Oil Industry Warns Shell Not To Drill Arctic

| Educate!

Above photo: From Shutterstock.

Note: This article shows the power of the movement to end fossil fuels. Resistance to fossil fuel infrastructure is slowing down projects and making them more expensive or is stopping them altogether. High visibility spectacle actions such as the ShellNo protests in Washington State and Portland, OR bring negative publicity to new projects (something the CEOs pay attention to). And the rejection of a fossil fuel culture by decreasing our use of them and building alternative sources of energy and transportation in our communities will bring the fossil fuel era to an end. In the last phase of the struggle, it is necessary to push harder. Let us all do what we can to end the fossil fuel era and transition to a new energy economy that is cleaner, healthier and more sustainable.   -Margaret Flowers

Shell has received the final permits to drill off the coast of Alaska,courtesy of the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). Many in the oil industry are timid, citing the many high risks involved from both a business and environmental perspective. One expert even predicts that oil demand is set for a long-term decline. If that’s true, drilling in the Arctic would be an epic miscalculation — and a poor business decision.

Former BP executive John Browne has publicly warned Shell of the potentially disastrous consequences of their decision, saying, “I think you’ve got to be careful what you do, and cost includes your long-term reputation.” In reply, Shell CEO Ben van Beurden says he has been on a “personal journey” in deciding whether or not to drill, although precisely what this personal journey consisted of has not been disclosed.

Shell and the BSEE are adamant that they will be mindful of the risks. It’s possible that they are more fearful of bad PR than hurting the environment, and that they are taking this risk because of the possibility of a big payday. If cartoons and stereotypes have taught us anything, it’s that oil people love money. But what if the prospector only thinks he has struck black gold, when in fact it’s a resource rapidly decreasing in value?

Amory Lovins, an oil industry expert for over 40 years, suspects that we are currently at our height in terms of how much oil we use and that there is nowhere to go but down. There are many factors at play, from young people’s disinterest in owning a car to increased fuel efficiency. The previous dynamic of more demand than supply could very well reverse in the near future.

With BP apprehensive and experts predicting a lower demand for oil, it becomes worrisome that Shell should decide to drill, baby, drill. The long-term environmental and financial consequences will either be pleasantly surprising or an unmitigated disaster. Either way, this is a historical and landmark decision that will have ramifications for generations to come.

  • If BP were so concerned, it wouldn’t be drilling in the Gulf again, despite being allowed to by Obama. Yes, it is **Obama** that controls the executive branch of government, the one that includes the BSEE.