This Is Everything That Is Wrong With Mainstream Feminism

| Educate!

Outlets like MSNBC and Politico have been excitedly running headlines titled “The military-industrial complex is now run by women” and “How women took over the military-industrial complex“. Apparently four of America’s five top defense contractors are now women, whose names I will not bother to learn or report on because I do not care.

These headlines are being derided by skeptics of the establishment mindset for the cartoonish self-parody of the corporate liberal mindset that they so clearly are, and rightly so. Pretty much everything in American mainstream liberalism ultimately boils down to advancing mass murder, exploitation and ecocide for profit while waving a “yay diversity” banner so that the NPR crowd can feel good about themselves while signing off on it. But the fact that these stories exist and have an audience can also be blamed more specifically on the failures of mainstream feminism.

A lot of men (and the occasional cultishly servile woman) like to bitch about the problem with modern feminism as though it is something that hurts men, threatens men, demonizes men, or robs men of their place in society or anything else they feel entitled to. This is all dopey nonsense which amounts to nothing other than a childish temper tantrum over men losing control over women that they never should have had in the first place; it’s people whining about losing their slaves. That imaginary piffle is not what is wrong with mainstream feminism. What is wrong with mainstream feminism is exemplified perfectly in a mass media parade celebrating the rise of women to the top of the most depraved industry on earth.

The problem that true feminism seeks to address is not that there aren’t enough women at the top of the corporate ladder, or that Americans refused to elect a woman to do the bombing, exploiting and oppressing in 2016. The problem has always been that we’re trying to value women with a value system created by a few very powerful men. By leaving in place the value system created by patriarchy (i.e. capitalism), we are now valuing women but only for their ability to play men’s games. Nobody has ever become a billionaire by being a mother, even the very best mother in the world, and nobody ever will because capitalism was designed by men, for men, to value men’s qualities. This has created a species-threatening imbalance because inequality is baked in to the system. When men reluctantly allowed women out of their house-shaped cages in the sixties, they did so on the condition that they would not change a thing about themselves. Women could play, but it was the women who had to change. As usual.

It’s interesting to go back to seminal texts like Germaine Greer’s “The Female Eunuch” and see how much time feminists spent back then thinking about how women could be paid for domestic and child-rearing work. Fifty years ago, feminists of the time could easily see how financial abuse runs rampant through marriages because women don’t get paid for the majority of their work. They could see how if women were to ever be truly free, that had to be fixed. If you’re not getting paid, then you’re not able to leave, and if you can’t leave, you’re a slave. Despite all of feminism’s gains, today if you dare suggest that women be paid for bearing children, you will be jeered at. It was decided somewhere along the line that, fine, you can be a fake man if you want to, but don’t expect us to value YOU. Men refused to value women’s work, which is why most of it is still essentially slavery. And that was a crucial, planet-threatening mistake.

By refusing to value women and what skills they naturally bring, humanity continued to not value the meta work of the feminine. We continued to not value the health of our environment, the health of our social cohesion, the mental health of each other. By refusing to place a hard and fast value on cleaning, healing, networking, redistributing goods, disappearing problems, restoring, reusing, collaboration, happiness and health, we are strengthening all their opposites.

Many men will knee-jerk argue that they too are slaves to the corporatocracy, and that’s true. That’s what you get when you don’t change a valuing system that was created by slave-owners to distract their slaves from killing them and to keep them working anyway. That’s what you get when you insist everyone change to suit a system that was created by power to keep power in place. We laugh about how indigenous people were fooled into handing over vast swathes of their land for handfuls of shiny shells, while we hand over our labor, our land, our rights and our freedoms for paper rectangles, today.

True feminism doesn’t hold that the world would be better off if women ran things; shifting control from one gender to the other would change very little as long as the current valuing system remains in place. True feminism holds that all of humanity needs to change its valuing system to one which rewards feminine work as much as masculine, instead of only rewarding women when they succeed at climbing the ladder of the patriarchal paradigm.

Women controlling the military-industrial complex is not feminism, it’s toxic masculinity. It’s the fruit of the sick valuing system that is blackening our air, poisoning our water, filling the oceans with plastic, bulldozing the rainforests, and marching us toward the brink of nuclear armageddon. True feminism means turning away from the toxic valuing system which elevates the most ambitious sociopaths and toward one which values empathy, collaboration, nurturing and peace instead.


The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitterthrowing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypalpurchasing some of my sweet new merchandisebuying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

  • subcomandante Felix

    A good analysis with one flaw – it’s not about valuing “women’s work” by reinforcing the patriarchally created separation between men and women’s work. What we should be talking about are two dialectically opposite value systems based on the way society is organized – either horizontally or hierarchically. It is a social value system that is not based on gender but on functions needed to reproduce and maintain a healthy, vibrant, ecologically sustainable human society. One value system is based on what is good for the individual the other is based on what is good for society. For example a society organized horizontally values cooperation, caring, sharing, compassion, nonviolent conflict resolution and self-governance based on consensus. Likewise, hierarchically organized societies, as we have now, are based on values of competition, domination, private accumulation, violent conflict resolution and governance by the men on top, who rule for and over us.

  • dopfa

    Thank you SO MUCH for this concise, articulate explanation of real feminism. Women who rise to power to profit from the slaughter of innocents are traitors of feminism. Becoming a corporate war-monger from patriarchal hell goes against every feminist value there is.

    We need real feminist leaders like Winona LaDuke, Vandana Shiva, Gayle McLaughlin (“Winning Richmond”), Naomi Kline, and millions of other strong, feminist-valued women and men for the matriarchal movement it’s going to take to heal Mother Earth from Her near fatal testosterone poisoning.

  • potshot

    Thanks for publishing this. She’s a brilliant thinker, writer and also video maker. Synchronistically I wanted to look her up today and read some of her stuff. But I’d forgotten her last name.

  • dopfa

    So true! But the problem is that patriarchal societies tend more toward hierarchy, and matriarchal societies tend more toward cooperation. Like the radical difference between patriarchal chimpanzees, and matriarchal bonobos, often referred to as the “make love, not war” sets of apes. New dominant male chimps will commit infanticide to make sure their own progeny dominate. Bonobos have sex every ten minutes to relieve stress, so nobody knows whose babies belong to whom and all are cared for communally. A group of females rule with one dominant female, but none of the group, male or female, are mistreated, like “competing” infants being murdered, and other horrific patriarchal behavior.

  • subcomandante Felix

    All societies are hybrids between the hierarchical and horizontal. That is the contradiction at the heart of human existence. We exist as individual entities but are totally dependent on others.

  • Jon

    Good insights from all–author and comments. Much to appreciate and to rectify. The revolution will not be robotized!

  • Thesseli


  • subcomandante Felix

    Politics is fundamentally about how a society goes about achieving some sort of balance between what is good for the individual and what is good for society. Our current society is pathologically unbalanced favoring individual males at the top of the hierarchy – it’s call the patriarchy.