The Tasks Of The People-Powered Movement For 2014

| Strategize!

Build Broad National Consensus for Paradigm Shifting Change

In our last article, “Major Social Transformation Is a Lot Closer than You May Realize,” we defined where today’s social-political movement is within the eight stages of successful movements. We have passed the “Take-Off Stage” (Stage 4), gotten through the “Perception of Failure” (Stage 5) and are in the phase of “Building Majority Support” (Stage 6) which is the last stage before “Victory.” In this article we delve deeper into the tasks of the movement in this stage and apply those tasks to current issues faced today.

In this stage, which can take many years, the primary task of the people-powered social movement is to build national consensus through broad and deep grassroots organizing.  The power holders are currently in a crisis management mode. They continue to defend their policies while shifting positions and taking countermeasures to undermine people power. During this stage public opinion is shifting, majorities oppose the current situation and are beginning to see that new alternative solutions must be put in place. People-powered activists are in a battle with the power holders for the hearts and minds of super-majorities of the people.

We ended our last article with a key point that we need to highlight here: our goal is to build a mass movement, which has the support of super-majorities of Americans and has mobilized up to 3.5% of the population.  Therefore, the target of our protests is not the government or a corporation, the target is the people: to educate and mobilize them. We want to show that there is an effective movement speaking to the people’s concerns and putting forth views that they support. We protest the power holders to expose their actions but do not expect them to be capable of addressing our concerns adequately in this stage.

Build unity around the values of the movement

The foundation of the current phase is massive public education and building support in all segments of the population for the values of the movement. This is done through grassroots organizing involving constant outreach to friends, neighbors and family – the local community.  In these conversations, people gain a greater understanding of how the problems of the present system affect them; how the present system violates their values and principles; and how it is in their own self-interest to do something about it.

This is happening now; one example is the low-wage worker movements. While workers and their allies participate in resistance actions like one-day walkouts or mass protests on key shopping days like the Black Friday’s protests at 1,500 Walmarts, members of the community are joining in solidarity. People are learning that when a corporation provides poverty-level pay to a worker, we all subsidize that policy through food stamps, Medicaid and housing subsidies.  The Walton family and Walmart executives (as well as other poverty paying corporations) make massive profits because of worker-subsidies from all of us.  And, paying workers an inadequate wage for their labor violates our values.

While these corporations continue to refuse to change their policies, even though they could afford to and would benefit from doing so, the power holders are responding as expected at this stage with inadequate solutions. The movement has forced 13 states to increase the minimum wage in 2014 which will affect 2.5 million people. This is not a complete victory because no state is putting in place a real living wage. And, in the one place that voted for the movement’s demand, a $15 per hour wage, it is being challenged in court. The struggle must continue. It is not acceptable for workers to still be poverty workers, though some will have less poverty.

Whenever we push to solve current problems, the movement should also put forward a vision of a paradigm shift.  When it comes to workers, one shift is to make workers into owners and decision makers in worker-owned businesses, like cooperatives so they can share the wealth they help to create.  More existing businesses are being converted to worker-owned businesses and there is a growing worker-cooperative movement.  And it is important to link the problems of underpaid workers to the broader economic problem of the wealth divide and build support for the many solutions to that problem.

Exposing the myth and explaining the reality

An important task of the movement is to expose the difference between ‘official policies’ and ‘actual policies.’ That is, what the power holders say they are doing and what the policies actually do, which are often the complete opposite. Every government policy put forward by either of the two corporate-funded parties is designed to help their funders, not the people.

For example, the public is told that we are going to war for democracy or for ‘humanitarian’ reasons, not for resources for corporations. Another example is the ‘all of the above’ energy policy which is said to address climate change and create energy independence but actually does neither while lining the pockets of Big Oil and Gas. On issue after issue there is a discrepancy between the official policies and the actual policies. One of our key jobs is to separate myth from fact, so people understand what is going on around them. Groups like Wikileaks and whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning, Jeremy Hammond and Edward Snowden are doing critical work in exposing the myths by leaking documents that make it undeniable what the government is really doing.

We are going to be seeing myth in hyper-gear in January around the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).  The TPP is the largest trade agreement since the World Trade Organization in the early 90s.  The government has worked hard, with the cooperation of the mass media, to keep the TPP secret from the public.  But, now most people in the activist community are aware of the TPP thanks to high profile protests and leaks of portions of the TPP that reveal the US is pushing an extreme corporate power grab. And more people are aware that the President is trying to circumvent a democratic process of review in Congress.

In early January some of the most pro-corporate members of Congress will put forward a bill calling for Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority.  Fast Track would permit the President to sign the TPP before it goes to Congress. Members of Congress would then have a limited time to review the thousands of pages in this agreement that has been negotiated over the past four years with the help of 600 corporate advisers; they would not be allowed to make changes to it and would only be allowed an up or down vote.

Fast Track is needed to prevent Congress from doing its job under the Constitution. The Commerce Clause gives the constitutional responsibility of “regulating trade between nations” to Congress.  If Congress does its job that will require the contents of the TPP to be made public, hearings to be held and experts and citizens to weigh in.  If the people know what is in the TPP, it will not become law. The only way for the TPP to pass is for its contents to remain secret.

We expect to hear President Obama and corrupt senators like Max Baucus (D-MT) and members of Congress like David Camp (R-MI) telling us that these rigged trade agreements are necessary for the economy.  We just passed the 20 year anniversary of NAFTA, on which the current trade negotiations are based, and the opposite has happened. We need to explode the myth. These trade agreements are not to create jobs or raise wages or even grow the US economy, they are to make transnational corporations wealthier and increase the profits of the investor class.  They are only good for the wealthiest and are terrible for the rest of us, as a recent report found:

“A new Public Citizen report shows that not only did promises made by proponents [of NAFTA] not materialize, but many results are exactly the opposite. Such outcomes include a staggering $181 billion U.S. trade deficit with NAFTA partners Mexico and Canada, one million net U.S. jobs lost because of NAFTA, a doubling of immigration from Mexico, larger agricultural trade deficits with Mexico and Canada, and more than $360 million paid to corporations after “investor-state” tribunal attacks on, and rollbacks of, domestic public interest policies.”

Stopping the TPP will be job one for the movement in 2014. January will be the key month to engage in this issue because a vote on Fast Track is expected by the end of the month.  The TPP is an issue that unites the movement because it affects not just workers but the environment, regulation of finance, Internet freedom, food safety, healthcare and gives corporations control of virtually every aspect of our lives. There are many ways to organize in local communities to unite people and stop the TPP. We can stop the TPP and when we do, it will be a major victory of the people over the transnational corporations and their government allies.

Our task is to change the political environment, not succumb to it.

One of the key points in this phase of the movement is to avoid compromise. We are often told by those who want reform that the solution we are urging is “not on the table.”  We need to refuse to accept the limits of the current political table.  It is evident to all that politics in the United States is corrupted by money from big business interests and the wealthy.  It is corruption that determines what is “on the table” so we need to respond that we are not limited to the corruption-defined political table. We are seeking real solutions that require a paradigm shift. Our task is to change the political environment, not succumb to it.

An example of some advocates making the mistake of accepting compromises is the health law.  Advocates know that the empirical evidence shows that the only approach that will provide quality healthcare to all and control costs is a single payer, Medicare for all, system.  We saw a variety of approaches to the “not on the table” claim of those in power during the debate on the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Many single payer advocates bought into the ACA, which is really a big insurance scam, because they were Democratic Party-leaning organizations. These groups were given tens of millions of dollars to advocate for the ACA.  This is the classic strategy described in leaked documents from Stratfor, the private intelligence firm that works with big business and government, of how the power holders deal with political movements.  They divide and conquer by defining four groups of activists.  First, they pulled the ‘realists’ and ‘opportunists’ away from the movement by giving them access to politicians and funding for their work.  Then, they further try to isolate the ‘radicals’ (people who want transformative change of the system) by pulling the ‘idealists’ away.  Idealists were given the fake choice of the public option, not only was this not a real solution to the health crisis but it was never really on the table.

The problems with the roll out of the ACA website exposed the deeper problems, that the law is a complicated, insurance-based and for-profit approach that will consistently lead to greater costs and obstacles for patients and will weaken our public insurances. The ACA entrenches a system that treats healthcare as a commodity rather than a public good and that will make some investors very rich. This has renewed calls for single payer as people see how such a system would be superior in many ways.  This makes it essential for those who favor single payer to call out groups like MoveOn, who are closely tied to the Democratic Party, for their continued advocacy for the ACA as well as elected officials who claim to support single payer but who are staying silent despite the problems with Obamacare.

Keep the moral high ground and remain a movement based in principled dissent

One of the risks in this phase of the movement is becoming a member of the professional non-profit community. Moyer calls these groups ‘professional opposition organizations’ or POOs. Instead we must remain what he calls a principled dissent group. We must advocate for transformational change and not for inadequate reforms that do not solve the problem but merely make it look like the system is responding to our concerns.

During this time period the power structure will try to pull the movement into the system. Foundations may start to offer financial support.  Care must be taken here because money is needed to build the necessary grassroots infrastructure, but funding cannot have strings attached that compromise the goals of the movement.

The kind of infrastructure that is needed is grassroots organizations that understand the goals and strategy and how the various sub-issues being worked on relate to the overall goals of the movement.  Infrastructure includes training of hundreds of people who either organize grassroots groups or work with grassroots networks, or who work on the ten fronts of struggle we identified in our last article.  Additional infrastructure is needed to build movement media.  The corporate mass media will not cover the movement because their job is to make people think it has disappeared and when we have victories, they will make sure not to give the movement credit.  We need to build our own media so people in the movement can stay informed on issues and on what others in the movement are doing as well as have a tool for reaching out to the public.

In addition to remaining true to our principles, we need to be open to expanding our demands.  During this phase, as we better understand the issues we are working on, we will find that the problems run deeper than we realized.  This has shown itself in debates in the environmental movement, e.g. rather than calling for no Keystone pipeline, we need to be calling for no tar sands mining.  Similarly, rather than regulating fracking for methane gas, we need to be calling for a ban on fracking. Indeed, when the overall energy situation is looked at the movement needs to be making a broad call for the end of the extraction economy and putting in place a carbon-free, nuclear-free energy economy.

Of course, this will be ‘off the political table’ but it is the only approach that makes sense in light of the ecological destruction of extraction, the militarism caused by resource conflicts and the steps needed to combat climate change. This has led to aggressive actions by front-line environmentalists and indigenous peoples with blockades, tree-sits, mass protests and other acts of civil resistance. If the traditional groups are to remain relevant they will be pulled toward these new groups as we are beginning to see, reversing divide and rule into unite and win.

A goal is to hold the POOs accountable and to keep them from co-opting the movement’s goals and allowing the power holders to undermine the movement through false solutions. We expand on this more in our article, “Gang Green or Fresh Greens.”

Emphasize our role as ‘change agents’

During this phase of building national consensus we need to change our roles.  While we are still ‘rebels’ against the current system, our primary job in this phase is to be ‘change agents.’  Our target is mobilizing the general public, especially those involved and directly affected by current problems.  Change agents operate not by being in the public spotlight as we were during the Take Off phase when our rebel role dominated, but to be people who organize, enable and nurture others to get involved as participants.

One pitfall to avoid at this point is becoming a ‘negative rebel.’ Those who do not understand the progression and tasks of a successful social movement may become discouraged by their perceived lack of progress. They may resort to violent tactics believing that previous tactics failed. This path will actually undermine the movement by giving openings for power holders to infiltrate it and be violent in response and by scaring the public.

The role of the change agent is to encourage conversations that are open and listening.  We are not dictating that we have all the solutions, but engaging with others, providing an informed opinion and finding solutions together. And we must do more than just educate on one issue, but must show how that issue is related to other issues and the need for systemic change. This requires showing that the underlying world view of the current power structure is wrong and that a paradigm shift is needed. One way that issues get connected is by building coalitions or networks that bring people from different movements together.

The global private intelligence firm, Stratfor, has been monitoring the resistance movement and working with corporations and governments to stop it. A 2012 report said: “Once the tactics of a protest movement have been assessed as organized and sophisticated, it’s time to assess strategic weaknesses of the state that the movement can attack. Governments rule by controlling key pillars of society, through which they exercise authority over the population. These pillars include security forces (police and military), the judicial system, civil services and unions.” Stratfor knows that when change agents pull people from the pillars of power to the movement, the government has a problem. A 2013 Stratfor report says:

“When assessing a crowd, the number of protesters is not the only thing to focus on. The composition of the crowd is just as significant. If the protest comprises only students or marginalized people, it is far easier to quash. However, if members of the military and police, bureaucrats, educators, clergy and business owners begin to participate in protests, it is a sign that the protest movement is much more serious, since these people constitute the pillars that provide power to a regime and have the institutional capacity to better organize a movement that employs sophisticated tactics.”

Change agents and the movement need to not only focus on our core constituencies, but also on people who are in the power structure.  When we pull people from the power structure, the movement not only grows stronger, but the power holders get weaker.

There are signs that the power holders are worried about the growing people power of the social movement.  Recently leaked documents from Washington State show that Bank of America has a team of 20 people who troll the Internet looking for protests against the bank. The documents also show that BoA works with the Joint Terrorism Task Force and the law enforcement Fusion Center of Homeland Security as well as local police in what they call a ‘public-private partnership.’

Another end of the year report by the Information Technology firm Gartner predicts a
“much larger scale” occupy-like movement at the end of 2014 that will result in political discussions on the issues the movement is raising. Further, they warn that businesses need to avoid being seen as the culprits in the downward decline in wages and jobs or risk a “backlash in the form of buyer strikes, labor unrest and increased scrutiny of owner and executive compensation.”

Persist. This is a marathon with hurdles, not a sprint

We have come a long way. On December 16, 2010, almost a year before occupy and the day before the Arab Spring began with the Tunisian fruit vendor lighting himself on fire, we were part of a protest against the Afghanistan war in Washington, DC.  At the protest 131 people were arrested opposing the war while President Obama was inside telling the media the Afghanistan war was going well.  The theme of the protest was that we needed to develop a culture of resistance in the United States.  Now, two years later we can see that culture of resistance growing. We have come a long way.

The current stage of movement evolution is one that could last for years, even more than a decade. Or, it could be one that moves more quickly. When we organized the occupation of Washington, DC at Freedom Plaza in 2011 we researched where the people of the United States stood and discovered they were more radical than the corporate media was letting us know. We published an article We Stand With the Majority, then in the month before OWS began we updated it with The American People Could Rule Better than the Elites. Essentially, two-thirds of the American people were already questioning current policies and looking for alternatives. Perhaps this is why President Obama ran on “hope and change” because his polling and focus groups showed that is where the people were.

So, we may be further along than we realize.  This week someone sent us this meme (see picture above) – 2014 the Year Everything Changes and #RiseTogether #NoLongerIgnored.  We have no doubt 2014 is going to be an amazing year for the social-political movement that is growing daily. We are likely to see some victories, perhaps some very important ones.  There will be many victories on the road to our ultimate success. There will also be failures. We should celebrate the victories and learn from the failures.

These are exciting times to be involved with this movement. We’ve already come a long way, but the best is yet to come.

Sign up for the daily news digest of Popular Resistance, here.

This article is produced by in conjunction with AlterNet.  It is based on’s weekly newsletter reviewing the activities of the resistance movement.

Kevin Zeese, JD and Margaret Flowers, MD are participants in; they co-direct It’s Our Economy and co-host Clearing the FOG. Their twitters are @KBZeese and MFlowers8.

  • Pingback: The way forward for the popular movement in 2014 | ROAR Magazine()

  • Pingback: The Tasks Of The People-Powered Movement For 2014 | Movement Building()

  • Pingback: May 2014 Be the Year of the Peons! | Guillotine mediocrity in all its forms!()

  • AlanMacDonald

    While organizing a social movement around a large number of ‘symptom problems’ which are all caused by the “Power-holders” and the oppressing structure is useful in bringing a wide variety of ‘issues oriented’ people into the movement, it is essential at the take-off stage to make sure, as Moyer notes, that there is “Public Awareness” of the seminal ‘causal factor’ that is creating all such ‘issues and symptom problems’ — just as an effective doctor has to properly diagnose and clearly understand beyond the visible ‘symptoms’ what the underLYING or hidden ’cause’ really is before operating.

    The major problem of the entire swath of social movements in
    contemporary America (including the recent “Occupy” movement Rel 1.0)
    can be best understood by realizing that the oppressive force in America
    is not aptly or accurately called; the “corporate-state”, “security
    state”, “intelligence state”, “oligarchy”, “plutocracy”,
    “totalitarianism”, “Inverted Totalitarianism” [Wolin], “proto-fascism”,
    et al, but can only be described in the plain language of what it really
    is — a Disguised Global Empire, a highly integrated and extant (but
    hidden); corporate, finacial, militarist, media/propaganda, extra-legal,
    and Vichy political Global Empire, which has ‘captured’ and now fully
    “Occupies” our former country by hiding behind the facade of its
    modernized and dual-party Vichy sham of democracy — as surely as the
    earlier Nazi Empire treid less successfully to do in ‘captured’ and
    “Occupied” France behind the facade of that Empire’s installed, but
    crude, single-party Vichy regime.

    Until the seminal truth and (as Moyer notes) “Public Awareness” of
    the DGE that is headquartered in the US and which is only ‘posing’ as
    the USG is fully exposed — as Snowden, Hammond, Manning, et al. have
    been starting to expose this Empire — the probability of any social
    movement being effective against this Disguised Global Empire (before it
    is revealed to the people) is quite low.

    “As Zygmunt Bauman hauntingly puts it, “In the case of an ailing social
    order, the absence of an adequate diagnosis…is a crucial, perhaps
    decisive, part of the disease.”13 (which is this case is the pathology
    of Empire Cancer)

    Berman, Morris (2011-02-07). Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire (p. 22). Norton. Kindle Edition.

    And in America today the disease is the ‘Cancer of Empire’ and this
    DGE Empire has not yet been properly diagnosed as the cancer!

    The greatest vulnerability and fear of the ‘power-holders’ (the
    “Empire-thinkers”) in a Disguised Global Empire is to lose the greatest
    weapon of the Empire, which is — just as it is for all predators,
    parasites, and cancers — its Disguise

    Best luck and love to the fast expanding ‘Occupy the Empire’
    educational and non-violent revolutionary movement against this
    deceitful and Disguised Global EMPIRE, which can’t yet be easily
    identified as wearing Red Coats, Red Stars, nor funny looking Nazi

    Liberty, democracy, justice, and equality
    Violent (‘Vichy’ disguised)

    Alan MacDonald
    Sanford, Maine

    We don’t merely have a “Big Money”/Citizens United problem, or a
    domestic tyranny and NSA SPYING problem, or a gun/fear problem, or an
    MIC problem, or an ‘Austerity’ problem, or an EXPANDING WARS problem, or a ‘drone assassinations’ problem, or a vast income & wealth
    inequality problem, or a Wall Street ‘looting’ problem, or a Global
    Warming and environmental death-spiral problem, or the world’s largest
    political prisoner problem, or a crappy un-healthy insurance
    problem, or, or, or …ad nauseam — but what we REALLY have is a hidden
    VEMPIRE cancerous tumor of GLOBAL EMPIRE which is the prime CAUSE of all these underlying, related, and mere ‘symptom problems’.

  • Pingback: Creative Resistance: Why We Need to Incorporate Art Into Our Activism » Clearing the FOG Radio()

  • Pingback: Creative Resistance Art Activism()

  • Pingback: The Debate: Independence or Partisanship » Clearing the FOG Radio()

  • Pingback: Waves of Nationwide Actions Planned at Key Historic Moment » Clearing the FOG Radio()

  • Pingback: Progressives Independents Democrats()

  • Pingback: Immigrants Accuse SEIU Of Using Marshalls & Police Against Immigration Activists | PopularResistance.Org()

  • Pingback: Three Years Later, What Has Come of Occupy Wall Street? | PopularResistance.Org()

  • Pingback: The Debate: Independence or Partisanship | PopularResistance.Org()

  • Pingback: Why Liberals Have To Be Radicals | PopularResistance.Org()

  • Pingback: Newsletter: Transformation – Elections & Movements | PopularResistance.Org()

  • Pingback: To Understand the Presidential Primaries, Recognize the Impact of Movements  Dark Politricks()

  • Pingback: Analysis: To Understand The Presidential Primaries, Recognize The Impact Of Movements()

  • Pingback: To Understand The Presidential Primaries, Recognize The Impact Of Movements |

  • Pingback: National Consensus Builds For Transformational Change: Action Needed | PopularResistance.Org()

  • Pingback: Newsletter: US Democracy Crisis Creates Illegitimate Political System | PopularResistance.Org()

  • RickD

    It has been 5 1/2 years since this article was posted here. I see no signs that anything within it has come to fruition or even moved a bit in the direction it advocated.

    If anything people are more alienated, more splintered , more separated, less involved today than we even were back then.

  • kevinzeese

    You must not be paying attention.

    We stopped the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would have been a major corporate power grab. Increased minimum wages are being put in place across the country and many of the leading Dem presidential candidates support an increase in the federal minimum wage. The movement of single payer healthcare, improved Medicare for all, has become consensus in the Democratic Party. Confronting climate change, indludind a Green New Deal, is also becoming an issue being put forward by top Dem candidates, so is tax cuts on the wealthy. Police are being prosecuted, for the first time in years, for violence against citizens. Legal adult use of marijuana is becoming the norm, medical use is already the norm in most of the country. Thesese are just a few quick examples.

    The movement is larger now than it was during Occupy. It is not as concentrated nor is it sleeping outside in public, so it is less seen but it is larger on many fronts of struggle.

    While elections are heavily manipulated in the US with two Wall Street-funded parties, the debate in the Democratic Party has shifted left.

    It is sometimes hard when we are in the midst of change to see it happening around us. We see the 2020s as a decade of transformation because many issues are at crises levels, and the popular movement is growing and getting more sophisticated. Change is neve a linear process, so there are ups and downs, but if we continue to educate and organize the movement, the next ten years could be filled with significant positive change. But, we have to do the work because there are other forces pulling in the opposite direction.

  • RickD

    Some of what you offer is fact, other wishful thinking I fear. Universal health care, Mr. Zeese, is hardly a consensus within that party, in fact its leadership continues to speak, not to how to achieve it, but how expense it would be to do so, hardly consensus. Same with the Green New Deal.

    Police are getting away with murder still, and in growing numbers is seems. I do not wish to oppose your optimism sir, honestly, such is necessary among activists as I well know.

    But so is realism.

  • kevinzeese

    Medicare for all is consensus among Democratic voters with polls showing 85% support, same with the Green New Deal, taxing wealth, among other issues. Of course, some party leaders continue to balance funding sources who oppose those issues, with what the voters want. The voters need to keep organizing and demanding change.

    If the Dems nominate a progressive candidate like Sanders or Warren, the movement will need to push them because those who profit from the current situation will fight to stop change.

    If the Dems nominate someone like Biden or Buttigieg who oppose these policies, the movement will have to pressure them to change.

    People power is the key so we are focued on continuing to build the movement for these issues.

    Of course, the police violence problem has not been solved, but progress is being made. Police violence goes back to the founding of police as slave patrols to caputre run-away slaves. Violence has been part of policing for all of US history. Progress is being made but more organizing is needed.

    Change is not like turning on a light. It is a process, all too slow. Change is not measured in months or even years. It takes a decade or two for movements to create the transformation that is needed.

    You might find our Popular Resistance school of interest, How Social Transformation Occurs. It is eight one-hour classes with lots of suggested reading. We do not charge for it. We did the school because people were asking what they should do and how to make the changes they wanted. We see the next decade as when movements for economic, racial and environmental justice as well as peace have great potential but we need people educated about how movements work and what they can do. You can review it at It is linked in the banner above.

    We realize how difficult and slow change is, especially the kind of transformational changes that are needed. The movement continues to grow on many fronts and the crisis situations we are facing also grow. This combination is what is going to make the next decade one of major change. I hope you do what you can to help make it happen.

  • RickD

    Please Mr. Zeese, consistency is AS necessary as accuracy, with all due respect to you.. First you stated :

    “The movement of single payer healthcare, improved Medicare for all, has become consensus in the Democratic Party”

    When confronted with my opposing opinion you then shifted to “democratic voters” favoring universal health care, not at all your first contention sir.
    I believe the democratic party, with darn few exceptions, opposes the progressive agenda or, worse, gives it lip service only.

    In actual fact the American people consistently poll on the side of progressive agenda items yet we see damn little progress towards any of those goals. That is because our two party system is far too invested in the status quo to finance its way too expensive election campaigns, uses future employment as highly paid second careers as lobbyists as well.

    Look, I do not wish to come off as hostile to your position or to you, yourself, I respect your efforts and much of them are mirrored in my own. I will shortly achieve my 77th year, most spent, since my return from Vietnam, in working actively towards peace, against our nations decline into fascism ( the merging of corporate and governance), and especially the growth of a multiple party system. So I understand first hand how slow progress can be.

    The last sixteen years have been spent working almost exclusively on community issues and needs, and, lucky to have been associated with a fine group of motivated neighbors, we have achieved much in that space of time.

    Those efforts include achieving free school lunches for the disadvantaged, a lending library free to all, food on the weekend for those children who would otherwise have none the entire weekend, so terrible but an awful truth here in the land of the wealthy, a dog park for residents, assisting in the creation of a park honoring the Japanese Americans so dishonored in WW2. We successfully campaigned for a sound wall for those of our neighbors whose back yards abutted a newly widened freeway, and that was quite the struggle…;-)

    Also, through the advocacy for a POP program (problem oriented policing) our monthly meetings are attended by both the sherrifs office and highway patrol, as well as representatives of our local supervisor, generally her chief of staff. That has resulted in far better relations between our police and the community.

    But along with optimism must come realism. The police, in general, have become more violent, and less liable to have to answer for their crimes. We are a far more splintered society now than we were a few short years ago as well. Our politicians, especially on the national stage have become less, not more, responsive to the needs of our population and we seem to be inevitably sinking into third world status as well.

    Do not think, Mr. Zeese, that I disparage your efforts, I admire them, honestly. I believe that folks like you will be responsible for changes for the better, but , if we are to achieve that we must face reality.

  • kevinzeese

    Sorry I was not clear my first comment on Democratic consensus. I never think in terms of leaders of political parties but in terms of people because it is the people, when they are organized, who make change happen. Elected leaders follow the people when the people are organized and active. Popular Resistance focuses on people’s movements. We do not focus on elections as we know US “democracy” is seriously flawed by the two party system with two parties that represent Wall Street and war because they are funded by millionaires and billionaires.

    I am not a Democrat (or Republican) and have not voted for either of the corporate duopoly parties in about 30 years. I agree they only give lip service to the people’s agenda but if the people insist they can win, and we have won many battles and will win more as we continue to organize, even though it is frustrating and slow.

    I advocate for community control of police. Polices like community policing just bring more police into communities that are too heavily policed already. The community needs to control the police in their community. Residents know who are the violent, racist and harassing officers and should have the power to remove them before they do serious damage. The movement for commuiity control of police is an an early stage and needs a lot of growth before it can have an impact.

  • RickD

    The devil is in the details. The POP program to which I spoke has been wildly successful and is growing elsewhere as well ( we cannot take credit for it, just for adopting it and seeing its merits). It brings no additional policing to any area, ours being an unincorporated community with sherrifs not police, it does bring closer ties between the community and its law enforcers. I would hope one as obviously intelligent as you would do your due diligence about this.

    I think we have exhausted this particular discussion, one I found to be enjoyable, and I do respect your opinions. Perhaps we will meet again on another issue at another time. We both seek better for our nation and , more importantly , we both work towards said goals.