The Untold Story Of John Bolton’s Campaign For War With Iran

| Educate!

Above Photo: John Bolton (Gage Skidmore/Flikr)

The selection of John Bolton as President Trump’s national security advisor signals the administration is seriously considering escalating US wars. The combination of Bolton and nomination of Mike Pompeo as secretary of state means Trump will be getting advice from extreme war hawks. Bolton was an architect of the false weapons of mass destruction claims that led to the disastrous US invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Even the New York Times, which has helped lay the groundwork for US wars writes in an editorial “There are few people more likely than Mr. Bolton is to lead the country into war. His selection is a decision that is as alarming as any Mr. Trump has made. His selection, along with the nomination of the hard-line C.I.A. director, Mike Pompeo, as secretary of state, shows the degree to which Mr. Trump is indulging his worst nationalistic instincts.”

Two countries of most immediate concern are North Korea and Iran. Bolton has called for a US military strike against North Korea under the false legal claim that the US is under threat of immediate attack from North Korea. The Times points out “Bolton has largely disdained diplomacy and arms control in favor of military solutions; no one worked harder to blow up the 1994 agreement under which North Korea’s plutonium program was frozen for nearly eight years in exchange for heavy fuel oil and other assistance.” With the appointments of Mike Pompeo and John Bolton there is little hope that the upcoming talks with North Korea, if they happen, will be productive. The purpose of such a meeting will not be to negotiate peace, but to deliver a US ultimatum and create an excuse for military escalation.

On Iran, naming Bolton indicates Trump is likely to pull out of the Iran nuclear agreement by May 12, the deadline for Trump to waive sanctions. Mike Pompeo also opposes the Iran nuclear agreement. James Mattis, the defense secretary, is the only Cabinet level official who opposes leaving the deal. Bolton has said “To stop Iran’s bomb, bomb Iran.” Bolton has called for regime change for many years. He brags about his position in this speech.

But, Iran and North Korea are only two targets on Bolton’s hit list. Steve Lendman writesBolton is militantly hostile to Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and Syria, among other nations on his target list.” He has called for open hostility between the US against Russia and China. Lendman points out “In February, he called for a ‘decidedly disproportionate,’ anti-Russia cyber offensive. He urged Trump to let Putin ‘hear the rumble of artillery and NATO tank tracks conducting more joint field exercises with Ukraine’s military.’”

On China “He advocates confronting nonexistent Chinese “aggressiveness…shak(ing) up” Washington’s relationship with Beijing – urging greater toughness along with closer ties to Taiwan.” He even risks military confrontation urging the US to challenge Chinese maritime claims in the South China and East China Seas.

With the new Trump war cabinet and other appointments, the US is likely to see escalation of military conflict and perhaps even a war against rivals Russia and China. Bolton does not require senate confirmation and will began as national security advisor on April 9.  KZ

Everyone knows Bolton is a hawk. Less understood is how he labored in secret to drive Washington and Tehran apart.

In my reporting on U.S.-Israeli policy, I have tracked numerous episodes in which the United States and/or Israel made moves that seemed to indicate preparations for war against Iran. Each time—in 2007, in 2008, and again in 2011—those moves, presented in corporate media as presaging attacks on Tehran, were actually bluffs aimed at putting pressure on the Iranian government.

But the strong likelihood that Donald Trump will now choose John Bolton as his next national security advisor creates a prospect of war with Iran that is very real. Bolton is no ordinary neoconservative hawk. He has been obsessed for many years with going to war against the Islamic Republic, calling repeatedly for bombing Iran in his regular appearances on Fox News, without the slightest indication that he understands the consequences of such a policy.

His is not merely a rhetorical stance: Bolton actively conspired during his tenure as the Bush administration’s policymaker on Iran from 2002 through 2004 to establish the political conditions necessary for the administration to carry out military action.

More than anyone else inside or outside the Trump administration, Bolton has already influenced Trump to tear up the Iran nuclear deal. Bolton parlayed his connection with the primary financier behind both Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump himself—the militantly Zionist casino magnate Sheldon Adelson—to get Trump’s ear last October, just as the president was preparing to announce his policy on the Iran nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). He spoke with Trump by phone from Las Vegas after meeting with Adelson.

It was Bolton who persuaded Trump to commit to specific language pledging to pull out of the JCPOA if Congress and America’s European allies did not go along with demands for major changes that were clearly calculated to ensure the deal would fall apart.

Although Bolton was passed over for the job of secretary of state, he now appears to have had the inside track for national security advisor. Trump met with Bolton on March 6 and told him, “We need you here, John,” according to a Bolton associate. Bolton said he would only take secretary of state or national security advisor, whereupon Trump promised, “I’ll call you really soon.” Trump then replaced Secretary of State Rex Tillerson with former CIA director Mike Pompeo, after which White House sources leaked to the media Trump’s intention to replace H.R. McMaster within a matter of weeks.

The only other possible candidate for the position mentioned in media accounts is Keith Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general who was acting national security advisor after General Michael Flynn was ousted in February 2017.

Bolton’s high-profile advocacy of war with Iran is well known. What is not at all well known is that, when he was under secretary of state for arms control and international security, he executed a complex and devious strategy aimed at creating the justification for a U.S. attack on Iran. Bolton sought to convict the Islamic Republic in the court of international public opinion of having a covert nuclear weapons program using a combination of diplomatic pressure, crude propaganda, and fabricated evidence.

Despite the fact that Bolton was technically under the supervision of Secretary of State Colin Powell, his actual boss in devising and carrying out that strategy was Vice President Dick Cheney. Bolton was also the administration’s main point of contact with the Israeli government, and with Cheney’s backing, he was able to flout normal State Department rules by taking a series of trips to Israel in 2003 and 2004 without having the required clearance from the State Department’s Bureau for Near Eastern Affairs.

Thus, at the very moment that Powell was saying administration policy was not to attack Iran, Bolton was working with the Israelis to lay the groundwork for just such a war. During a February 2003 visit, Bolton assured Israeli officials in private meetings that he had no doubt the United States would attack Iraq, and that after taking down Saddam, it would deal with Iran, too, as well as Syria.

During multiple trips to Israel, Bolton had unannounced meetings, including with the head of Mossad, Meir Dagan, without the usual reporting cable to the secretary of state and other relevant offices. Judging from that report on an early Bolton visit, those meetings clearly dealt with a joint strategy on how to bring about political conditions for an eventual U.S. strike against Iran.

Mossad played a very aggressive role in influencing world opinion on the Iranian nuclear program. In the summer of 2003, according to journalists Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins in their book The Nuclear Jihadist, Meir Dagan created a new Mossad office tasked with briefing the world’s press on alleged Iranian efforts to achieve a nuclear weapons capability. The new unit’s responsibilities included circulating documents from inside Iran as well from outside, according to Frantz and Collins.

Bolton’s role in a joint U.S.-Israeli strategy, as he outlines in his own 2007 memoir, was to ensure that the Iran nuclear issue would be moved out of the International Atomic Energy Agency and into the United Nations Security Council. He was determined to prevent IAEA director general Mohamed ElBaradei from reaching an agreement with Iran that would make it more difficult for the Bush administration to demonize Tehran as posing a nuclear weapons threat. Bolton began accusing Iran of having a covert nuclear weapons program in mid-2003, but encountered resistance not only from ElBaradei and non-aligned states, but from Britain, France, and Germany as well.

Bolton’s strategy was based on the claim that Iran was hiding its military nuclear program from the IAEA, and in early 2004, he came up with a dramatic propaganda ploy: he sent a set of satellite images to the IAEA showing sites at the Iranian military reservation at Parchin that he claimed were being used for tests to simulate nuclear weapons. Bolton demanded that the IAEA request access to inspect those sites and leaked his demand to the Associated Press in September 2004. In fact, the satellite images showed nothing more than bunkers and buildings for conventional explosives testing.

Bolton was apparently hoping the Iranian military would not agree to any IAEA inspections based on such bogus claims, thus playing into his propaganda theme of Iran’s “intransigence” in refusing to answer questions about its nuclear program. But in 2005 Iran allowed the inspectors into those sites and even let them choose several more sites to inspect. The inspectors found no evidence of any nuclear-related activities.

The U.S.-Israeli strategy would later hit the jackpot, however, when a large cache of documents supposedly from a covert source within Iran’s nuclear weapons program surfaced in autumn 2004. The documents, allegedly found on the laptop computer of one of the participants, included technical drawings of a series of efforts to redesign Iran’s Shahab-3 missile to carry what appeared to be a nuclear weapon.

But the whole story of the so-called “laptop documents” was a fabrication. In 2013, a former senior German official revealed the true story to this writer: the documents had been given to German intelligence by the Mujahedin E Khalq, the anti-Iran armed group that was well known to have been used by Mossad to “launder” information the Israelis did not want attributed to themselves. Furthermore, the drawings showing the redesign that were cited as proof of a nuclear weapons program were clearly done by someone who didn’t know that Iran had already abandoned the Shahab-3’s nose cone for an entirely different design.

Mossad had clearly been working on those documents in 2003 and 2004 when Bolton was meeting with Meir Dagan. Whether Bolton knew the Israelis were preparing fake documents or not, it was the Israeli contribution towards establishing the political basis for an American attack on Iran for which he was the point man. Bolton reveals in his memoirs that this Cheney-directed strategy took its cues from the Israelis, who told Bolton that the Iranians were getting close to “the point of no return.” That was point, Bolton wrote, at which “we could not stop their progress without using force.”

Cheney and Bolton based their war strategy on the premise that the U.S. military would be able to consolidate control over Iraq quickly. Instead the U.S. occupation bogged down and never fully recovered. Cheney proposed taking advantage of a high-casualty event in Iraq that could be blamed on Iran to attack an IRGC base in Iran in the summer of 2007. But the risk that pro-Iranian Shiite militias in Iraq would retaliate against U.S. troops was a key argument against the proposal.

The Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs of Staff were also well aware that Iran had the capability to retaliate directly against U.S. forces in the region, including against warships in the Strait of Hormuz. They had no patience for Cheney’s wild ideas about more war.

That Pentagon caution remains unchanged. But two minds in the White House unhinged from reality could challenge that wariness—and push the United States closer towards a dangerous war with Iran.

  • AlanMacDonald

    The most powerful thing said during the “March for our
    Lives”was by Cameron Kasky when he simply shouted:

    “Welcome to the Revolution!”

    What the kids need to learn and have the courage to say
    in defining this Revolution, this peaceful “Political
    Revolution”— which Bernie either did not understand or did
    not have the courage to more completely define in a short action
    sentence with a damn ‘OBJECT’ is what the Revoluti on is ‘Against’
    — which is “like totally” that the Revolution is against
    this EMPIRE.

    As I rightly criticized Bernie, about his mere two-word
    sound-biteof a campaign slogan: “Political Revolution”
    against what,Bernie? against What TF, Bernie??

    If the kids have more guts than Bernie, and if they are willing
    to learn and understand the this damn EMPIRE is actually the
    proximate CAUSE of; the “Gun Issue” and the “War
    Issue” and the “Wall Street Looting Issue “, and the
    “Domestic Spying Issue”, and the “Vast Inequality
    Issue”, and the “Racism Issue” —– then, and only
    then, with the kids’ courage and knowledge can we get anything
    DONE!

    Garth, — if we don’t start a peaceful “Political Revolution”
    against this damn disguised global capitalist EMPIRE BY JUNE — this
    effin faux-Emperor Trump will light-up the whole Middle East in a WAR
    the likes of which we have never seen!

    Emperor Trump was shamelessly shilling selling BILLIONS of dollars
    of weapons to the Saudis in the effin OVAL OFFICE.

    Get real.

    As I shouted to everyone in the March in Portland Maine —- “If
    we don’t go beyond the little guns that kill little people (students)
    here, the 10,000s of thousands of really REALLY BIG weapons from the
    “Merchants of Death”, like Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon,
    Gruman, et al. will be killing millions in the Middle East and we’ll
    be protesting in June about the next world war!”

    My only protest/marching two-sided sign simply reads:

    “DUMP EMPEROR TRUMP” on the front side, and

    “We can’t be an EMPIRE” on the back side.

  • kevinzeese

    We will not have a revolt against empire by June. Not sure why that deadline but more people are learning and understanding the nature of the United States.

    As to the youth and the March for Our Lives, it is evident from the march this weekend in DC and around the country that the Dems are using the gun issue for their 2018 election to help create the Blue Wave they hope for. These youth have been part of something big and had an excellent organizing experience. Big Democratic Party donors have given hundreds of thousands to their cause, tht is not typical of revolutionary or resistance movements. My hope is that being part of this successful event and related events encourages them be activists on this and many other issues.

    Their rhetoric — the adults did not fix it — could be applied to almost every issue the country faces. The adults to not fix climate change, the wealth divide, never ending war, the cost of college, the debt of most Americans, poverty retirement, a failed healthcare system, unsafe food, destruction of the ocean . . . and on and on. This also applies to the empire issue which is your focus.

    Will they be radicalized to see the system-wide change we need? Or, will they be co-opted into the Democratic Party and be mere reformers, often making things worse rather than better and serving the interests of Wall Street and war which control the Democratic Party?

    For us, one of our jobs is to educate these youth (like we need to do with all people) so they see how the gun issue is one example of many. The 2020s will be a decade when the long list of issues on which the bi-partisan government has failed and made things worse or ignored the problem completely will be so bad they are impossible to ignore. The popular movement is growing and these youth will be in their 20s at a key age to work for transformational change Will they be part of the transformational resistance movement or part of the status quo Democratic Party? How we respond and what we do will be one of the factors that answers that question.

  • GeoRip

    It seems to me that it is time those PTB who are opposed to war with Iran send another open letter to Iran along the lines of the infamous Sen Cotton letter. The purpose of the new letter would be to set the stage for extracting ourselves as quickly as possible from any war that Trump begins, once he is removed from office. I am hardly the person to suggest what might be said in such a letter, but the letter from Sen Cotton certainly rattled those in power and if we could accomplish that perhaps we would have had positive effect. Anything to slow down or stop these madmen.

  • Robert H. Stiver

    Be afraid; be very afraid. Gareth Porter skillfully draws the Zionist-Bolton connection to a host of nightmarish situations. I am disturbed that the lead-in makes not one mention of Israel (the Zionist entity so-called Israel), always the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

    Iran first, then Syria, then North Korea, then Russia? Be very afraid.

    As always, I reiterate: At the end of every day, Palestine Is Still THE Issue!