Putin Lectures Obama

| Educate!

Russia Ended the Cold War, How does the US End the War on Terror?

Note: President Putin’s op-editorial column in The New York Times has many Americans upset. There is a lot of anti-Russian perspective in the nation, a hold-over from the Cold War Era and politicians playing the Russia card to stoke fear and anger.  While many are focusing on the shortcomings of the messenger and his country, it would be much healthier for Americans to use this moment, not just of his column but of a democratic process stopping a war and pushing the country toward diplomacy, as an opportunity to re-think the militaristic foreign policy of the U.S., which has a tradition of more than 100 years but has been on steroids since the attack of 9-11.  In the piece below Chuck Spinney makes an important point — “Putin’s subliminal message may well be: Look, we ended the Cold War; now, at long last, is it not time for America to undergo a national introspection of its own and end its state of perpetual war, before it further destabilizes even larger swathes of the world?”

How do we the people of the United States stop perpetual war? Stopping one war is not enough (and it may just be a temporary stop), we need to move U.S. policy in a very different direction.

Who Benefits From America’s State of Perpetual War?

That our Noble Peace Prize winning President and the Congress needed a rational lecture on the need for a little common sense in foreign policy, from a graduate of the KGB, says a lot about about the degraded nature of domestic politics in the United States.

Domestic politics do not end at the water’s edge, as the foreign policy elite would like us to believe. On the contrary, any nation’s foreign policy is always a reflection of its domestic politics. (see for example, Robert Dallek’s insightful history, The American Style of Foreign Policy: Cultural Politics and Foreign Affairs.) The political soap opera surrounding Obama’s quest to bomb Syria is a case in point. Two thirds of the American people opposed the war, yet elites have been debating how to ignore the will of the people. These domestic politics are the real subject of Putin’s lecture. Implicitly, his lecture is also about the democratic duty of American citizens to reign in the elites claiming falsely to be acting in their name.

Should a former KGB agent be giving advice to the people of a constitutional democracy?

Think about the pathway that ‘democracy’ has travelled on over the last twelve years: On September 11, 2001, the entire world was on the side of the United States. In fact one of the largest, if not the largest, of the world wide demonstrations in support of the United States was a mass vigil in Tehran, Iran — a country we promptly denounced as being part of an axis of evil. Twelve years later, America is increasingly isolated, its leadership elites having used 9-11 as a pretext to fabricate rationales for invading Afghanistan and Iraq and for bombing Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia. Now Syria is in the crosshairs for reasons that are questionable, to put it charitably, and once again, the elites are fabricating stories to get their way.

America is in a state of perpetual war with large parts of the Muslim world. America is viewed by more and more people around the world, including some of its non-Muslim allies, as a self-righteous, narcissistic super power that believes its exceptional status gives it the right to bomb and bully anyone it deems to be a ‘threat’ to its interests or moral values.

Putin’s subliminal message may well be: Look, we ended the Cold War; now, at long last, is it not time for America to undergo a national introspection of its own and end its state of perpetual war, before it further destabilizes even larger swathes of the world?

Perhaps we, as the owners of our government, should be asking ourselves questions like –

How did our country land itself in a state of perpetual war?

Is our President, a man who exited the world, including Syria,* with promises to change in America’s behaviour, the cause of the problem evoking Putin’s lecture? Or is Mr. Obama merely a front man presiding over a deeper, more profound set of domestic political distortions? Is he a protector of an increasingly dysfunctional, distinctly un-American status quo domestic political apparat that benefits the richest one percent at the expense of the masses?

How and why did the American people allow their elites and political representatives — Republicans and Democrats alike — to exploit 9-11 in an arbitrary way to place our nation on a grotesque moral pathway into a shameful state of mismatches between the (1) values we profess to uphold and others expect us to uphold, (2) those values we actually hold dear as demonstrated by our actions, and (3) the conditions in the world we have to contend with?

But most importantly, with respect to domestic politics of America’s state of perpetual war, Cui Bono?

*I was in Levantine, Syria in the summer of 2008, and the excitement on the street over Obama’s possible election and the promise it held for the Middle East was palpable and infectious.

Franklin “Chuck” Spinney is a former military analyst for the Pentagon and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press. He be reached at chuck_spinney@mac.com

  • Don Belanger

    Its about time the US started to mind its own business rather than exporting our so-called democracy to other countries–you know–the kind where only leading industrials and financiers get the benefits of democracy, plus our new surveillance state. Putin has it right—If you want a nation be a major force on the “moral high road” than act like it.

  • Pingback: Popular Resistance Newsletter – In The Midst Of A Transformational Moment | WAMMToday()

  • Israel war manufacturer’s have gas mask kits they want their corporate controlled right-wing government to put an order in to outfit the entire country…, just like they did in the fake profit Iraq “war.”


    Because Israel’s defense budget is so large, it has created a whole community of the Israeli elite, of generals and officers and people in the arms industry, which is–this is their livelihood, this is their source of income. And a cut to the Israeli defense budget is something they’re concerned about, ergo need war.