The Embarrassing Report On Russian Influence Over US Election

| Educate!

Above: The Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin: Did the Russians hack U.S. election databases? (Yahoo News photo illustration, photos: Maxim Shemetov/Reuters, Sergei Karpukhin/Reuters, AP, AP)

Note: As an example of the absurdity of the Director of National Intelligence report on Russia’s impact on US elections, from page 6 of the report on Russia influencing the 2016 US elections: “In an effort to highlight the alleged ‘lack of ‘democracy’ in the United States, RT broadcast, hosted, and advertised third party candidate debates and ran reporting supportive of the political agenda of these candidates. The RT hosts asserted that the US two-party system does not represent the views of at least one-third of the population and is a ‘sham’.” Those General Election debates of third party candidates were held in 2012. Now we know that one-third of the board members of the phony commission on presidential debates have resigned and the commission’s activities are being challenged as illegal. It seems like RT told more truth about presidential debates then the US commercial media. The report also cites the show “Breaking the Set” with host Abby Martin — even though it was no longer on RT for the 2016 election. One-third of the report, six pages of 18, were spent on discussing RT America. See “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Intelligence Council (2017).

The intelligence agencies report is weak broth yet the bi-partisans in Washington, DC and much of the corporate media (with exceptions as described in the article below) are singing a chorus of “Russia did it” with a solo by former presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, refraining “it’s an act of war.” Perhaps the most accurate tweet on the report was along the lines of ‘The report on Russia is fake news seeking to undermine people’s confidence in US intelligence.’ Frankly, it is hard to understand why US intelligence agencies would put their names and logos on such a weak report. KZ

Intelligence Report On Russian Election Influence Is A Flop

Last week the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the NSA and the FBI released a report about alleged Russian hacking of the Democratic National Council and on Russian influence operation on the U.S. presidential election. The report failed to convince anyone. It is indeed a public relation disaster for the Intelligence Community.

John Harwood covers “the economy and national politics for CNBC and the New York Times.” More then 100,000 people follow him on Twitter. He is known as Hillary Clinton supporter and chummy with John Podesta who ran Clinton’s election campaign.

Harwood set up a simple poll. It is not statistically representative but gives a picture of a general sentiment.

This result surely shows the limits of power of the so-called Intelligence Community. But it is worse: yesterday’s “Russian hacking” claims failed to convince even its most ardent and anti-Russian supporters.

Daily Beast: U.S. Spy Report Blames Putin for Hacks, But Doesn’t Back It Up

Kevin Rothrock (Moscow Times):

I cannot believe my eyes. Is this really part of the US government’s intelligence case?I’ll say it: the declassified USG report “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” is an embarrassment.

Susan Hennessey (Lawfare, Brookings):

The unclassified report is underwhelming at best. There is essentially no new information for those who have been paying attention.

Bill Neely (NBCNews):

Lots of key judgements but not many key facts & no open proof in US Intell. report into alleged Russian hacking.

Stephen Hayes (Weekly Standard):

The intel report on Russia is little more than a collection of assertions. Understand protecting sources/methods, but it’s weak.

Julia Ioffe (The Atlantic):

It’s hard to tell if the thinness of the #hacking report is because the proof is qualified, or because the proof doesn’t exist.@JeffreyGoldberg Have to say, though, I’m hearing from a lot of Russia watchers who are very skeptical of the report. None like Putin/Trump.

When you lost even Julia Ioffe on your anti-Russian issue …

Clapper as DNI and Brennan as CIA chief should have been fired years ago. They will both be gone by January 20. The Intelligence Community will remember them as the chief-authors of this devastating failure.

  • kbro2

    reminds me of colin powell’s hand drawings of iraqi missile trucks when he testi-lied in front of the u.s. congress

  • mwildfire

    Don’t forget the bottom line. It doesn’t MATTER if most reasonably intelligent and well-informed people are underwhelmed by the report–outlets like the NYX had headlines that the report was released, that’s ALL the average American will read, and they’re satisfied that a Russian connection has been proven. Justifying the warmongering on the Russian border right now by NATO forces and the setting up of an official propaganda office were, I presume, the point. Tbey don’t need to be credible.

  • DHFabian

    What this urgent situation teaches us, above all, is that US media has achieved a new low point where both MSM and the media marketed to liberals have abandoned their responsibility to “ensure an informed public.” The reports are so slanted that US news media overall looks like a woods in the aftermath of a tornado. Reports come fast, furious, and brimming with contradictions.

    What appears to be true is that a pile of emails from Clinton’s/the DNC’s email server were accessed and passed along to Wikileaks, which seems to have then released them (some? all?) to the public. This mess was quickly twisted into: “Russia hacked the election!” Since then, media have tried to moderate this to: “Russia influenced the election!” Nonsense.

    Whatever happened, it had no impact on the election results. It has been no secret that much of the Dem voting base have deeply opposed the Clinton wing since the 1990s. Nevertheless, Trump is such an appalling candidate that Clinton did win the majority of the popular vote. Clinton wouldn’t have done any better without the leak/hack (depending on one’s spin). From there, the Electoral College chose Trump, and that’s just the way the system works.

    Again, the election was not hacked. Voting machines were not hacked, and vote counts were not altered. Wikileaks stated from the start that it wasn’t Russia that had accessed those emails.

  • DHFabian

    Could someone please remind Congress that the longest, most expensive war in US history has already drained this country economically and militarily? Because so many of our jobs have been shut down/shipped out since the 1980s, we no longer have the means to rebuild. A war with Russia would quickly bring an end to the US.

  • Pingback: Allegations Against Russia Less Credible Every Day | PopularResistance.Org()

  • chetdude

    “NYX had headlines that the report was released, that’s ALL the average
    American will read, and they’re satisfied that a Russian connection has
    been proven.”

    Yep, it’s right up there with the myths of Kuwait/Incubators, Saddam-9/11, that the rising Stock Market has any real meaning and that a paternalistic sky-god micromanages everything…

  • Pat_Shackleford

    Agreed. Furthermore, there is significant/substantial reasons to believe (as do I) that the emails were leaked (to Wikileaks) by an INSIDER from within the DNC.

  • kbro2


  • kevinzeese

    Every article on Popular Resistance has a Facebook icon below the top photo which can be used to post the article on Facebook.

    If you are talking about the image of Colin Powell in the comments click on the comment, go to twitter and you can copy the link and post that on FB.