The EPA Is Aggressively Approving Very Dangerous Pesticides

| Educate!

Above Photo: From

As reported by U.S. Right to Know last May, court documents showed that a domestic policy advisor at the White House said, ‘We have Monsanto’s back on pesticides regulation.’

In a new and unsettling report from the Center for Biological Diversity, we now have confirmation that this promise is being kept.

The study, called Toxic Hangover: How the EPA Is Approving New Products With Dangerous Pesticides It Committed to Phasing Out, found that the EPA approved 1,190 pesticide products and denied only 71 in the 2017-2018 time period, giving it a 94% approval percentage.

And for the products that were denied, they were rejected largely because of procedural issues, such as minimum study or packaging requirements having not been met, rather than toxicity concerns.

The approved pesticide products include:

– 15 new products containing neurotoxic carbamates or organophosphates, including chlorpyrifos (Banned in Europe and a few U.S. states)

– 17 new products containing the endocrine disruptor atrazine (Banned in Europe)

– 6 new products containing paraquat, which is so lethal that one spoonful can kill a full-grown adult (Banned in 32 countries, including those in Europe)

– 4 new products containing the extremely dangerous airborne fumigants methyl bromide or chloropicrin (Slated for a global phase-out)

– 91 new restricted-use pesticides, which are so dangerous that they can only be applied by a professional

– 69 new products containing an ingredient the EPA recognizes as a “known” or “likely” carcinogen.

So, how is the EPA justifying all of these approvals?

By claiming that it is replacing and phasing out older, presumably more dangerous pesticide ingredients. However, the Center for Biological Diversity states that the agency has approved many more products with these older ingredients than products with the newer ingredients that were supposed to replace them.

“The EPA has been approving the worst of the worst, and the culture at the agency is very deferential to the pesticide industry. They don’t want to rock the boat,” said Nathan Donley, PhD, Senior Scientist and lead author of this report.

Even for consumers who eat 100% organic, they are not immune to the super-toxic pesticides being sprayed on non-organic food.

These chemicals contaminate our soil and water, sicken farmworkers, and can drift onto organic farms and make their way into the organic food supply. After all, there is a reason that USDA certified organic brands have been increasingly seeking out 3rd-party, glyphosate-free certifications, such as Glyphosate Residue Free.

Unfortunately, Congressional efforts to curb the EPA’s rampant approval of pesticides have made very little headway, which gives organic stakeholders just another reason to be concerned.

  • voza0db
  • nick quinlan

    All of our regulatory agencies have been captured and completely corrupted by the corporations they are supposed to regulate. And, the CDC, FDA, AMA, etc, are all owned by the PharMafia. We as a nation are in serious danger from out of control corporations.

  • Paul Trafelet

    You are 100% right. I’ve been following organic farming methods for 50 years. Sad how money out weighs human health.
    Silent Spring unfolding before our eyes.

  • Tom P

    Are you aware of the economic impact of pests in crops? Water is a precious commodity in most regions, and weeds can consume water and nutrients intended for crops and significantly reduce yields. Studies show “Organically grown” crops have reduced yields up to 65%. We don’t have the real estate in this country to produce enough food without the assistance of pesticides. You said the EPA approved 69 known “likely carcinogens”…that would classify it as a type 2 carcinogen. Did you know of ALL the chemicals EVER tested, there is only 1 that was found to be non-carcinogenic? Just one. For reference, a type 1 carcinogen is known to cause cancer. Alcohol and caffeine are type 1 carcinogens. And I bet you also didn’t know that there are 4 type 1 carcinogens approved for use in “organic” farming. Organic DOES NOT mean safer. And non-organic DOES NOT mean not safe. If we can replace 1 broad spectrum pesticide with 4 selective ones, that’s not bad. It’s smart because it can reduce usage. Do unbiased research if your not afraid to learn the real facts.