don’t buy the ethnic cleansing argument, as the people get to stay put in their own homes. If they want to remain in Israel, they should have the opportunity to move to a different location within Israel and retain citizenship. In my opinion, israel should then insist that they perform all the duties, including joining the army, expected of Jewish citizens,

  • ignasi

    Shameful, but normal, that USA defends a criminal government

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Wow!

    Don’t you realize that the only solution is the transfer of all the European ZioNazi invaders back to Europe?

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Birds of a feather flock together. The U.S. ceased being an independent country, when the Rothschild got their racist pawn elected president in 1912.

  • ignasi

    Servants of the corporation that wants to privatize the World

  • DHFabian

    “Give us this day our daily anti-Israel article…” Or take some time to learn about the very long, complex history of this bit of land. To understand Israel, it’s necessary to understand some basics. Israel is a tiny country, roughly the size of New Jersey, one of our smallest states. Jews are indigenous to this land. It’s both the historic and the modern Jewish nation, the sole Jewish nation, and it’s surrounded by vast, oil-rich Arab nations.

    Many Arabs live in Israel, and they are free to stay or leave. “Palestinians” refers to a group that has been recruited to work toward the destruction of Israel, with the goal of establishing a “100% pure” Moslem Mideast. Think about how the US reacted to Arabs/Moslems in the aftermath of 9/11. Israel doesn’t go to the US extremes, though they do remain determined to survive.

    Note that Israel had already ceded to chunks of the country in prior peace agreements, only to see that agreements be promptly violated. Many of us do NOT agree that a “fair partitioning” of the Mideast means: 100% for the Arabs, 0% for the Jews.

  • DHFabian

    Dumb. The US itself is a criminal government.

  • DHFabian

    Ah, there’s our daily anti-Jew talk! Important, since this is the only race against whom liberals can freely express their bigotry.

  • DHFabian

    Every Arab in Israel is free to stay, live and work in peace, or to leave. They are a sizable portion of Israel’s population. All live within easy traveling distance of an Arab border. If they choose to live and work in peace in Israel, they can. There is a big difference between Israeli Arabs and those we refer to as “Palestinians.”

    Surely Americans can still remember this country’s over-the-top reaction against Arabs and Moslems in this country following 9/11 — the accusations, round-ups, interrogations of ordinary Arab Americans? The public agreed that under the circumstances, this was acceptable. Israel exists in a state similar to what we experienced following 9/11.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Fabian, you’re already exposed yourself as a troll for the ZioNazi Thugdom throttling Palestine so much, that you’ve become a joke. You are also a vicious anti-Semite spuriously equating all Jews with the Rothschild Syndicate and their evil thugdom squatting on Palestine.

  • DHFabian

    What a supremely stupid, bigoted comment! Jews don’t come from Europe. Jews are indigenous to the Mideast (and no question, Americans have a flimsy concept of “indigenous rights”). First, rid this piece of North America of its invaders from Europe, and we’ll take the discussion from there.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Ruled by the same evil syndicate that owns the ZioNazi Thugdom inflaming all the Middle East.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Oh, stop it with you insolent ZioNazi Con Game! You European ZioNazis savagely invaded the Palestinians with the vastly evil intent of violently stealing their country and driving them out by massacres and terror.

    Even if your fake claims of ZioNazi ancestry in Palestine were true, the King-Crane annihilated them over a century ago.

    Were the early Zionists planning on living side by side with Arabs?

    In 1919, the American King-Crane Commission spent six weeks in Syria and Palestine, interviewing delegations and reading petitions. Their report stated, “The commissioners began their study of Zionism with minds predisposed in its favor…The fact came out repeatedly in the Commission’s conferences with Jewish representatives that the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase…

    “If [the] principle [of self-determination] is to rule, and so the wishes of Palestine’s population are to be decisive as to what is to be done with Palestine, then it is to be remembered that the non-Jewish population of Palestine — nearly nine-tenths of the whole — are emphatically against the entire Zionist program.. To subject a people so minded to unlimited Jewish immigration, and to steady financial and social pressure to surrender the land, would be a gross violation of the principle just quoted…No British officers, consulted by the Commissioners, believed that the Zionist program could be carried out except by force of arms.The officers generally thought that a force of not less than fifty thousand soldiers would be required even to initiate the program. That of itself is evidence of a strong sense of the injustice of the Zionist program…The initial claim, often submitted by Zionist representatives, that they have a ‘right’ to Palestine based on occupation of two thousand years ago, can barely be seriously considered.” Quoted in “The Israel-Arab Reader” ed. Laquer and Rubin.

    ->http://ifamericaknew.ORG/history/origin.html

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    “What a supremely stupid, bigoted comment!”

    Nope, not anywhere as bigoted as the savage assault on Palestine by the evil ZioNazi thugs. By the sordid history of the insatiably thieving ZioNazis, that comment is absolutely true.

    “Jews are indigenous to the Mideast”

    Nope, not the Ashkenazi ZioNazi thugs. The Palestinians they assaulted are 100% indigenous to the Middle East.

    How indefensible the ZioNazi presence in Palestine is shown that you must go to crimes other times, other places, by other people to find excuse for the vile evil inflicted by the ZioNazi thugs on the people of Palestine.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Baloney! They are an afflicted 2nd class citizens, even in danger of being assaulted, murdered, and having their land and homes stolen by the evil ZioNazi thugs out of Europe.

    9/11? Bah! The ZioNazi thugs were in on it, and they were the ones that invaded Palestine with vast floods of atrocities and terror.

  • Robert H. Stiver

    Right on, Tecumseh! Right onnnnn!!

  • Robert H. Stiver

    For the crazed (criminally psychotic) Netanyahu and his tribe, “peace” means “war”; white is black, up is down, the Zionist narrative is uber alles. Jesus would thunder “HYPOCRITE!” in a heartbeat to this latter-day Pharisee.

    Palestine Is Still THE Issue!

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Thanks!

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Then they would call him a terrorist and take his organs for transplants.

  • Helen4Yemen

    Good comment except that Natanyahu – whose Lithuanian name is actually “Mikeikowsky” is of European ancestry at a stunning level of 99.9% EUROPEAN. It does not get any purer than 99.9%, does it?

    Harry Katz DNA
    99.9% European
    0% Middle Eastern
    https://ancestry*com/dna/ethnicity/E59C79DB-8EFC-4051-9878-5E78B6DFE86D/share/e3f7a96f-3e0f-4aa2-8b42-6a50874ce6f8/9cc5e907-5c6c-4572-95f2-1992625918dc

    (replace * with dot)

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Hi, nice to see you here!

  • Helen4Yemen

    The “race” you are referring to is snow-white European, is it not, since 95% of world Jewry is of European ancestry?

    Neil Gaiman DNA
    99.9% European
    0% Middle Eastern
    https://twitter*com/neilhimself/status/278035051210498048

    replace * with dot

  • Helen4Yemen

    Thank you my friend. This blog does not allow links … what a bummer?

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    I think it’s an extra that the site has to pay for.

  • Helen4Yemen

    The predatory state is bigger than Kuwait, 3 times the size of Bahrain and Singapore, twice the size of Lebanon, Qatar, Jamaica. And this is Arab land totally grabbed by white folks from Lithuania, Hungary, Germany …stolen land,

    Total area in sq. km. (sq. miles)

    Bahrain … 780 (301)
    Singapore … 719.1 (277.6)
    Cyprus … 9,250 (3,571)
    Lebanon … 10,452 (4,036)
    Jamaica … 10,991 (4,244)
    Qatar … 11,586 (4,473)
    Kuwait … 17,818 (6,880)
    Israel … 20,770 (8,019)

  • Helen4Yemen

    “Jews are indigenous to this land”

    Which “Jew”? The snow-white European or the charcoal black Africa or the Chinese or Arab Jews are indigenous?

    DNA has confirmed that the Ashkenazi have no trace of Middle East ancestry, zero, zilch! Does DNA lie?

    Name………………………. European DNA……. Middle Eastern DNA

    1) Alex Feinberg…………… 99.8% …………… 0%

    2) Dershowitz DNA………. 99.9% …………….0%

    3) Rabbi Hammerman…,,, 99.9% …………… 0%

    4) Tony Kushner…………… 99.9% …………….0%

    5) Joseph Cohen………….. 99.8% …………… 0%

    6) Bill Maher…………………..99.9% ……………..0%

    7) Neil Gaiman……………… 99.9% …………… .0%

    8) Jill Sobule………….. …….99.9% ……………..0%

    9) Alisa R Doctoroff…….. ..98.0% …………….. 0%

    10) A.J. Jacobs………………99.9% ……………. 0%

    Source:

    https://disqus*com/home/channel/semite/discussion/channel-semite/stunning_ashkenazi_dna/
    replace * with .

  • chetdude

    Gee, I don’t understand why European-Americans would complain if they were deprived of their citizenship and forcefully moved (ethnically cleansed) to the new nation of MissiAlabaGeorgCaroFloridi-stan…

  • chetdude

    You know less about how Illegal Occupation and Apartheid works in the real world than you do about Health Care, DH…

  • chetdude

    Partly correct.

    The tribes that called themselves “Jews” originated in Africa (like everyone else) and migrated to the Middle East. Many stayed in the region eventually called Palestine and substantially constitute some of the “lower classes” in the Apartheid state of Israel…

    The Zionists who stole the land from its inhabitants — both Jewish and Palestinian Arab were primarily European — with all of the rapacious, elitist baggage that being European includes… (ask a Native American)

  • Robert H. Stiver

    PR Moderator: Why was this reply directed to me “deleted”? I want to read it; please display it.

  • Helen4Yemen

    I never delete comments unless I made the mistake of replying one intended for another. I have no idea what was deleted.

  • Helen4Yemen

    The Algerians rejected the foreign element on their land, the French.
    Please tell me the reason the Jews of Poland, Hungary, Lithuania are
    still leeching off Arab land. They have no problem going home, do they?

  • Helen4Yemen

    The European Ashkenazi has not even a trace of Middle East ancestry and he is there as a leech, to leech off other people’s land.

    DNA has confirmed that the Ashkenazi have no trace of Middle East ancestry, zero, zilch!

    Name………………………. European DNA……. Middle Eastern DNA

    1) Alex Feinberg…………… 99.8% …………… 0%

    2) Dershowitz DNA………. 99.9% …………….0%

    3) Rabbi Hammerman…,,, 99.9% …………… 0%

    4) Tony Kushner…………… 99.9% …………….0%

    5) Joseph Cohen………….. 99.8% …………… 0%

    6) Bill Maher…………………..99.9% ……………..0%

    7) Neil Gaiman……………… 99.9% …………… .0%

    8) Jill Sobule………….. …….99.9% ……………..0%

    9) Alisa R Doctoroff…….. ..98.0% …………….. 0%

    10) A.J. Jacobs………………99.9% ……………. 0%

    Source:

    https://disqus*com/home/channel/semite/discussion/channel-semite/stunning_ashkenazi_dna/
    replace * with .

  • Helen4Yemen

    Here is what Harry Katz had to say discussing his DNA results
    _____________________________________________
    “But I see no genetic evidence for our (Askenazic) roots in the
    Middle East, and I disagree with you that there are major
    similarities between the DNA of the Ashkenazim and Sepharadim
    unless intermarried. The origin of the Ashkenazim is not resolved
    at all. All I know is that it is a very isolated, restricted gene pool
    with little evidence of DNA infusions from other Europeans, as a
    whole. The Ashkenazim are not a hybrid group, but the purest
    white European group outside of Scandinavia, perhaps.”
    _____________________________________________
    I do not see how the Ashkenazim and Sephardim are related; we
    do not share the same inherited genetic disorders, and although
    the commonality is supposed to be the common Levant” or
    “Middle eastern” source none of this turns up in my ancestry and
    I am representative of 93% of Ashkenazim.”
    _____________________________________________
    To me there is simply no way that this population could have
    arisen out of the Jewish exiles following the fall of Jerusalem. The
    Ashkenazim , are, indeed, a very peculiar people, whose roots- in
    my opinion- are Russian, but whose religion is Middle eastern.

    I would submit that the apostles- and Jesus- have more DNA in
    common with today’s Palestinians than today’s Ashkenazim!
    _____________________________________________
    Help me out here, Mr. Entine. I just received my DNA results; I am
    99% European, and 93% Jewish European. My Dna results clearly
    indicate I have absolutely no Middle Eastern DNA. I am, as
    expected 2% Italian- non-Jewish, (I had thought, perhaps, more),
    but where on earth is the Middle Eastern DNA of the Ashkenazi
    of whom I am VERY representative?
    _____________________________________________
    Hold it… I don’t understand. I am an Ashkenazi Jew, and my DNA
    results which just came back indicate that I have NO Middle
    Eastern DNA, and this is supposed to be representative of
    Ashkenazi in general. Where, then, does the Middle eastern DNA
    show up in a profile that is 99 European, of which 93% is Jewish
    European, with no Middle eastern DNA?
    _____________________________________________
    https://www*ancestry*com/dna/ethnicity/E59C79DB-8EFC-4051-9878-5E78B6DFE86D/share/e3f7a96f-3e0f-4aa2-8b42-6a50874ce6f8/9cc5e907-5c6c-4572-95f2-1992625918dc

    replace * with dot

  • Helen4Yemen

    I am Middle Eastern with Middle East DNA and when I look at the Ashkenazi, I am looking at aliens from Europe. I can see him coming from a mile away and very distinctly European. It is a major shame for the Ashkenazi to deny their European roots.

    Alan Dershowitz
    99.9% European
    0% Middle Eastern
    http://www*pbs*org/weta/finding-your-roots/files/2014/11/AlanDershowitzDNA*jpg
    Repalce * with .

  • kevinzeese

    Popular Resistance did not delete it. Helen posted something that said deleted. We have no idea why or what this is about.

  • kevinzeese

    Nothing was deleted. You posted something that said deleted, as far as we can tell. Even if we had not published it or had deleted it, the post would not say deleted.

  • Pellam

    Sorry, but the Franchnin Algeria were always French. the Jews in Israel are not citizens of the countries you name. I have not heard of those countries asking for the defendants of those they tried to kill to return. Moreover, Half of the Jewish population or so for the cans from arable land. When are the Arabs going to pay them for all the property they stole. Moreover there were more Jews kicked out of Arab countries than there were Arabs kicked out of what is now Israel.

  • Pellam

    Perhaps those European Americans would like to give their land back to the Native Americans.

  • They do allow links, its just that they trigger automatic moderation.

  • kevinzeese

    Why are you publishing things that say “deleted”? We have not deleted any of your posts. Even if we had it would not say “deleted” on the discussion. Why are you doing this?

  • Pellam

    Well thank you for being honest. More people should be as honest on this is as you. Those leftist who claim that it’s all about the occupation on the West Bank are the most hideous liars. Once again, thank you for your honesty.

  • kevinzeese

    We allow links. We just have to approve comments with links. We have not denied any comment in this discussion.

  • kevinzeese

    It is automatic because spammers who are trying to sell products usually have links. So, it just means we review them. It is very rare for us not to approve a comment with links.

  • kevinzeese

    No extra charge for links, just an extra step for us to approve the comment so it may take a little longer.

  • kevinzeese

    Why are you posting comments that say “deleted?” We did not delete any of your comments.

  • Great idea which makes perfect sense, a small price to be free from those horrid spammers.

    More sites ought to contemplate this strategy.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Let’s see how honest you are! Didn’t the ZioNazi thugs invading from Europe have the intention of seizing the country and driving the indigenes out by atrocities and terror, culminating in the savage Plan Dalet?

    Over 750,000 people (~80%) driven off their ancestral lands

    Over 500 Arab villages and towns BULLDOZED and buried under pine forests

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Thanks! I was hoping you would clear that up for me.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Unlike a lot of other places, you do monitor your comments.

  • Pellam

    Actually, it was the Arabs who drove out more Jews than Vica Versa. Most of the land the Jews control they either paid top dollar for or it was mandate land. The Arabs now want to take back land they sold already. Typical slimey behavior from rapists and murderers.

    That is my honest assessment.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Hilarious! You don’t even know who invaded whom.

    Also, you don’t know that the ZioNazi thugs only managed to buy crookedly 6.6% of the land, inspite of tactics like these.

    Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won
    Middle East – Tom Suarez on January 1, 2017

    By the time the Balfour Declaration was finalised, thirty-plus years of Zionist settlement had made clear that the Zionists intended to ethnically cleanse the land for a settler state based on racial superiority; and it was the behind-the-scenes demands of the principal Zionist leaders, notably Chaim Weizmann and Baron Rothschild.

    First-hand accounts of Zionist settlement in Palestine had already painted a picture of violent racial displacement. I will cite one of the lesser known reports, by Dr. Paul Nathan, a prominent Jewish leader in Berlin, who went to Palestine on behalf of the German Jewish National Relief Association. He was so horrified by what he found that he published a pamphlet in January, 1914, in which he described the Zionist settlers as carrying on

    a campaign of terror modelled almost on Russian pogrom models.

    ->http://mondoweiss.NET/2017/01/terrorism-israeli-state/

  • Helen4Yemen

    1) If it shows “deleted” on the comments section, it means I posted a comment to the wrong party which may happen about only once a year … very rare.

    2) When I post a comment with a link and it goes into pending, then I choose not to wait to see if it will be approved or not, I just put ‘*’ in place where the dots appear on the link and tell people to replace the * with dot.

    I hope that I have explained it.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Why not have the responsible parties pay, the ZioNazi thugs and their owners, the Rothschild syndicate?

    Actually, the gradual departure of the Arab Jews from their homes in Arab lands was another machination of Ben-Gurion by which he planned to fool and terrorize the Arab Jews into Palestine to serve the victorious European Zionist invaders of Palestine as laborers and farmers. It was Ben-Gurion who ordered the Zionist assaults on the Arab Jews.

    Zionist crimes against the Jews
    ->http://www.thepeoplesvoice.ORG/TPV3/Voices.php/2013/11/11/zionist-crimes-against-the-jews

    Zionist terror against the Jews
    ->http://www.inminds.CO.UK/jews-of-iraq.html

    False flag of the Lavon affair
    ->http://whatreallyhappened.COM/WRHARTICLES/lavon.html
    ->http://judicial-inc-archive.blogspot.COM/2011/01/1954-lavon-affair-one-of-israels-more.html

    All planned and ordered by David Ben-Gurion
    ->https://en.wikipedia.ORG/wiki/One_Million_Plan

    Thanks for reminding us that the assault of the alien European Zionist Ashkenazi invaders was not just against the people of Palestine but against all the Arab Jews. Thanks for reminding us of the vast evil of the European Zionists in forcing two Million Arab (Jews, Christians, and Muslims) people from their homes.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    So that is your excuse for the European ZioNazi thugs never giving back the land that unjustly dispossessed stand ready to receive? Is that your excuse for continuing the vile theft of land, resources, and life from the indigenous people by the odious ZioNazi thugs?

    Do you believe the ZioNazi thugs have a license to continue their flood of crimes against humanity?

  • Helen4Yemen

    DO THE MATH!

    1) Ashkenazi Jewry = 90% to 95% of world Jewry.

    2) World Jewry 2016 = 14,410,700

    3) Total Jews in Palestine = 6,336,400

    4) Total world Ashkenazi Jews = 90% x 14,410,700 = 12,969,630

    5) Total world non-Ashkenazi Jews = 1,441,070

    6) Assuming all non-Ashkenazi are in in Palestine
    1,441,070/ 6,336,400 = 22.7%

    That is counting all the African, Asian, Arab Jews inside
    and outside of Palestine. Therefore, the Arab Jews are
    much fewer than 10%.

  • Helen4Yemen

    1948 = 851,000 total Jews in Arab countries
    1958 = 469,060 remained (55%). Can you tell
    me why the Arab Jews remained in their Arab
    countries decade after decade after the Zionist
    state was established if they were expelled.

  • Helen4Yemen

    I am Middle Eastern and I do not give a damn what happened between two white European brothers, one Jew and the other Christian. The white Jew is European and his European ass belongs on his Ashkenazi grandma’s land of Poland, Hungary, Ukraine.

    Harry Katz DNA
    99.9% European
    0% Middle Eastern

    https://ancestry*com/dna/ethnicity/E59C79DB-8EFC-4051-9878-5E78B6DFE86D/share/e3f7a96f-3e0f-4aa2-8b42-6a50874ce6f8/9cc5e907-5c6c-4572-95f2-1992625918dc

    replace * with dot

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    MOSSAD hadn’t gotten around to attacking them yet, or afflicting them with false flags.

  • Helen4Yemen

    It is amazing that he thinks we the people of the Middle East are

    responsible for what happened to him in Europe.
    ________
    “The indigenous Arab population rejected the idea,

    accepted as natural in the West, that they had a moral

    obligation to sacrifice their land to compensate for the

    crimes committed by Europeans against Jews. They

    perhaps wondered why a more appropriate response

    would not have been to remove the population of

    Bavaria and turn it into a Jewish state – or given the

    self-righteous moralizing they hear from the United

    States, why the project could not have been carried

    out in Massachusetts or New York.” Chomsky

  • Helen4Yemen

    How many native “Indians” are chasing the Americans with a knife? Or knocking them down with a truck? Look at me, I am Middle Eastern and I detest every fiber of your goddamned squatting European ass in my region, Mr. Lithuanian, Hungarian, Russian .. ie. European aliens squatting on Arab land.

  • Pellam

    Go away. You bore me.

  • Helen4Yemen

    Palestine is not your grandmother’s land, is it?

    Neil Gaiman DNA
    99.9% European
    0% Middle Eastern

    https://twitter*com/neilhimself/status/278035051210498048

    Replace * with dot

  • Robert H. Stiver

    Tecumseh, we are being set upon by Zionist trolls intent on sucking the oxygen from more worthy pro-justice, pro-Palestine endeavors. I so admire you and Helen4Yemen and other principled, moral, intelligent observers….

  • Helen4Yemen

    And how is your snow-white Lithuanian grandmother connected to the
    “Mandate land”? I thought Iraq too was under British Mandate? But after the Mandate, Britain did not toss Iraq to other White Europeans. Palestine was handed over by one white man, the British to another white man, the Ashkenazi.

  • Helen4Yemen

    There were no Jews in Palestine for over a thousand
    years until indigent Jews began to arrive from Eastern
    Europe in the 1830′s and 1840′s who were living on
    Halukka (charities) sent to them from abroad. These
    poor Eastern European Jews were sent to plant the
    seed for Jewish presence on that land since there
    were none up to that time. When Zionists arrived in
    Palestine in 1882, they found 15,000 Jews, who were
    all Yiddish-speaking migrants from Eastern Europe but
    there were no indigenous Arabic-speaking Palestinian
    Jews. There were only indigenous Palestinian Muslims
    and Palestinian Christians but no Palestinian Jews.
    Today, there are no more Palestinian Jews in the
    world. Over centuries, they simply converted to Islam
    or Christianity.

    Jewish land ownership in Palestine
    of total area of 26,323,000 dunums

    1882 — 22500 — 0.1%
    1900 — 218000 — 0.8%
    1914 — 418000 — 1.6%
    1927 — 865000 — 3.2%
    1936 — 1231000 — 4.7%
    1945 — 1588365 — 6.0%
    1947 — 1734000 — 6.6%

  • Helen4Yemen

    Benny Morris interview – Haaretz – 2004
    ♦ “The revised book is a double-edged sword. It is based on many documents that were not available to me when I wrote the original book, most of them from the Israel Defense Forces Archives. What the new material shows is that there were far more Israeli acts of massacre than I had previously thought. To my surprise, there were also many cases of rape. In the months of April-May 1948, units of the Haganah [the pre-state defense force that was the precursor of the IDF] were given operational orders that stated explicitly that they were to uproot the villagers, expel them and destroy the villages themselves.
    ♦ In Acre four soldiers raped a girl and murdered her and her father. In Jaffa, soldiers of the Kiryati Brigade raped one girl and tried to rape several more. At Hunin, which is in the Galilee, two girls were raped and then murdered. There were one or two cases of rape at Tantura, south of Haifa. There was one case of rape at Qula, in the center of the country. At the village of Abu Shusha, near Kibbutz Gezer [in the Ramle area] there were four female prisoners, one of whom was raped a number of times. And there were other cases. Usually more than one soldier was involved. usually there were one or two Palestinian girls. In a large proportion of the cases the event ended with murder. Because neither the victims nor the rapists liked to report these events, we have to assume that the dozen cases of rape that were reported, which I found, are not the whole story. They are just the tip of the iceberg.”
    ♦ In some cases four or five people were executed, in others the numbers were 70, 80, 100. There was also a great deal of arbitrary killing. Two old men are spotted walking in a field – they are shot. A woman is found in an abandoned village – she is shot. There are cases such as the village of Dawayima [in the Hebron region], in which a column entered the village with all guns blazing and killed anything that moved.
    ♦ “The worst cases were Saliha (70-80 killed), Deir Yassin (100-110), Lod (250), Dawayima (hundreds) and perhaps Abu Shusha (70). There is no unequivocal proof of a large-scale massacre at Tantura, but war crimes were perpetrated there. At Jaffa there was a massacre about which nothing had been known until now. The same at Arab al Muwassi, in the north. About half of the acts of massacre were part of Operation Hiram [in the north, in October 1948]: at Safsaf, Saliha, Jish, Eilaboun, Arab al Muwasi, Deir al Asad, Majdal Krum, Sasa. In Operation Hiram there was a unusually high concentration of executions of people against a wall or next to a well in an orderly fashion.
    ♦ “That can’t be chance. It’s a pattern. Apparently, various officers who took part in the operation understood that the expulsion order they received permitted them to do these deeds in order to encourage the population to take to the roads. The fact is that no one was punished for these acts of murder. Ben-Gurion silenced the matter. He covered up for the officers who did the massacres.”
    ♦ One of the revelations in the book is that on October 31, 1948, the commander of the Northern Front, Moshe Carmel, issued an order in writing to his units to expedite the removal of the Arab population. Carmel took this action immediately after a visit by Ben-Gurion to the Northern Command in Nazareth. There is no doubt in my mind that this order originated with Ben-Gurion. Just as the expulsion order for the city of Lod, which was signed by Yitzhak Rabin, was issued immediately after Ben-Gurion visited the headquarters of Operation Dani [July 1948].”
    ♦ “From April 1948, Ben-Gurion is projecting a message of transfer. There is no explicit order of his in writing, there is no orderly comprehensive policy, but there is an atmosphere of [population] transfer. The transfer idea is in the air. The entire leadership understands that this is the idea. The officer corps understands what is required of them. Under Ben-Gurion, a consensus of transfer is created.”
    ♦ “Of course Ben-Gurion was a transferist. He understood that there could be no Jewish state with a large and hostile Arab minority in its midst. There would be no such state. It would not be able to exist.”
    ♦ “Ben-Gurion was right. If he had not done what he did, a state would not have come into being. That has to be clear. It is impossible to evade it. Without the uprooting of the Palestinians, a Jewish state would not have arisen here.”
    ♦ That is what Zionism faced. A Jewish state would not have come into being without the uprooting of 700,000 Palestinians. Therefore it was necessary to uproot them. There was no choice but to expel that population. It was necessary to cleanse the hinterland and cleanse the border areas and cleanse the main roads.

  • kevinzeese

    Great, as long as people realize we are not censoring you or deleting your comments. Everything you posted has been published, nothing has been “not approved” or “deleted.”

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    We’re all doing the best we can against these proponents of horror.

  • kevinzeese

    This perspective is classic Antisemitism. There is a big difference between criticizing the Israeli government for its militarism, apartheid and mistreatment of Palestinians (to put it mildly) and criticizing Jewish people . The latter is counterproductive and inaccurate; it is a form of unacceptable bigotry. People of Jewish faith do not control us through banking or the media, yes there are some prominent Jews in those areas but to claim Zionist bankers rule the world is bigoted Antisemitism.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    No, it’s criticizing a particular set of Jewish people, not all Jews, just a small minority. Don’t you ever examine who our bankers are? The controllers of our finance? The controllers of our media? It’s not just a few prominent Jews among them, but a great mass of very wealthy and powerful ones. They are the reason for our absurd support of the savage Zionist adventure in the Middle East and our massive military apparatus seeking to strangle the world.

    They are also delighted when people like you identify them as being or representing all Jews and defend them as such.

    Jews are just like everyone else. Because those outside the highest circles of power aren’t told what’s going on and are at liberty to keep their eyes tightly shut, I forgive you your blatant mischaracterization of both Ken O’Keefe’s presentation and my own viewpoint. The fine work and high intentions of you and Dr. Margaret Flowers makes that very easy to do.

    Note: “bigoted Antisemitism” is redundant as well as incorrectly applied. Upon reflection I’ve sure that you can think of a few countries clearly not ruled by Zionist bankers.

  • Helen4Yemen

    90 to 95% of world Jewry supported the Gaza bombings of 2009 and 2014

    https://disqus*com/home/discussion/channel-semite/90_95_of_jews_worldwide_supported_the_gaza_bombings/

    Replace * with .

  • Helen4Yemen

    Who runs Hollywood? C’mon

    December 19, 2008|JOEL STEIN

    I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

    How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by:

    ⦁ News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish),
    ⦁ Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish),
    ⦁ Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish),
    ⦁ Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew),
    ⦁ Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish),
    ⦁ CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel),
    ⦁ MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish)
    ⦁ NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish).

    If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

    The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

    The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

    As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day.

    So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that’s what we do best. I’m weighing several slogans, including: “Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!”; “Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible”; and “Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all.”

    I called ADL Chairman Abe Foxman, who was in Santiago, Chile, where, he told me to my dismay, he was not hunting Nazis. He dismissed my whole proposition, saying that the number of people who think Jews run Hollywood is still too high. The ADL poll, he pointed out, showed that 59% of Americans think Hollywood execs “do not share the religious and moral values of most Americans,” and 43% think the entertainment industry is waging an organized campaign to “weaken the influence of religious values in this country.”

    That’s a sinister canard, Foxman said. “It means they think Jews meet at Canter’s Deli on Friday mornings to decide what’s best for the Jews.” Foxman’s argument made me rethink: I have to eat at Canter’s more often.

    That’s a very dangerous phrase, ‘Jews control Hollywood.’ What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood, he said. Instead of “control,” Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry “happen to be Jewish,” as in “all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.”

    But Foxman said he is proud of the accomplishments of American Jews. “I think Jews are disproportionately represented in the creative industry. They’re disproportionate as lawyers and probably medicine here as well,” he said. He argues that this does not mean that Jews make pro-Jewish movies any more than they do pro-Jewish surgery. Though other countries, I’ve noticed, aren’t so big on circumcision.

    I appreciate Foxman’s concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

    jstein@latimescolumnists*com

    http://articles*latimes*com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

    (replace * with .)

  • Helen4Yemen

    Hollywood Reporter’s Most Powerful People in Entertainment – 6/22/2016
    How many of them are Jews? And what % are the Jews in America? only 2%
    1/100 Bob Iger Chairman and CEO, Walt Disney Co.
    2/100 James Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch and Rupert Murdoch CEO; Executive chairman; Executive chairman, 21st Century Fox
    3/100 Leslie Moonves President and CEO, CBS Corp.
    4/100 Steve Burke CEO, NBCUniversal and senior executive vp, Comcast Corp.
    5/100 Ted Sarandos Chief content officer, Netflix
    6/100 Shari Redstone and Sumner Redstone President, national amusements, and vice chair, Viacom and CBS Boards; Chairman emeritus, Viacom and CBS Corp.
    7/100 Jeff Bewkes Chairman and CEO, Time Warner
    8/100 Peter Rice Chairman and CEO, Fox? Networks Group
    9/100 Alan Horn Chairman, Walt? Disney Studios
    10/100 Leonardo DiCaprio Actor/producer
    11/100 Jeff Shell, Donna Langley and Ron Meyer Chairman, Universal Filmed Entertainment; Chairman, Universal Pictures; Vice chairman, NBCU
    12/100 Dana Walden and Gary Newman Co-CEOs and chairmen, Fox TV Group
    13/100 Ari Emanuel and Patrick Whitesell Co-CEOs, WME
    14/100 Bonnie Hammer Chairman, NBCUniversal Cable Entertainment
    15/100 Stacey Snider, Emma Watts and Jim Gianopulos Co-chairman; President of production; Chairman and CEO, 20th Century Fox
    16/100 Steven Spielberg Director/producer
    17/100 John Lasseter Chief creative officer, Walt Disney and Pixar Animation Studios
    18/100 Kevin Feige President, Marvel Studios
    19/100 Richard Lovett, Kevin Huvane and Bryan Lourd Managing partners, CAA
    20/100 Kathleen Kennedy President, Lucasfilm
    21/100 J.J. Abrams Director/producer
    22/100 Oprah Winfrey CEO, OWN
    23/100 Jennifer Lawrence Actress
    24/100 Richard Plepler and Casey Bloys CEO; President of programming, HBO
    25/100 Michael Lynton CEO, Sony ?Entertainment
    26/100 Kevin Tsujihara Chairman/CEO, Warner Bros.
    27/100 Jon Feltheimer CEO, Lionsgate Entertainment
    28/100 Jeffrey Katzenberg CEO, Dreamworks Animation
    29/100 Ben Sherwood Co-chairman, Disney Media Networks and president, Disney/ABC TV Group
    30/100 John Landgraf CEO, FX ?Networks
    31/100 David Nevins CEO, Showtime Networks
    32/100 Tom Rothman Chairman, Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group
    33/100 Robert Greenblatt and Jennifer Salke Chairman; President, NBC Entertainment
    34/100 Ryan Murphy Writer/executive producer
    35/100 Sue Kroll, Toby Emmerich and Greg Silverman President, worldwide marketing and distribution, Warner Bros
    36/100 Jeremy Zimmer, David Kramer and Jay Sures CEO; Managing directors, United Talent Agency
    37/100 Shonda Rhimes Executive producer
    38/100 Jack Gao Group vice president/CEO, international investments and operations, Wanda Cultural Industrial Group
    39/100 Brad Pitt Actor/producer
    40/100 Brad Grey and Rob Moore Chairman/CEO; Vice chairman, Paramount Pictures
    41/100 John Skipper President, ESPN and co-chairman, Disney Media Networks
    42/100 Nancy Dubuc President/CEO, A+E Networks
    43/100 Chris Meledandri CEO, Illumination Entertainment
    44/100 Josh Sapan and Charlie Collier President/CEO, AMC Networks; President/GM, AMC
    45/100 Ellen DeGeneres Talk show host/producer
    46/100 Dick Wolf Executive producer
    47/100 Lorne Michaels Executive producer, ‘Saturday Night Live’
    48/100 Mark Burnett President, MGM TV and Digital Group
    49/100 Arnon Milchan Chairman, New Regency
    50/100 Ben Affleck Actor/director/producer
    51/100 David Zaslav President/CEO, Discovery Communications
    52 100 Judd Apatow Director/producer
    53/100 Chuck Lorre Executive producer 52/100 Judd Apatow Director/producer
    54/100 Dwayne Johnson Actor/producer
    55/100 Glenn Geller President, CBS Entertainment
    56/100 Channing Dungey President, ABC Entertainment
    57/100 Roy Price Head, Amazon Studios
    58/100 Gary Barber Chairman and CEO, MGM
    59/100 Robert Simonds and Adam Fogelson Chairman and CEO, STX Entertainment; Chairman, STX Motion Picture Group
    CEO, Annapurna Pictures
    61/100 Simon Kinberg Writer/producer 60/100 Megan Ellison
    62/100 Brett Ratner and James Packer Partners, RatPac Entertainment
    63/100 Kevin Reilly President, TNT/TBS and chief creative officer, Turner Entertainment
    64/100 Melissa McCarthy Actor/producer
    65/100 Mark Pedowitz President, The CW
    66/100 Greg Berlanti Executive producer
    67/100 Chris Albrecht CEO, Starz
    68/100 James Cameron Director/producer
    69/100 Mike Hopkins CEO, Hulu
    70/100 Phil Lord and Chris Miller Writer/director/producers
    71/100 Tyler Perry Actor/producer and CEO, Tyler Perry Studios
    72/100 Christopher Nolan Director/producer
    73/100 Peter Roth President, Warner Bros. TV
    74/100 Denzel Washington Actor/director
    75/100 Frank Marshall Producer
    76/100 Ridley Scott Director/producer
    77/100 Peter Chernin Chairman/CEO, Chernin Group
    78/100 Jeff Skoll and David Linde Founder/chairman; CEO, Participant Media
    79/100 Steve Golin Founder, Anonymous Content
    80/100 Chris Silbermann Founding partner, ICM Partners
    81/100 Jimmy Fallon Host, ‘The Tonight Show’
    82/100 Kevin Hart Actor/comedian
    83/100 Martin Scorsese Director/producer
    84/100 Matt Damon Actor
    85/100 Zack Van Amburg and Jamie Erlicht Presidents, U.S. programming and production, Sony Pictures TV
    86/100 Skip Brittenham Partner, Ziffren Brittenham
    87/100 Thomas Tull and Mary Parent Chairman/CEO; Vice chairman, production, Legendary
    88/100 Amy Schumer Actor/comedian
    89/100 Doug Herzog President, Viacom Music & Entertainment Group
    90/100 David Ellison Founder/CEO, Skydance
    91/100 Aaron Sorkin Writer/producer
    92/100 Kevin Beggs Chairman, Lionsgate TV Group
    93/100 Scott Rudin Producer
    94/100 Alejandro G. Inarritu Director/producer
    95/100 Brian Grazer Partner, Imagine Entertainment
    96/100 Neal Moritz Producer
    97/100 Robert Downey Jr. Actor/director/producer
    98/100 Jason Blum Founder/CEO, Blumhouse Productions
    99/100 Chris Pratt Actor
    100/100 Lin-Manuel Miranda Actor/creator, ‘Hamilton’

    http://hollywoodreporter*com/lists/thr-100-hollywood-reporters-powerful-904591/item/chris-pratt-thr-100-904659

    (replace * with .)

  • Helen4Yemen

    What I have in common with Ken O’Keefe is that we both try to alert the world to the ODED YINON document. I read this document at least once a year.
    _______________________________________
    THE ODED YINON PLAN ON HOW TO BREAK UP THE ARAB COUNTRIES
    _______________________________________
    Please do a find on “Shi’ite or Sunni” on this post. The essence of the document is how to break up the Arab armies and countries so that the Jews now in Palestine will never have to face having to go back home like the French, the British, the Italians or the Crusaders. The document was written in 1982

    1- The Arab world is too fractured to pose a threat to the Jews in Palestine
    The Arab Moslem world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly self-destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes.
    _______________________________________
    2- The Arab world is made up of ethnic groups hostile to one another
    The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorities and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging.
    _______________________________________
    3- Algeria, Morocco,Tunisia are made up of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers
    Apart from Egypt, all the Maghreb states are made up of a mixture of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers. In Algeria there is already a civil war raging in the Kabile mountains between the two nations in the country. Morocco and Algeria are at war with each other over Spanish Sahara, in addition to the internal struggle in each of them. Militant Islam endangers the integrity of Tunisia and Qaddafi organizes wars which are destructive from the Arab point of view, from a country which is sparsely populated and which cannot become a powerful nation. That is why he has been attempting unifications in the past with states that are more genuine, like Egypt and Syria.
    _______________________________________
    4- Sudan is made up of four groups hostile to one another
    Sudan, the most torn apart state in the Arab Moslem world today is built upon four groups hostile to each other, an Arab Moslem Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non-Arab Africans, Pagans, and Christians.
    _______________________________________
    5- Egypt: Christian minority may want a state of their own
    In Egypt there is a Sunni Moslem majority facing a large minority of Christians which is dominant in upper Egypt: some 7 million of them, so that even Sadat, in his speech on May 8, expressed the fear that they will want a state of their own, something like a “second” Christian Lebanon in Egypt.
    _______________________________________
    6- Syria: Shia minority ruling over majority Sunni
    Syria is fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime which rules it. But the real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni majority and the Shi’ite Alawi ruling minority (a mere 12% of the population) testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble.
    _______________________________________
    7- Iraq: Sunni minority ruling over Shia majority – Kurdish minority will make it easy to break it up
    Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi’ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren’t for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq’s future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shi’ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.
    _______________________________________
    8- Bahrain, UAE, Oman: Sunni minority rules over Shia majority, Kuwait: 75% foreign, Saudi Arabia: 50% foreign
    All the Gulf principalities and Saudi Arabia are built upon a delicate house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait, the Kuwaitis constitute only a quarter of the population. In Bahrain, the Shi’ites are the majority but are deprived of power. In the UAE, Shi’ites are once again the majority but the Sunnis are in power. The same is true of Oman and North Yemen. Even in the Marxist South Yemen there is a sizable Shi’ite minority. In Saudi Arabia half the population is foreign, Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi minority holds power.
    _______________________________________
    9- Jordan: Palestinian majority ruled by Bedouin minority
    Jordan is in reality Palestinian, ruled by a Trans-Jordanian Bedouin minority, but most of the army and certainly the bureaucracy is now Palestinian. As a matter of fact Amman is as Palestinian as Nablus.
    _______________________________________
    10- Syrian army is Sunni, commander Shia; Iraqi army is Shia ruled by Sunni
    All of these countries have powerful armies, relatively speaking. But there is a problem there too. The Syrian army today is mostly Sunni with an Alawi officer corps, the Iraqi army Shi’ite with Sunni commanders. This has great significance in the long run, and that is why it will not be possible to retain the loyalty of the army for a long time except where it comes to the only common denominator: The hostility towards Israel, and today even that is insufficient.
    _______________________________________
    11- Iran is composed of Sunni, Shia Alawis, Sunni Kurds, it faces Ethnic and religious tension,
    Half of Iran’s population is comprised of a Persian speaking group and the other half of an ethnically Turkish group. Turkey’s population comprises a Turkish Sunni Moslem majority, some 50%, and two large minorities, 12 million Shi’ite Alawis and 6 million Sunni Kurds.
    _______________________________________
    12- Afghanistan: 33% Shia, 67% Sunni
    In Afghanistan there are 5 million Shi’ites who constitute one third of the population.
    _______________________________________
    13- Pakistan: 15 million Shia (1982 figures)
    In Sunni Pakistan there are 15 million Shi’ites who endanger the existence of that state.
    _______________________________________
    14- The Muslim world made up of ethnic minorities is like a house of cards
    This national ethnic minority picture extending from Morocco to India and from Somalia to Turkey points to the absence of stability and a rapid degeneration in the entire region. When this picture is added to the economic one, we see how the entire region is built like a house of cards, unable to withstand its severe problems.
    _______________________________________
    15- Jews should have given Jordan to Palestinians and removed them from Palestine
    We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing. Today, we suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming decade, otherwise we shall not survive as a state.
    _______________________________________
    16- Jews should never have lost the Sinai peninsula
    The loss of the Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically identical to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one quarter of our present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil. The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not, in the near future, serve to alter that state of affairs. (Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967.
    _______________________________________
    17- Hoping for Egypt to give Israel the excuse to start a war and take back Sinai.
    Israel has two major routes through which to realize this purpose, one direct and the other indirect. The direct option is the less realistic one because of the nature of the regime and government in Israel as well as the wisdom of Sadat who obtained our withdrawal from Sinai, which was, next to the war of 1973, his major achievement since he took power. Israel will not unilaterally break the treaty, neither today, nor in 1982, unless it is very hard pressed economically and politically and Egypt provides Israel with the excuse to take the Sinai back into our hands for the fourth time in our short history. What is left therefore, is the indirect option. The economic situation in Egypt, the nature of the regime and its pan-Arab policy, will bring about a situation after April 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly in order to regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy reserve for the long run. Egypt does not constitute a military strategic problem due to its internal conflicts and it could be driven back to the post 1967 war situation in no more than one day.
    _______________________________________
    18- How to break up Egypt
    Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the Nineteen Eighties on its Western front. Egypt is divided and torn apart into many foci of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic State in Upper Egypt alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key to a historical development which was only set back by the peace agreement but which seems inevitable in the long run.
    _______________________________________
    19- Break up Lebanon into five provinces
    Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precendent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track.
    _______________________________________
    20- How to break up Syria and Iraq into ethnic and religious components
    The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.
    _______________________________________
    21- How to break up Iraq along ethnic/religious lines
    Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.
    _______________________________________
    22- How to break up Saudi Arabia
    The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear and natural development in light of the present political structure.
    _______________________________________
    23- Transfer power in Jordan from the King to Palestinians
    Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run after its dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run. There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel’s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority.
    _______________________________________
    24- Change the regime in Jordan and expel Palestinians from Palestine to Jordan
    Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future.
    _______________________________________
    25- Jews must remove all Palestinians and send them to Jordan
    The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa’amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river.
    _______________________________________
    26- Palestinians must understand that Jews must rule over all Palestine-and they need to move to Jordan
    Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.
    _______________________________________
    27- Palestinians consider all of Palestine stolen irrespective of 1948 or 1967 and Jews consider all of Palestine theirs – even beyond Jordan River
    Within Israel the distinction between the areas of ’67 and the territories beyond them, those of ’48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of ’67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter.
    _______________________________________
    28- The West Bank must be populated with Jews or else Jews will be defeated like crusaders.
    Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today.
    _______________________________________
    29- No force can remove the Jews from Palestine
    Our existence in this country itself is certain, and there is no force that could remove us from here either forcefully or by treachery (Sadat’s method). Despite the difficulties of the mistaken “peace” policy and the problem of the Israeli Arabs and those of the territories, we can effectively deal with these problems in the foreseeable future.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    I’ve already read it, but never all at one sitting. Too nauseating.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Doesn’t that show how effective the Hollywood and corporate news media are?

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Nah, that’s one of the silliest hasbara inversions I’ve ever seen.

  • Helen4Yemen

    1976 Mike Wallace interviewed the Shah of Iran

    Mike Wallace: You are not telling me the Jewish lobby in the United States pulls the strings of the presidency?

    Shah: … it is too much even for Israel’s own interests.

    Mike Wallace: You think the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful for the interests of Israel.

    Shah: I think so, sometimes they are dis-serving the interests of Israel because …they are pushing too many people.

    Mike Wallace: Why would the president of the United States pay attention to that lobby?

    Shah: They are strong.

    Mike Wallace: Strong in what sense?

    Shah: They are controlling many things.

    Mike Wallace: Controlling what?

    Shah: Newspapers, medias, banks, finances, and I am going to stop there.

    Mike Wallace: Now wait just a second, you really do believe that the Jewish community in the United States are that powerful, they make the media reflect their view of foreign policy?

    Shah: Yes.

    Mike Wallace: They do not report – we do no report honestly?

    Shah: Don’t mix things, please. I do not say “the media”, I say “in the media” they have people – not the entire media, some newspapers will always reflect their views, yes.

    Mike Wallace: The New York times, for instance, is owned by the (?…burger) family, who are Jewish. Are you suggesting that the New York Times is biased in its treatment of the question of Zionism, Israel’s existence, the United States’ relationship with the Arab world?

    Shah: I will have to put all the articles of the New York Times has written on this subject and reach a conclusion, you can put this to the computer and it will answer you.

    Mike Wallace: What you are saying is that yes, you do believe?

    Shah: Well, let’s wait for the answer of the computer.

    Mike Wallace: Washington Post?

    Shah: The same.

    Mike Wallace: The Networks?

    Shah: Yes.

    Mike Wallace: I must say you are speaking with your characteristic candor.

    Shah: Yes, if you like, I try to be candid, I have always been.

    (replace * with .)

  • Pellam

    Hasbara-what Arab propagandist argue when out of ideas, which is almost inevitable to happen.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Hehe! The Shah is saying this to Mike Wallace, who believes he’s not white, because he’s Jewish.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Nope, it happens every time a trained ZioNazi disinformation agent like you yammers nonsense, which is inevitable considering the huge ZioNazi brain fogging budget for covering the innumerable crimes against humanity done in the ZioNazi assault on Palestine.

  • Helen4Yemen

    I just read a 2013 article by Jeff Goldberg titled:

    “DEAR JEWISH MEDIA, STOP MAKING LISTS OF JEWS!”

    where he referred to European Ashkenazi Jewry as “Semites”. You do not know how much that offends me. I am a Semite and no one on earth will mistake me for a European, and here is a European, Goldberg, saying that he is a Semite. The problem is that either of us have to be a Semite and not both since we are of two very different races.

    This is what he wrote:

    “John J. Mearsheimer, … in which he listed those Semites he considers to be “righteous Jews,” ”

    “I love playing the “Who is a Jew?” game as much as the next Semite.”

    Advice to Goldberg: For only $99 you can find out if you are a Semite or not. Do your DNA test and guaranteed that it will come up as 99.9% European, not even a tiny trace of Middle East ancestry.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    He wouldn’t do it. He’s scared, just like most of those who are in denial, about Jewish media and financial controllers, and the syndicate in which they are contained. What will they do, if they study the matter and find out it’s all true? The Internet has enabled such personal research to a marvelous degree.

    Note that the syndicate isn’t all Jewish, since the actual requirements don’t involve Jewishness at all, but rather wealth and psychopathy. Jewishness is merely a very handy tool for them, and they use it to the hilt.

  • Pellam

    Come on, you are just saying what your Islamist handlers tell you to say. Do they give you a script, because I have had this nonsensical Hasbara argument before?

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Do you really think that Muslims have learned to operate in the ZioNazi manner? Please tell me. I have no idea.

  • Pellam

    It is hard to believe Islamists could do anything other that shiiit and screw. But they do have Russian handlers.

  • TecumsehUnfaced

    Time to block the ZioNazi dildo out of my DISCUS mailbox.

  • FeshonALfliP

    you’re not a semite. The whole world knows this… you even know it. So you can cut the crap.

  • FeshonALfliP

    The truth will be revealed that these serpents stole the real Hebrew identity.

  • Helen4Yemen

    S H O O ! BLOCKED!

  • kevinzeese

    Just so people know – Helen4Yemen was not blocked (if that is what her message implies).

  • Helen4Yemen

    No, you did not block me and let me also state here that I do not block anyone else for having different viewpoints. But when it degenerates into name calling, then I block them and also let them know I was blocking them in the hope that they won’t respond back to my comments in the future. Most websites have decent commentators but in recent times, I was commenting at a website and in a matter of days, I blocked more than 60. It got to the point that more than half of my screen was covered with “this user is blocked”. I left that blog but said thank you to the moderator for allowing me to comment.

  • Helen4Yemen

    I could not see Pellam’s comments and I had to open up this article from a browser where I was not signed in to Disqus. I wanted to see what his comment was that made me block him. Here it is:
    _________
    Pellam TecumsehUnfaced
    It is hard to believe Islamists could do anything
    other that shiiit and screw. But they do have Russian handlers.
    ________
    This kind of comment or the one making such a comment should not be allowed. Where is the point? That Muslims (he calls them “Islamist”) “shiiit and screw”? You have to draw the line between what is acceptable free speech and what is not. Just because he has a keyboard and fingers does not mean he can urinate all over the place. Btw: I would object to such comment no matter who the targets are – Muslim, Hindu, Jews …

  • Pellam

    Promise.