Warren Solidly Responds To Obama With The Facts On Trade

| Educate!

Warren Overwhelms Obama’s Personal Attacks With Devastating Fact-Based Report on the Failure of Trade to Protect Workers

Note: President Obama has repeatedly attacked opponents of his job killing trade agreements, even comparing Sen. Elizabeth Warren to Sarah Palin. We recently wrote:

President Obama has repeatedly chided members of Congress for being inaccurate about what is in the TPP, even comparing Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) to Sarah Palin talking about death panels.  He makes the claim that Congress does not know what it is talking about while keeping the agreement secret and difficult for elected officials and their staff to read. On top of that Obama and his administration consistently put out false and misleading statements about the agreement.  One wonders, and I hope the media begins to ask him, whether President Obama has read the agreement? As Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) said in response: “We know exactly what we’re talking about. My concern is that he does not understand what’s in it.”

The president has claimed that his deals are the most progressive trade agreements ever and fix the problems of NAFTA “by making labor and environmental provisions actually enforceable.” Yet, a leak of the environmental chapter actually shows the opposite – there is no environmental enforcement and the protections are weaker than agreements during the George W. Bush era.

Warren has not backed down. Indeed, she has responded to the president’s outlandish rhetoric with the facts. She took that to a new level with the report “Broken Promises” where her staff provided a fact-based response to the central claim Obama makes: these are the most progressive trade agreements which for the first time have enforceable labor and environmental standards. Below is the executive summary and conclusion of the report.

Broken Promises: Decades of Failure to Enforce Labor Standards in Free Trade Agreements

The Senate will soon vote on the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 – also known as “Fast Track.” President Obama has requested Fast Track authority from Congress to ease the passage of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a massive trade agreement with 12 countries that account for nearly 40% of the global economy. President Obama has repeatedly stated that the TPP is “the most progressive trade bill in history” because it has high labor, environmental, and human rights standards. The President claims the TPP will have “higher labor standards, higher environmental standards,” and “new tools to hold countries accountable.”

But proponents of almost every free trade agreement (FTA) in the last 20 years have made virtually identical claims:

• In 1993, President Clinton claimed that “the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA] is the first agreement that ever really got any teeth in environmental standards, any teeth in what another country had to do with its own workers and its own labor standards… There’s never been anything like this before.”

• In 2005, U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman claimed, “[t]he [Central American Free Trade Agreement] has the strongest labor and environmental provisions of any trade agreement ever negotiated by the United States.

• In 2007, U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab claimed that the Peru, Colombia, and Panama trade agreements contained “unprecedented protections for labor rights and environmental standards.”

• In 2010, President Obama said that the South Korea agreement included “groundbreaking protections for workers’ rights.”

• In 2011, the White House insisted that the Colombia trade agreement “include[d] strong protections for workers’ rights, based on the May 10, 2007, bipartisan CongressionalExecutive agreement to incorporate high labor standards into America’s trade agreements.” President Obama said in 2012 that “this agreement is a win for our workers and the environment because of the strong protections it has for both – commitments we are going to fulfill.”

• A few months later, the White House made nearly identical claims about the Panama Free Trade Agreements.

However, the history of these agreements betrays a harsh truth: that the actual enforcement of labor provisions of past U.S. FTAs lags far behind the promises. This analysis by the staff of Sen. Warren reveals that despite decades of nearly identical promises, the United States repeatedly fails to enforce or adopts unenforceable labor standards in free trade agreements.

Again and again, proponents of free trade agreements claim that this time, a new trade agreement has strong and meaningful protections; again and again, those protections prove unable to stop the worst abuses. Lack of enforcement by both Democratic and Republican presidents and other flaws with the treaties have allowed countries with weaker laws and standards and widespread labor and environment abuses to undermine treaty provisions, leaving U.S. workers and other interested parties with no recourse. This analysis finds:

• The United States does not enforce the labor protections in its trade agreements. A series of reports by the non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO), as well as reports by the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Department of State, document significant and persistent problems with labor abuses in countries with which we have FTAs. While GAO acknowledged progress by partners in implementing commitments and by agencies in tracking progress and engaging on problems, their analysis concluded that the USTR and DOL “do not systemically monitor and enforce compliance with FTA labor provisions,” and that the U.S. agencies generally have not been “identifying compliance problems, developing and implementing responses, and taking enforcement actions.”

• The U.S. pursues very few enforcement actions. Prior to 2008, the Department of Labor had not accepted a single formal complaint about labor abuses in free trade agreements. Since then, the Obama administration has conducted in-depth investigations into complaints and issued fact-finding reports and recommendations. However, DOL has accepted only five claims against countries for violating their labor commitments, and it only agreed to restart the first ever labor enforcement case under any free trade agreement in 2014, six years after the initial claim was filed. This reveals both the cumbersome nature of complaint process and the overall enforcement problems with these agreements.

• Widespread labor-related human rights violations. The United States has 14 free trade agreements with 20 countries. While some of these countries have made progress in improving labor conditions, problems with labor rights and other abuses are widespread. U.S. agencies or other investigators have identified significant problems with use of child labor or other labor-related human rights abuses in 11 of the 20 countries.

• Failure to curb even the worst abuses. Case studies of several countries that have signed U.S. free trade agreements reveal continuing horrific labor abuses. Guatemala was named “the most dangerous country in the world for trade unionists” five years after entering a trade agreement with the U.S. In Colombia, despite the existence of a special “Labor Action Plan” put in place to address long-standing problems and secure passage of the Colombia FTA, 105 union activists have been murdered and 1,337 death threats have been issued since the Labor Action Plan was finalized four years ago.


The TPP is being hailed as the strongest free trade agreement yet. But this is not the first time this claim has been made. Proponents of previous trade agreements have made similar claims about every free trade agreement signed in the last 20 years, from the NAFTA agreement in 1993 to the more recent agreements with Colombia and Panama.

By now, we have two decades of experience with free trade agreements under both Democratic and Republican Presidents. Supporters of these agreements have always promised that they contain tough standards to protect workers.

But this analysis reveals that the rhetoric has not matched the reality. There have been widespread enforcement problems and flaws that prevent enforcement of the labor provisions of these free trade agreements. GAO concluded that USTR and DOL “do not systemically monitor and enforce compliance with FTA labor provisions,”67 and that the U.S. agencies generally have not been “identifying compliance problems, developing and implementing responses, and taking enforcement actions.”68 Reports by the State Department and the Department of Labor reveal persistent problems with child labor and labor rights in countries that have signed free trade agreements with the United States

And case studies of several countries that have signed U.S. free trade agreements reveal continuing horrific labor abuses: Guatemala was named ‘the most dangerous country in the world for trade unionists” five years after entering a trade agreement with the U.S.; in Colombia, despite the existence of a special Labor Action Plan put in place to address long-standing problems, 105 union activists have been murdered and 1,337 death threats have been issued since the U.S. Free Trade Agreement was finalized.


  • Pingback: Obama Wrong Again: Trade Law Undermines Food Safety Law | PopularResistance.Org()

  • occupyRUScom

    The Evil “T.P.P.+” Proponents (Persons/Corporations/Gov’t) Tried (trying) to SECEDE from the “WTO” Union (PACT) obligations in order to ENRICH SELVES; Exclusively via SECRET … is a CHEAP TRICK by Greedy Entities GOING NOWHERE Except into Self-Defeat and Shame!

    Welcome To [OUR] ‘Space-Ship-Earth+!’ And REALiTY is in Front of ye Noses.

  • mwildfire

    The aggression Obama shows in fighting back against Warren was nowhere evident in defending healthcare reform, or environmental protection, or jobs bills.

  • easywriter

    We are like Charlie Brown believing Lucy, that she really will hold the football this time.

  • fjwhite

    In the context of this discussion, Canadian professor Michael Welton makes a pertinent observation —

    ““Left progressive intellectuals and activists know that the US has turned away from acting justly in the world….Now might be the time for us—at least for a little while—to reflect deeply on how it has come to be that the ruling elites can take the world in a direction that is so obviously detrimental to most of us who live in it. We need to ponder the mounting evidence, despite our best intentions, that our attempts in the Academy and in public spaces to foster a culture of critical discourse have not penetrated very deeply. How could it have— if our world leaders can so easily drape a blanket of untruth over their statements and get away with it?”

    Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/20/the-propagandists-of-empire/

  • Jon

    What “we”? Are you deluded? I’m not!