Open Letter To Democracy Now! Criticizing Their Nicaragua Coverage

| Educate!

Above: Nicaraguans celebrate 1979 revolution, July 2018.-By Alfred Zniga for Associated Press.

Letter to Democracy Now about their coverage of the Nicaragua crisis

We are a group of journalists, writers and activists with knowledge of the current crisis in Nicaragua who want to express our concern about Democracy Now’s coverage of it. We believe that the four recent programs you have run on Nicaragua have not given the balanced assessment we would expect of what is a complex situation, where local media are highly polarised and there is prolific dissemination of ‘fake news’.

We acknowledge that progressive opinion about Daniel Ortega’s government and what has happened in Nicaragua since April this year is divided. Some, including people who were active in support of the Sandinista revolution in the 1980s, now support Ortega’s opponents. Others, and we include ourselves in this group, may have criticisms of the Ortega government but believe that the achievements of the revolution are currently at great risk. This is because while some of the opposition may have (or may have had) revolutionary sentiments, they are aligning with right-wing governments in the hemisphere and with right-wing Republicans in the US whose clear objective is to kill Sandinismo and restore neo-liberal government in Nicaragua. This is evidenced by the fact that the opposition’s sole message is that ‘Ortega must go’ with no explanation of what alternative they offer.

A further important issue is reporting about the violence that has taken place. Lamentably, Democracy Now has accepted opposition claims of high numbers of deaths and that ‘the vast majority have been killed by pro-government forces’. The source of these claims is local ‘human rights’ organisations who are highly partial in their evidence gathering, and which nevertheless have strongly influenced bodies such as Amnesty International. Independent analysis shows that the number of deaths is being exaggerated, that they are attributable to violence on both sides and that since April similar numbers of opposition and of government supporters have been killed.

Of your four programs, the first was exclusively with opposition voices (Alejandro Bendaña, Mónica López Baltodano). The second, with government spokesperson Paul Oquist, was peppered with anti-government images and quotes. The third, where you featured Camilo Mejia, was much more balanced. However, you used material about one of the opposition deaths without balancing that by mentioning, for example, the killing of four police officers a few days earlier or using the material which Camilo sent you beforehand. The latest program, with Noam Chomsky, featured a highly partial introduction even though Chomsky himself mainly spoke about Nicaragua’s history rather than current events. None of your reports have covered the many, heavily attended, pro-government demonstrations, including the massive commemoration of the anniversary of the revolution on July 19.

Our purpose in writing is not to urge you to take a pro-Ortega ‘line’ but to ask for proper balance in your reporting. We acknowledge that your interviews with Paul Oquist and Camilo Mejia responded to concerns expressed earlier by some of those signing this letter. But it is hardly a fair presentation if the background to such interviews is repeated citing of the opposition’s version of events as if it is accepted fact, when it is highly contested. The mainstream media – New York Times, Washington Post, Guardian, BBC etc. – have all followed a similar approach. However, we have higher expectations of Democracy Now. We urge you to meet them in your future coverage of Nicaragua.

Yours sincerely,

Max Blumenthal, journalist

Al Burke, Editor, Nordic News Network

Lee Camp, head writer/host of Redacted Tonight

Marilyn Carlisle, Casa Baltimore/Limay delegation leader and activist

Courtney Childs, Chair, Peace and Solidarity Committee of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism

Sofía Clark, political analyst

Mitchel Cohen, former Chair, WBAI radio Local Board

Dave Cosgrave, Nicaragua Solidarity Campaign Action Group, UK

Carolina Cositore Sitrin, former Prensa Latina journalist

Dr Francisco Dominguez, Middlesex University, UK

Pat Fry, peace and solidarity activist, NYC

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, author, and historian

Paul Baker Hernández, singer, songwriter and author

Chuck Kaufman, Alliance for Global Justice

Dan Kovalik, human rights lawyer

Barbara Larcom, Baltimore Coordinator, Casa Baltimore/Limay

Arnold Matlin M.D, Rochester (NY) Committee on Latin America

Camilo Mejia, former Amnesty International prisoner of conscience

Nils McCune, IALA Mesoamerica

Nan McCurdy, Methodist missionary

Barbara Francis Moore, artist, writer

Ben Norton, journalist

Stephen Sefton, writer

Brian Willson, Lawyer activist

Kevin Zeese, co-director, Popular Resistance

  • Sybil Cochrane

    I’m sad to hear that Democracy Now! Is apparently entering the “Echo Chamber”! I, along with the signees, have higher expectations of the program! It’s more and more difficult these days to find ‘Truth in the Machine’ while neoliberalism is aligning with the right in its seemingly global sweep. Thank you Popular Resistance! I’m loving this daily newsletter.

  • lcotler

    Very important this Open Letter, but I fear it will be overlooked by too many weak-kneed progressives who have lost sight of the big picture, which is precisely what this letter asks us to hold on to.

    Was Castro perfect and without flaw and mistakes? No. Chavez? No. Maduro? Far from it. Ortega? Perhaps even less. But they are not as important as the drive to revolt in Latin America. Their revolutions are what the neoliberal toadies of the international corporate state are trying to crush.

    We must not let them!

    !

  • subcomandante Felix

    Sadly, when it comes to their coverage of Latin America, especially Nicaragua and Venezuela, Democracy Now is becoming more and more like the U.S. corporate regime change media. When DN parrots over and over the exact same sound bites, i.e. the
    violence is perpetrated by “police and government-backed militias” it is clear where they are getting their dis-information from – U.S. funded “human rights” front groups. Less obvious is DN’s use of the tried and true mainstream media tactic of presenting both sides of the story. Without rigorously fact checking the bogus claims of these so-called civil society groups, Democracy Now legitimizes their fake news narratives – just like the main-stream media.

  • Doña Susy

    Sadly, DN! is also corruptible. I look to the signers of this open letter as standard-bearers of truth…May that always be so.

  • Tony Ryan

    Thanks for this! Where do I sign?

  • Steven Berge

    One of the Koch brothers is on the PBS board, and I don’t think he’s doing it for charitable reasons.

  • Steven Berge

    What do you expect when one of the Koch brothers sits on the board of directors of PBS. With his record of subversive activities in pursuit of oligarchy, I find it unconscionable that PBS allowed him on the board. It confirms my observation that they were in pursuit of greater revenue streams.

  • Sybil Cochrane

    Haha Steven! Do the Koch brothers EVER do anything for charity? Pretty funny there!

  • Steven Berge

    Reminds me of our “humanitarian” aid to other countries. It’s often meant for regime change or to make a government amenable to our corporate plunder of their resources.

  • Prontojim

    Wondering what this has to do with DM. NPR is different. Correct?

  • Prontojim

    We have talked to our friends in the campo and they say that much is being exaggerated. And that they are not too worried about the situation. They say that this is typical of the mainly 2 groups pro and contra the Sandinistas. Those that support the changes brought by the Revolution and those who wish to go back to the old ways. That each group has its own style and manner of going about protesting and fighting with those that they oppose. So we have it from our friends that school is continuing, people are being paid, crops are growing, and that people can get around but they don’t like to go to Managua. These two groups have been fighting for 40 years. For what this is worth.

  • Steven Berge

    I was referencing PBS, which is the dominant carrier of Democracy Now, yes? I was alluding to the loss of journalistic integrity when a man who’s been involved in propaganda and misinformation campaigns, sits on the board of a “public broadcasting service”.

  • Prontojim

    PBS. My error. Democracy Now is not, nor has it ever been perfect. But it is one of the more Progressive media sources. In the case of the reporting from Nicaragua, DM has been criticized from all sides about the balance of their reporting. So that is from Right, Left, Center.