Prejudential Is A Must-Read To Understand Current Presidential Election Debacle

| Educate!

Above Photo: From

Every four years, ruling elites aligned on either side of the two-party duopoly choose their most important political official, the president, to defend and protect their interests. Ordinary Americans are taught that the electoral process is a shining example of democracy at work. No other elected politician in the United States is more mythologized than the American president. George Washington couldn’t tell a lie. Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Historians, educators, and the mass corporate media have for centuries portrayed presidents as heroes of the people and the most powerful representatives of the “land of the free” and “home of the brave.”

Margaret Kimberly’s book Prejudential: Black America and the Presidents comes at the most critical of moments for the two-party duopoly in the United States. The DNC is clearing a path for Joe Biden to be its 2020 presidential nominee to take on Donald Trump. Biden’s elevation has come at the expense of Bernie Sanders. Sanders’ reformist politics and policies are popular with a large portion of the Democratic Party electorate, especially young people. A Joe Biden versus Donald Trump showdown in the general election would pit a racist servant of billionaires against a racist billionaire incumbent.

Prejudential provides readers with the historical context necessary to understand why the Democratic Party elite despises Sanders yet embraces Joe Biden. In the 1970s, then Senator Biden opposed busing and desegregation. In the 1980s and 1990s, he wrote key legislation that erected the mass Black incarceration state. Yet Biden is considered a friend of Black America because of his coziness with the Black political establishment. A critical takeaway from Prejudential is that neither Biden’s anti-Black racism nor the fact that Black America remains politically loyal to the Democratic Party should surprise us. Presidential elections tend to erase Black Americans from the political scene unless they are being cynically discussed as a chip to elect a Democrat to the White House. The fear of Donald Trump or another representative of the White Man’s Republican Party ensures this political dynamic remains unchanged.

Kimberly reviews the sordid relationship that U.S. presidents, regardless of political party, have always possessed with Black America. From George Washington to Donald Trump, U.S. presidents have held Black people in contempt and exploited them ruthlessly for economic and political gain. Ten of the first twelve presidents were slaveholders. George Washington extracted teeth from his slaves to serve as his own personal dentures. Abraham Lincoln had every intention of colonizing Black Americans on the African continent to appease white racists before he was assassinated in 1865. Woodrow Wilson played the Ku Klux Klan-laden film Birth of a Nation at the White House and his Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Franklin Roosevelt, would later become president himself and be caught by future Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall calling Black Americans “niggers.” In the modern era, Bill Clinton was called the “first Black president” by famed author Toni Morrison even though he took photo-ops at the popular Klan rally destination of Stone Mountain, Georgia.

By exposing the racist hatred that all U.S. presidents have harbored for Black people, Kimberly unlocks insight into Black political behavior. Any improvement in the condition of Black America has come as a result of Black political protest and organizing, not the goodwill of whichever president has occupied the Oval Office. Black Americans rebelled against slavery and joined the Union army in droves to pressure Lincoln into his reluctant support for emancipation. Lyndon Johnson only signed onto Civil Rights legislation after Black freedom activists such as Fannie Lou Hammer placed their lives on the line for genuine change. In the absence of a liberation movement, Black America has been left with the choice of supporting one of two available evils. And fear of the White Man’s Party didn’t begin with Donald Trump. The Democrats held the status of White Man’s Party for over a century prior to the election of Franklin Roosevelt. Beginning in the 1970s, Republicans became fully-fledged members of the White Man’s Party when white racists waged a backlash against the Black liberation movement in the name of “law and order.” 

Prejudential strikes a rare balance between concise commentary and attention to detail. The book uncovers the historic pattern of U.S. presidents acting as instruments of white supremacy. However, unlike much of the so-called “resistance” to Trump, Kimberly doesn’t condemn white supremacy to lend support for any president candidate or political party. Rather, she demonstrates that anti-Black racism is fundamental to the Oval Office and U.S. society at large. The myth of American exceptionalism and its opportunist purveyors have committed a shameful crime. That crime is the intentional misrepresentation and omission of history to curry favor with the powerful. This has contributed greatly to the massive suffering Black Americans have experienced at the hands of the racist, capitalist, and imperialist U.S. government since its formation over two centuries ago.

Reading Prejudential is an important step toward starting the conversations that need to be had in order to truly address the racist roots of the U.S. presidency and the system it presides over. We cannot begin these conversations if we believe that one president was better for Black America than another. If we continue to search for a lesser-evil president, then we will continue to face new and more effective evils than those that came before. As Kimberly notes, it is not hard to expose the hatred and ire that all U.S. presidents have harbored toward Black America. Moreover, rejecting U.S. presidents as the racist war criminals they are helps move us closer to the far more difficult task of figuring out just who we should be celebrating and why. Kimberly argues that people like Nat Turner, John Brown, Fannie Lou Hammer and the like deserve our praise rather than Abraham Lincoln, Lyndon Johnson, or Barack Obama. Prejudential provokes readers to question the nobility of the presidents and begin imagining the kind of system of governance that would better serve the interests of Black America and all exploited peoples.

Prejudential will have readers wondering whether any decent human being could run for the commander-in-chief seat knowing the history documented throughout the book. Kimberly fills an important gap in the independent media punditry and analysis of the current presidential election cycle. Black Americans have historically been stripped of their humanity by the powerful forces in control of the United States and U.S. presidents have always been in the vanguard of this historical process. We can look to Prejudential for answers as to why Joe Biden and Donald Trump are far preferable to the establishment than Bernie Sanders. Rather than condemning Trump alone, Prejudential issues a take down of all forty-five anti-Black presidents to move Black politics and the entire left in a more militant and principled direction. For this, we should all be grateful and act accordingly by picking up a copy.

  • R.N. Cable

    This review (and the book itself) is a severe indictment of our racist U.S. government. Unfortunately, there is no COURT above that government which could try, convict and penalize it for all the harm its racism has done.

  • NOTgaltHouse

    So why did black people support biden, when they had a much better option in Bernie Sanders?

  • kevinzeese

    Barack Obama. Being Obama’s VP trumped his terrible record on mass incarceration, the drug war, and an unfair economy.

  • mwildfire

    according to Glen Ford of Black Agenda Report, it’s mostly because they’re terrified of more Trump, and believe that white people won’t vote for a leftish candidate. It’s not that they like Biden–they see him as more electable.
    But we also have to note, that thing even the alternative press averts its eyes from–the evidence in raw exit polls that the vote is actually being fraudulently taken from Sanders and perhaps Warren and given to Biden. Given the evidence that Biden is slipping into dementia, the choice of VP is critical.I don’t mean critical for us to influence–we HAVE no influence. I mean when the announcement is made, we’ll know who’s steering policy.

  • chetdude

    I would add that the vast majority of those “Black votes” were from older folks surrounded by white racists in red-red states that WILL NOT VOTE FOR ANY DEMOCRAT.

    Hardly the most rational group to depend upon to decide who can beat Trump.

    Polling (and basic political common sense and history) tells us that Bernie will beat Trump by a much greater margin than Biden would have…

  • chetdude

    And obscured the fact that corporate friendly Biden was cynically put on the ticket to get the white, working class reagan democrat vote and ease the fears of Wall Street and corporate America…