Women’s March On Pentagon To Confront Bipartisan War Machine?

| Organize!

Above Photo:  astoller/ Flickr

Women’s March on the Pentagon? An Interview with Cindy Sheehan

Since the Dems took control of the House in 2007, the antiwar movement has been pitiful.”

AG: Cindy Sheehan, I understand that you’ve started organizing a Women’s March on the Pentagon. Why?

CS: Yes, Ann, thank you. I’m beginning to organize a Women’s March on the Pentagon because since 2007, when Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats regained a majority in the House of Representatives, there has been an incomprehensible absence of protesting the USA’s wars and empire. After Obama took over as president, the antiwar movement all but died. Now we have these huge Women’s Marches, climate marches, and so forth, but many of us think that one cannot separate the global emancipation of women, or the destruction of our planet from the issue of war. I feel that instead of beating our heads against a wall to call on these liberal marches to address the issue, we should do what we can to do so ourselves.

AG: Have you set a date yet?

CS: We haven’t set a date yet, but there are some significant dates coming up. October 7 will be the anniversary of the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and the Afghanistan War is now the longest running war in U.S. history.

Also, October 21 will be the 51st anniversary of the March on the Pentagon to Confront the War Makers organized by the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam .

AG: And what will you do if Rachel Maddow and the rest of the corporate media start shrieking that only Kremlin tools would organize a March on the Pentagon?

“The Women’s March on the Pentagon will not be a Get-Out-the-Vote Rally for the Democrat half of the war party.”

CS: Well, considering that Rachel Maddow and the rest of the corporate media are tools of the Pentagon, I wouldn’t be surprised if they did start shrieking about “Kremlin tools” organizing a march on the Pentagon. Of course these days everything’s Russia’s fault, and I’m sure that the midterm elections in November of this year will create a lot of liberal push back against this march on the Pentagon. Unlike the previous Climate Marches and Women’s Marches, the Women’s March on the Pentagon will not be a Get-Out-the-Vote Rally for the Democrat half of the war party. But we really need to highlight that war and peace is not a liberal or conservative issue; it’s a survival issue. And of course we have to be ready for the slings and arrows of people like Rachel Maddow and the corporate media because that’s the way it always is, but the more attention we get for our cause the better.

AG: In the current environment, with Twitter, Facebook, and the Youtube all submitting to governmental pressure to curtail dissent and promote Russophobia, do you have a backup social media plan?

CS: Since we are just starting to organize it, I think people should keep on checking Facebook for the Women’s March on the Pentagon. Of course Cindy Sheehan’s Soapbox will have information. We’ll probably put a website together. But to circumvent this Twitter, Facebook, Youtube collaboration with the federal government, we have to go back to organizing the old-fashioned way, including e-mail. And when I call e-mail old-fashioned, that shows how far we’ve come, but over 100,000 people got to the March on the Pentagon to Confront the War Makers in 1967, and more than 500,000 people got to the Vietnam Moratorium March on Washington in 1969 without social media. The organizers used face-to-face contact. They handed out flyers, went to events and called friends and family to promote it.

And we will use social media. There are some new ones coming out that are thus far more free of government censorship.

“To circumvent the Twitter, Facebook, Youtube collaboration with the federal government, we have to go back to organizing the old-fashioned way, including e-mail.”

AG: Will you be suggesting that marchers wear their pink pussy hats or do you have another insignia in mind?

CS: Ha! I think people should wear whatever color, or kind of hat they like. I prefer my hats to be more the style of Commandante Fidel or Ché, myself. Seriously though, I was told by one of the people close to the Women’s March that the issue of war would NEVER be addressed as long as women aren’t free. She was of course talking about only white American women, apparently, because the war at home and the wars abroad kill or oppress thousands of women and their families every year. No woman can be “free” if any woman is oppressed by the US Empire, anywhere in the world. True solidarity means solidarity with ALL women.

The pink pussy hat is also a symbol of anti-Trump sentiment. I think most of us agree that it’s proper to be anti-Trump, but the Women’s March on the Pentagon will recognize that the issue of war and peace is, unfortunately, non-partisan.

AG: I’ve heard rumblings about a Men’s Counter March with big dick hats to support the Pentagon. Will you be conducting nonviolent resistance training to prepare for that?

CS: Yes. Ever since my son Casey was killed in Iraq on April 04, 2004, there have been counter protests at our antiwar events, and even though no one wore a “big dick hat,” they may as well have. Isn’t war the ultimate expression of “my dick is bigger than yours?”

“The war at home and the wars abroad kill or oppress thousands of women and their families every year.”

AG: Today there are reports that a total of 4.2 million people may have attended the Women’s Marches in 60 different cities last Saturday. Most of their focus has been on electoral politics, pro Democrat and anti-Trump. Big donors have given hundreds of millions of dollars to support the march and the staffing and operations of various participating organizations since Trump was elected. A march that challenges the war machine couldn’t hope to raise a fraction of that much funding, so what would you consider a success?

CS: Like I said above, since the Dems took control of the House in 2007, the antiwar movement has been pitiful.The numbers have dwindled from millions on the eve of the destruction of Iraq in 2003, to dozens, or hundreds now (if we are lucky). I have stopped measuring success by numbers. So, the Women’s March turned out 4.5 million people? What systemic change will occur? We know that NO systemic change will occur as a consequence of re-electing Democratic Party majorities.

I would love to see 5000 people at a Women’s March on the Pentagon, but who knows? Success for me would also be a cross-section of demographics in attendance. The one thing we can never forget is, “Trump’s finger is on the nuclear trigger.”


    As a conscientious objector to war since 1967, I support Cindy Sheehan and what she is trying to do. But, after many millions of us were ignored by Bush & Cheney in 2002 and 2003, what “systemic change” could possibly be started by such a march on the Pentagon in 2018? The War Machine is an integral part of the U.S. economy, which is, as Seymour Melman called it, the Permanent War Economy. Endless war is endlessly profitable. As long as war is so profitable (War is A Racket), and most members of Congress and the media serve the war economy, much more than marches will be necessary to stop this War Machine. Short of a General Strike, I don’t know what we can do.

  • kevinzeese

    Good points. I don’t think Cindy or anyone involved with her would argue that a women’s march will successfully end the war machine. However, every action can lead to more actions. Where do women’s peace march organizers go after that march? What are they next steps? We have no idea at this point. There a wide range of actions that could be taken to keep building the movement after a women’s peace march. Such a march may lead to various forms of economic protests, e.g. boycotts or strikes which could build to a general strike. We can’t start with a general strike, but a movement has to grow and take smaller steps to become capable of accomplishing such a powerful action.

  • Peter Baldwin

    I think you are underestimating the people’s ability to connect the dots. The war machine is central to climate, racism, inequality, industrialization, capitalism, environment, and misogyny. I’ll come and bring a big drum. Who knows, maybe the walls of Jericho will come tumbling down!

  • Schoolteacher

    I am in. I have been fed up with the war machine for decades. My brother in law died in Vietnam for a lie in 1967. I will come in his name! War is a great Evil that organizes our economy and that creates poverty here at home. It’s the reason we don’t have so many nice things! It’s the Evil Elephant in our livingroom!

  • rgaura

    I still remember the commitment, the creativity, and the exhilaration of shutting down SF with 300,000 other marchers against the Iraq invasion. Wow! It gives you faith in people! Still, the organisers should acquaint themselves with the development and deployment of crowd control weapons being used these days against `civil disruption´. Suzie Dawson did a great interview recently, and has written about these weapons. Wikileaks has revealed much about who is producing and selling them, its all going into place under the radar. We need to educate about these weapons, and produce laws to limit or ban their use, as well as protect our friends.

  • mwildfire

    I’m pretty much with redpilled–I stopped going to antiwar marches in 2004 or so, not because of Democrats anywhere but because I saw it was futile. I see no evidence that it has any effect. I don’t think the huge antiwar marches stopped the Vietnam war, either–it was when the officers couldn’t turn their backs on their own men, the fragging, that They gave up on that War. And those men were draftees, who had never agreed to join the military but were forced in on threat of imprisonment. The military learned their lesson and went to the volunteer army (the poverty draft). And I’m tired of defining success as “raising awareness” and such–I want wars and pipelines stopped, the military budget slashed, honest addressing of the many crises of our time.
    On the other hand, I agree with Kevin that a general strike IS a key, perhaps uniquely powerful tactic–and therefore it shouldn’t be wasted, the chance blown, by being pulled out too early. It will only be effective if a large minority of the public joins in, and that will only happen with quite a lot of awareness raising. Perhaps a march is a way to do that–I’m not sure. Might be more effective to do it in every state capital, with a focus on “what we could be spending these huge sums on instead of killing people and fomenting terrorism.” It feels to me like the current plans may not have any clear objective, just a sense that “there ought to be a march.”

  • jemcgloin

    The protests at home encouraged the protests by the soldiers that ended the war.

  • Jon

    Bingo! The best people to get to the consciousness of the existing military forces are veterans. i hope Veterans for Peace and Courage to Resist will make their primary focus alerting not only existing military people, but police and other “security forces” about the real threats internally to “national security.” And by that term I do not mean preservation of the Washington Regime, but those of us who believe in the validity of the Bill of Rights and other Constitutional guarantees about our liberties. Thank you Cindy for this initiative, regardless of outcome. It will have unknown reverberations.

  • Jed Grover

    These military orders come from the CFR and other war mongering neocon Zionist think tanks. Shift some focus on these illustrious deviant shadow organizations.