TiSA May Be Even Greater Threat Than TTIP

| Educate!

Above Photo: Annette Dubois/Flickr

Note: Now that TTIP seems finished with major European powers calling for an end to negotiations; and TPP seems stalled in Congress, we need to educate and mobilize to stop the biggest agreement of the Obama trade agenda, the Trade in Services Agenda (TiSA).

TiSA is a blueprint for global privatization, to turn public services into commodities for big business profits

  • Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) could lock in privatisation and increase ability of big business to call the shots on health, education and basic utilities
  • Rights of some migrant workers could regress to system similar to Saudi Arabia and Qatar
  • UK likely to emulate Norway signing up as individual nation post-Brexit

A global trade deal currently being negotiated in secret and involving 50 different countries could prove to be a serious threat to public services according to a briefing published today by campaign group Global Justice Now.

The Trade In Services Agreement (TISA)  is a proposed international trade treaty between 23 parties, including the European Union and the United States. Unlike most trade deals, TISA is about services, not goods. The briefing argues that this means it will affect areas like labour rights, banking regulation and whether public services like electricity and water are run for public good or private benefit.

Nick Dearden the director of Global  Justice Now said:

“This deal is a threat to the very concept of public services. It is a turbo-charged privatisation pact, based on the idea that, rather than serving the public interest, governments must step out of the way and allow corporations to ‘get on with it’. Of particular concern, we fear TiSA will include clauses that will prevent governments taking public control of strategic services, and inhibit regulation of the very banks that created the financial crash. TISA will also affect countries that haven’t even had the opportunity to develop decent public services like Pakistan. No wonder Uruguay has already walked away from the talks. We urge MEPs to tell the European Union to do the same.

“Millions of people across the EU voiced their opposition to toxic trade deals like TTIP and TISA. A broad coalition of trade unions, civil society groups and progressive politicians are coming together to make sure that we put a stop to TISA as well as TTIP – both of them enormous corporate power grabs at the expense of democracy.”

The briefing, A blueprint for global privatisation argues that:

  • TISA would lock in privatisation of public services. TISA contains mechanisms, such as ‘ratchet’and ‘standstill’ clauses, that make it much harder to reverse privatisations and will allow greater market access for foreign companies;
  • TISA would be terrible for the climate. TISA entrenches the idea of technological neutrality on energy policy. This could stop countries favouring renewables over coal, oil and gas;
  • TISA will mean more casino capitalism. TISA will undermine efforts to regulate the financial sector and avoid another crisis;
  • TISA threatens online privacy. TISA promises to hand much more power to the likes of Google and Microsoft to move personal data across borders to countries with lax data protection laws;
  • TISA will be especially damaging to countries in the global south. TISA includes countries like Pakistan that could be hindered in developing public services. It also poses a threat to countries outside TISA, because, once approved, rich countries will seek to impose TISA-style measures globally through the WTO;
  • TISA could mean a rollback on the rights of migrant workers. Proposals being negotiated under TISA mean that some migrant workers may end up being categorised as ‘independent service suppliers’ and will consequently not have rights to things like the minimum wage or be allowed to join a union.  Workers’ presence in a country could also be tied to their employer. This form of indentured labour is in effect in countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar and has resulted in horrific working conditions under unscrupulous employers.

Nick Dearden added,

“Many people were persuaded to leave the EU on the grounds they would be ‘taking back control’ of our economic policy. But if we sign up to TISA, our ability to control our economy – to regulate, to protect public services, to fight climate change – are all massively reduced. In effect, we would be handing large swathes of policy making to big business.

“Two of the biggest challenges facing society right now are dealing with the climate crisis and trying to tame the unruly banks and financial markets that have caused so much damage to the global economy. What’s being proposed under TISA would massively restrict the ability of governments to take action on either front, at a time when flexible and effective policy intervention is so badly needed.”

  • Dust of the Earth

    My goodness, these so-called “trade agreements” just keep coming, don’t they? I fear that the only way to stop them for good is to reduce the power of all corporations (primarily the transnational and/or really big ones) by a massive global boycott, which I do not see happening in the near future. Even I, who am aware of which products/companies to avoid, find it impossible to eliminate everything. For example, I currently live in a very rural area (for work) and must drive a car (fossil fuels) to get anywhere at all (besides my job – I live on site) unless I want to walk 10 miles to the nearest town for groceries in the tiny conventional grocery store which sells only processed junk, factory-farmed meat, and conventional produce which doesn’t look too good anyway (I actually normally shop in a town almost an hour’s drive away for at least some organics and a better produce selection). Zero farmers markets in a 100-mile radius. I do the best I can, but how can I expect others to boycott everything if even I find it impossible? How can we stop the corporations’ power when the majority see nothing wrong?

  • Aer O’Head

    What’s need is to somehow curtain their political power, which mostly consists of legal forms of bribery, such as we’re seeing with the Clinton Foundation, think tanks, lobbyists, etc. Only through public awareness and keeping a close eye on our “leaders” can we hope to limit the power of the corporations.

  • chetdude

    And there’s a seamless thread leading from the Powell Memo of 1971’s “suggestions” for the U.S.Chamber of Commerce which led to the richly endowed counter-revolution of the Plutocrat/Corporate Class against the Communitarianism of the New Deal, in order to re-institute the Golden Age of the late 1880s to the benefit of the point 1 of 1%…

    The first major victory was the 1st Reagan Administration in 1981. The entire neoliberal, global capitalist agenda which includes these execrable “investment” protection devices, the evisceration of the global Working Class and the Forever War(tm) to help justify and distract attention from this pattern of global theft and destruction…

    Is that cheap plastic crap in Mal-Wart, a new iPhone every year and that underpriced, undernourishing fossil-fueled “food” (eviscerating real farmers) really worth it?