US Allows Poisons In Food Not Allowed In The UK

| Educate!

Above Photo: From Dailymail.co.uk

  • Vani Hari, aka the Food Babe, describes herself as a healthy-living activist
  • The North Carolina-based blogger routinely calls out shady ingredients
  • She recently showed the discrepancies between ingredients of packaged food sold commonly in U.S. and U.K.
  • She singled out brands like Cadburys, Quakers and Kelloggs
  • Vani, 38, regularly takes on large corporations over their use of certain additives
  • She has previously came under fire for having no science/nutrition background

A ‘food activist’ has called out the discrepancies in ingredient listings on the same packaged products when they are sold in the U.S. versus the U.K.

Vani Hari, who goes by the moniker The Food Babe online, showed the differences between common bodega goods like chips and soda and how they are formulated on each side of the Atlantic.

The author and campaigner, 38, shared her findings with her audience, who were horrified to see ingredients like the preservative BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) and artificial colorings in products sold to American consumers while the British versions – and Australian and Canadian – come without.

Yikes! A packet of Doritos sold in America, left, is shown to contain controversial chemical compounds like ‘Red 40, Blue 1 and Yellow 5’ – but they aren’t used on the U.K. version

Chocolate surprise: A comparison shows the use of artificial Yellow 6 in Creme Eggs sold in the U.S., whereas in Britain paprika extract is usedChocolate surprise: A comparison shows the use of artificial Yellow 6 in Creme Eggs sold in the U.S., whereas in Britain paprika extract is used

Chocolate surprise: A comparison shows the use of artificial Yellow 6 in Creme Eggs sold in the U.S., whereas in Britain paprika extract is used

The North Carolina-based bloggers routinely shares posts like this with her 283,000 followers.

While calling out the differences, she slammed the food companies involved for ‘poisoning consumers for profit.’

‘Although artificial dyes are common in America, that doesn’t make them safe to eat,’ Vani said.

She explained that in Europe, food companies are required to include warning labels if they use artificial dyes – hence many opt not to use them.

‘That’s one reason the U.K. version is so different, she added.

‘Companies don’t want to slap warnings all over food packages because that wouldn’t be good for business. To make matters worse, they add high fructose corn syrup, cellulose gum, and artificial preservatives to the U.S. version.

Complicated: In America, Heinz' classic tomato ketchup appears to have more convoluted ingredients compared to its British counterpart, rightComplicated: In America, Heinz' classic tomato ketchup appears to have more convoluted ingredients compared to its British counterpart, right
Complicated: In America, Heinz’ classic tomato ketchup appears to have more convoluted ingredients compared to its British counterpart, right

She believes that U.S. companies continue to sell the artificial ingredient-laden products because they’re ‘cheaper to produce’ and ‘they can get away with it’.

Campaigner: Vani Hari, pictured, routinely calls out food companies for questionable ingredients

For example, she calls out the way Red 40 is used in the production of Doritos in America.

Red 40 is a ‘certified color that comes from petroleum distillates or coal tars’ and The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandates that it has to be listed by name on food and product labels.

Healthline writes that according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Red 40 and other AFCs can cause allergic reactions in some people.

Research shows they can also cause hyperactivity in children and immune system tumors in mice.

Red 40 also contains p-Cresidine, which the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says is ‘reasonably anticipated’ to be a human carcinogen (cancer forming).

Vani reveals that the controversial dye is also included in Quaker Strawberries and Cream oatmeal – while in the U.K., they include ‘freeze dried’ pieces of actual fruit.

Culpit: Red 40 once again appears on the label of Quaker's Strawberries & Cream Instant Oatmeal when it is manufactured Stateside, leftCulpit: Red 40 once again appears on the label of Quaker's Strawberries & Cream Instant Oatmeal when it is manufactured Stateside, left

Culpit: Red 40 once again appears on the label of Quaker’s Strawberries & Cream Instant Oatmeal when it is manufactured Stateside, left

In the U.K., Mountain Dew energy drink gets its bright yellow color from beta carotene (a natural color derived from carrots and other orange/yellow foods) but in the U.S., where the drink is manufactured by PepsiCo, it’s a different story.

Vani writes that it’s color comes from Yellow 5, aka a petroleum-based dye called Tartrazine. Much has been written about Tartrazine since the 1990s, when it was rumored to affect reproduction in males.

However, to this day, most studies on Tartrazine have been carried out on rats but it is acknowledged, in general, that children who consume large doses of artificial food colorings have been affected ‘negatively’ compared to those who received less.

Tartrazine: While Mountain Dew sold to British soda lovers contains coloring derived from beta carotene, Yellow 5 aka Tartrazine is used by Pepsi Co in the U.S., leftTartrazine: While Mountain Dew sold to British soda lovers contains coloring derived from beta carotene, Yellow 5 aka Tartrazine is used by Pepsi Co in the U.S., left

Tartrazine: While Mountain Dew sold to British soda lovers contains coloring derived from beta carotene, Yellow 5 aka Tartrazine is used by Pepsi Co in the U.S., left

Color: Sunny D manufacturers also utilize Yellow 5 aka Tartrazine in the U.S., whereas they do not in the U.K., leftColor: Sunny D manufacturers also utilize Yellow 5 aka Tartrazine in the U.S., whereas they do not in the U.K., left

Color: Sunny D manufacturers also utilize Yellow 5 aka Tartrazine in the U.S., whereas they do not in the U.K., left

In 2015, former management consultant and mom-of-one Vani was called a ‘food terrorist’ by Dr Steven Novella, a clinical neurologist and assistant professor at Yale University’s school of medicine.

‘It’s almost like she’s a food terrorist,’ he said. ‘She will target some benign ingredient that has a scary sounding name. Her criteria is if she can’t pronounce it then it’s scary.’

‘What she does over and over again is target a chemical and try to provoke a disgust reflex by talking about what other purposes a chemical is used for or where it’s derived from,’ Dr Stephen said.

Spot the difference: Vani also calls out the differences between the same products when sold in the U.S., left, and AustraliaSpot the difference: Vani also calls out the differences between the same products when sold in the U.S., left, and Australia

Spot the difference: Vani also calls out the differences between the same products when sold in the U.S., left, and Australia

However, her methods have often worked – at least in creating publicity.

Earlier this month, the cereal company Kelloggs responded to Vani after a petition for them to stop adding the preservative BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) and artificial food dyes to their children’s cereals.

While Kelloggs said they ‘won’t sacrifice the great taste and quality’ by removing the ingredients, Vani was pleased that they had taken note of the criticism.

Campaign: Vani took on Kelloggs, asking for years that they remove BHT and artificial food dyes like Red 40 included in their U.S. products but not in other countries like Canada, rightCampaign: Vani took on Kelloggs, asking for years that they remove BHT and artificial food dyes like Red 40 included in their U.S. products but not in other countries like Canada, right

Controversial: The Food Babe, aka Vani, pictured, has come under fire for her campaigns due to her lack of professional training in nutrition or science

After another relentless social media campaign, Subway removed azodicarbonamide, a chemical in its bread also found in yoga mats. (Though, Dr Stephen said it’s also found in plenty of other bread products, and is well-studied and safe; he believes it’s just easier, to some companies, to make questioned ingredients disappear.)

Vani’s blog rallying against ‘toxic’ levels of sugar and caramel coloring in Starbucks’ Pumpkin Spice Latte ended up in a widely-publicized take down, when Yvette d’Entremont decided to put her in her place.

Setting up a blog SciBabe, analytical chemist Yvette penned a post titled ‘The ‘Food Babe’ Blogger is Full of S**t’.

‘She took caramel color level IV and said that it was in (the government’s) carcinogen class 2B. It sounds horrible, but there’s another thing in the cup that is carcinogen class 2B: the coffee, because of the acrylomide from the roasting process,’ Yvette wrote in the widely-circulated piece that was also published on Gawker.

‘Between her egregious abuse of the word ‘toxin’ anytime there’s a chemical she can’t pronounce and asserting that everyone who disagrees with her is a paid shill, it’s hard to pinpoint her biggest sin.

‘As for sugar in the latte, the average adult would need to down 40 to 50 of them in a sitting to have a toxic dose. And at that point you would also have a toxic dose of water and caffeine.’

  • voza0db

    This article reflects the total dementia of BOTH americans and brits!

    I did not see a single FOOD item in this article!

    So… None of those “fake food” and “fake drink” items are needed for uman animal survival! In fact eating that crap can only cause unbalance of the organism that, with luck, could end in death!

    Unfortunately our current “health” sub-system creates INCENTIVES for moderns uman animals to be totally irresponsible in relation to what they eat and drink… so no luck with the “death” part, which causes a huge unsustainable society.

  • So much garbage marketed as ‘food’. And you know what throws me? When you compare prices of products, many times the least healthy options cost more than the healthier options. Whaaat??? Best not to buy processed ‘food’ at all.

    When possible, shop at a farmer’s market/CSA for real food or even better, grow your own.

  • voza0db

    I don’t know, and never will, what that thing called “doritos” tastes like!

    Unfortunately our sub-systems “capitalism” and “health care” are perfect to create these strange behaviors. I don’t see any type of CHANGE happening in Umans that can end this reality.

    About the last part… the “grow your own”, that requires what many can’t have, a piece of land!
    But for those lucky ones that do have Land, if they don’t do that, then they are even crazier than those eating garbage!

  • Henry George posited that land should not be owned by anyone as people cannot create it – the same goes for air and water; only those things that we create can we own.

    Having land does allow you to grow more diverse crops and in greater volumes but you can grow a number of veggies inside with some inexpensive lighting augmentation.

    I agree that having land and not producing food from it doesn’t make good sense.

  • mwildfire

    I disagree with a lot of what you say, but this–as a person who has lived in rural WV for 40 years and seen my friends and neighbors stop gardening–yeah, seems crazy to me.

  • mwildfire

    We do need some kind of arrangements to decide which humans get to use what land. But the system we have now in the US and most of the world, where ownership of land is contingent on spending thousands of dollars, and once bought, the ownership of the land means a relationship with the land such as God can be presumed to have–one is free to do anything to that land, often including things that harm the air or water downstream, and certainly things that harm the next person downstream in time who owns that land. But there is an exception to these absolute rights–I live over the Marcellus shale play, where the drillers have the right to do as they please on anyone’s land unless they also own the “mineral rights”, and where if a pipeline company decides they want to run across your land, FERC will give them eminent domain rights to seize whatever piece of it they want.

  • mwildfire

    Gotta say this. For someone worried about toxic additives, she sure slathers a lot of questionable stuff on her face. Doesn’t she know toxins can be absorbed through skin? Perhaps her makeup brands are claimed to be non-toxic, but I’d stay the hell away from all that dubious gunk.

  • mwildfire

    One more–the disingenuous person quoted at the end. Yeah, you’d need a tremendous amount of sugar to have a “toxic dose,” but the point is that large quantities of sugar in the daily diet cause lots of lethal conditions. It isn’t about a single dose. If Voza breaks his/her vow and eats a bag of Doritos, once, to find out what they taste like, s/he will no doubt come through fine. It’s not single doses of any of this stuff that cause harm.

  • Yes, the rules regarding land use are abominable. One more thing to add to the long list of issues that need revolutionary redress.
    I’m sorry to hear about the exceptional problems people in your area face.

  • voza0db

    Hello mwildfire.

    You are, still, disagreeing with a lot of what I say because you don’t want to face Reality like she is or just because I’m a very weak writer and can’t express myself properly!

    But on that, stop gardening, we sure see reality in the same way… Just plane full on crazy behavior.

  • DeOccupy

    The original “red necks” who fought the coal company owners and their sold old governments and police forces would probably find this one of the few places to cover the issues with out the bias of the “mainstream” news.