Skip to content

September 2011

Transnational Peoples Movements Form to Respond to Transnational Injustice

By Matthew Cappiello and Kevin Zeese
Truthout, September30, 2011

An anti-government protester defaces a picture of Hosni Mubarak. (Photo: Antonello Mangano / Flickr)

In an era where multinational corporations and linked international security networks exert increasing control over our daily lives, we have to fight their attempts to profit off our divided and balkanized communities by establishing independent connections with one another. Even though the United States has caused many horrible things around the world, there is still a powerful movement of people in this country that will stand up for justice for the world's underserved populations when needed.

The Kool-Aid of the propagandistic corporate media, political duopoly partisans and Islamophobes want to divide people of the world in order to divide and rule because unity makes people stronger and harder to control.

Transnational citizen's movements are developing to respond to transnational political and economic elites. Some of the most famous American voices for peace and justice have signed a solidarity statement with top Egyptian activists, in order to affirm common goals and principles required to bring real change on both sides of the globe. Noted American activists such as Noam Chomsky and noted Egyptian activists such as Asmaa Mahfouz and Ahmed Maher have signed in support for one another's common transnational goals.Their statement is coupled with a vow to stand in solidarity with the October2011 Movement, beginning on October 6 (in Washington, DC's, Freedom Plaza) and October 7 (in Egypt's Tahrir Square), and we have found the ultimate antidote to anti-Americanism - mutual empathy for one another's common grievances.

US-based signatories to the statement such as Chomsky and Chris Hedges remain well aware that wealth disparities, health disparities and military-industrial handouts have destroyed our nation and turned democracy into a charade. And so do Egypt-based signatories such as Ahmed Maher and Waleed Rashed from the April 6 Movement and Asmaa Mahfouz from the January YouTube video that brought thousands to the streets, as they see parallels between American struggles and their own struggles against oppression.

Does anyone really think that the crony capitalism of the barons of Wall Street is so much different than the entrenched cronyism of the Egyptian military leadership, many of whom only switched sides from Mubarak to the revolution once they knew the ship was going to sink? Despite the comparative numbers of dollars spent, does anyone think that US financial support of boondoggle Egyptian military contractors differs substantially from US financial support of boondoggle Iraqi contractors? Does anyone really think that the struggles for health care and labor justice in this country differ in principle from the struggles of Egyptian doctors and teachers fighting for a living wage and decent infrastructure?

Transnational citizen movements have become easier thanks to technology. The Internet really can connect common people on both sides of the globe and allow us to see shared truths hidden by corporate and state media. We are learning that major social media networks such as Twitter still shill out to Wall Street every once in a while. Not only has October2011 joined with the Egyptians, but the movement has joined with the Indignados of Spain on our common Road to Dignity. From the beginning, the October2011 Movement has called out to the world, their mutual support recognizing "that only together can we achieve our shared goals."

Moreover, small protests localized to merely one country or region won't cut it for issues nowadays that are exacerbated by pernicious special interests on both sides of the world or that affect the entire planet, like climate change. We need the truest possible expressions of international solidarity. We need large and simultaneous protests against common problems on both sides of the globe - or at least one large protest on one side of the globe, coupled with skilled advocates on the other side that can identify the right policymakers or venues within which to redress the relevant grievances.

For instance, if we want to reallocate larger portions of US foreign aid to Egypt's military to grassroots civil society organizations instead, we must remember that both status quo Egyptian stalwarts and finely greased United States lobbyists will campaign hard against any changes. We've seen this in America every year, when defense lobbyists strangle our ability to decrease our own defense budget. A similar story bears true for civil society aid itself. On the United States side, 85 percent of United States Agency for International Development handouts> since January 25 have been funneled to US-based organizations rather than to Egyptians themselves;, while on the Egyptian side, corruption and poor management have prevented many beneficial effects of foreign aid from actually reaching the people. Effective transnational collaboration among activists is essential if we wish to entertain any hope of change.

Make no mistake, though - we must still entertain this hope. Real participatory democracy is needed in both Egypt and the United States as well as many other countries. Foreign cash flow is rolling into Egypt for vague terms like "democracy promotion" and to November parliamentary elections, often at an uneasily high level relative to current confidence in the integrity of political and electoral infrastructure. Disunity, backdoor manipulation and a significant lack of citizen political education all threaten upcoming constitutional talks, just like it did in post-2003 Iraq. More Americans recognize the mirage of our democracy as the two parties vie for corporate cash, with Obama seeking the first billion dollar campaign, often charging $35,800 to attend one event - more than the median individual income of Americans.

In addition, America's selective and capricious support for Arab Spring movements while at other times supporting brutal Arab dictators, continued building of US military bases in the region, along with the already announced veto of Palestinian statehood, threatens a looming wave of frustration and anti-Americanism, all of which might be manipulated by pundits and corporate media in order to make these movements look like extremists. We need to stand strong against such challenges to reform.

If we want to see Egypt take the next step from revolution to authentic democracy, we need to build an international solidarity movement for political and economic change in the region which rivals the South African anti-apartheid movement or the post-war rebuilding of Germany and Japan in terms of its optimism and resolve. We need to take back the narrative of current history from the pundits who say, "Failure of revolutions is inevitable," or, "Middle Eastern countries will inevitably devolve into ethnic infighting," or even that "models of democracy are incompatible with Muslim-majority societies." This type of cynicism is a cancer; and they are false.

In fact, these cynical talking points only serve the rhetorical interests of the elites in the Arab Spring nations, who caused many of these problems in the first place, along with opportunistic American political and financial elites, who are more concerned with hoarding wealth and power rather than justice. They avoid a larger discussion about the real issues of importance - namely, the socioeconomic inequalities and societal injustices which brought members of both the Arab Spring movements and the October2011 Movement to the streets. More well-established transnational partnerships between our activist movements will shatter the myth that both sides of the globe have to remain ideologically suspicious of one another's intentions, and will draw more attention to our common problems that elites on both sides of the globe want us to avoid.

As many are repeating across the blogosphere, Egypt's upcoming electoral and constitutional efforts will serve as an indicator of the viability of the Arab Spring protests to generate pragmatic change. The United States has a poor history with reform movements in the Middle East, but the country is not monolithic. Some of us actually take the idea of America seriously - stated simply by the October2011.org movement as a society which supports "human needs, not corporate greed." If we wish to move forward in a manner that transcends rather than repeats history, we must realize that, together, we are far larger than the sum of our parts.

Kevin Zeese is co-director of It's Our Economy and co-chair of Come Home America. He serves on the steering committee of the Bradley Manning Support Network and is a core organizer of October2011.org

Matthew Cappiello is a student and board member of Muslims for Peace, Justice, and Progress.

 

Occupy Wall Street: 100’s of 1000’s join, Sen. Sanders says ‘desperately needed’

Americans have awakened: Hundreds of thousands join Occupy Wall Street to stop it 'drowning our children in national debt' by ending wars of aggression

Thursday, as hundreds of thousands of Americans joined Occupy Wall Street in the struggle for basic human rights, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont proved he is the strongest congressional advocate of the people's occupation movement after Current TV's Keith Olbermann proved he is the strongest high-profile mainstream media figure to cover the revolutionary event media is blacking out. Members of up to five powerful unions, rights defenders in dozens of cities, plus Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Roseanne Barr, Dr. Cornell West and other celebrities have joined the protesters who intend to occupy the Wall Street area indefinitely, until change occurs in the financial situation that Olbermann and Sanders concur is being demanded by an overdue, active, motivated, American Left coalition forming for betterment of the United States.

"The middle class is collapsing in America today, poverty is increasing, and institutions like Wall Street have enormous power of our economy and political life," Senator Sanders told Current TV's Keith Olbermann, former MSNBC anchor. 

(Watch embedded Youtube video on this page left of Olbermann's Occupy Wall Street news, Sept. 29, 2011)

Thursday, with 440 days until the presidential election, Olbermann in New York, highlighted that tens of thousands of people have now joined the Occupy Wall Street movement with up to five powerful unions joining: the Airline Pilots Association, the Transit Workers Union, the United Federation of  Teachers, the SEIU and possibly the auto workers. 

Olbermann said that "the First Transit Workers Union 100 alone includes as many as 38,000 people."

Endorsing Occupy Wall Street to end corporate greed over human need, Senator Sanders told Olbermann, "We desperately need a coming together of working people to stand up to Wall St, cooperate America and say enough is enough. We need to rebuild the middle calls in this country and you guys can't have it all," said  Sen. Sanders, the longest serving independent in U.S. Congressional history.

"What I appreciate that's happening in New York city today is there's a spotlight being focused on Wall Street. We desperately need that," Senator Sanders told Olbermann Thursday.

"If we're going to get out of this recession, if we're going to create the millions of jobs that we desperately need, we need real Wall Street reform," Senator Sanders asserted.

Senator Sanders caucuses with and is counted as a Democrat Party member for committee assignments, but since he belongs to no formal political party, he appears as an independent on the ballot. He was the sole  independent member of the House much of his service there.

Senator Sanders said Thursday, "Right now, and a lot of people don't know this, you have six financial institutions, the largest six banks in the country, who control sixty percent of the assets of the United States of America. After we bail them out, because they were too big to fail, three out of the four largest financial institutions actually became bigger."

"So, if we're going to create a situation where capital is going to flow into the productive economy, into manufacturing, into building our infrastructure, into transforming our energy system, we need a lot of pressure on Wall Street. No doubt about that."

"Focusing attention on Wall Street is absolutely the right thing to do."

In leading the call for media reform, Senator Sanders opposes increased concentration of ownership of media outlets.

Senator Sanders described himself as a democratic socialist and has praised European social democracy.

Not just left-wing

The rapidly spreading people's occupation of cities across the nation, in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street, is practicing participatory democracy with People's Congresses for decision making. 

Occupy Chicago is live-streaming as is Occupy Wall Street in New York. 

Thursday, Occupy Wall Street Lexington Kentucky protesters shouted the chant, "Occupy Wall Street! This is what democracy looks like!" (Watch "Occupy JPMorgan Chase Lexington, Kentucky #occupywallstreet, #occupylexky," uploaded by HillbillyReport.)

Forbes reported Friday, "Joining with nearly 100 actions in cities from Los Angeles to Dallas, Chicago,and Washington D.C., concerned citizens have come to speak out for greater economic equality." 

Twittering "Occupy Wall Street" (#occupywallstreet) brings a flurry of Tweets from well over 100 cities organizing occupations.

Among some of the cities to join the people's movement are Occupy Los Angeles and Occupy New Orleans (Occupy NOLA) that begin events Saturday. Three movements in Texas alone are beginning occupations in Austin, Houston and San Antonio according to Tweets on Thursday.

Also according to Tweets, occupations of media moguls are being planned, including Occupy CNN "to bring Occupy Wall Street to media's doorstep." That effort that might be thwarted since CNN  reported on Occupy Wall Street Friday morning.

"Protests to draw attention to the power of Wall Street firms in the United States and world economies will continue for a 14th straight day Friday in New York City," CNN reported, complete with a photograph of protesters holding handmade signs, one about poverty and the other saying, "Wall Street has the Real Weapons of Mass Destruction."

"We are gathered here in this place to craft a mission statement, to shape a statement of what it is we want and how we're going to get it," Robert Segal, one of the protesters said as reported by CNN.

Referring to Occupy Boston, Forbes reported, "Planning this event began with a group of over 200 people from all walks of life who assembled on Boston Common Tuesday evening to discuss taking action." 

Occupy Boston, like the other American city occupations is using participatory direct democracy.

"Through the use of direct democracy, Occupy Boston is working to define and solve the problems of: an opaque and exclusive government, a Wall Street without conscience, and a state struggling to guarantee basic human rights."

Forbes reported, "Everyone is invited to join this conversation about reforming how business and government operate."

The peaceful revolution, that uses the hashtag #occupywallstreet on Twitter, had its roots in the 2010 White House Protests where Chris Hedges made his empowering speech calling for peaceful revolution. 

Following those White House protests calling to end the U.S. led wars of aggression in the post 911 era, Vietnam era Veteran Ward Reilly, attorney Kevin Zeese, author of "War Is A Lie," David Swanson and others announced on June 6 that an occupation of Washington D.C. would begin October 6 and last indefinitely.

That occupation, the peoples movement now called October201, aims to "stop the machine" and "create a new world" its leaders state on its website filled with preparation guides for participants and a list of people committed to the D.C. encampment.

October 6 marks the tenth year of the U.S.-led war of aggression on Afghanistan.

Occupy Wall Street began in July by launching of a campaign website calling for a march and a sit-in at the New York Stock Exchange.

During actress and TV producer Roseanne Barr's surprise appearance at Occupy Wall Street the second day of the protest, she called for “a new capitalism.”

“I’m talking about a system that rewards hard work and ambition but cares for it’s weakest child,” she said.
 
Asked whether she felt Wall Street deserved the abuse the protesters heaped on it, Susan Sarandon responded with another question, "Do you think if you asked that question of anyone in America the answer would be 'no'?" she said. "It's not to say that everything is Wall Street's responsibility. There are good corporations. I can't think of any off the top of my head."
 
In his address to the "occupiers," Cornel West told them, "Dissent is what love looks like in public."

Filmmaker, author and humanitarian Michael Moore has been the strongest celebrity advocate of the occupations. (See: "Michael Moore joins Occupy Wall St. rights defenders, Am Revolution Day 11 (vid)," Dupré, D. Examiner, September 27. 2011)

Amid launching his latest book, "Here Comes Trouble," Mr. Moore has supported the occupations in his appearances on several TV programs in recent days.

"These people on Wall Street ripped off the future of many of these young people here and their not-yet-born children," AP reported after Mr. Moore joined the hundreds of protesters at the Wall Street area Zuccotti ark encampment in attempt to stop the media black-out of the event.

"It was the greatest heist, certainly of my lifetime."

"This protest has to start somewhere, and it might as well have started here," Mr. Moore told the occupiers.

Tuesday, Mr. Moore Tweeted, "It is time for every single American to wake up, to see that the billionaires are drowning our children in National Debts." 

Source: Examiner

 

The Best Among Us


AP / Louis Lanzano

Protesters march past Federal Hall on Wall Street on Monday. The Occupy Wall Street protest is in its second week in New York City as demonstrators speak out against corporate greed and social inequality.

By Chris Hedges
Sep 29, 2011


 

There are no excuses left. Either you join the revolt taking place on Wall Street and in the financial districts of other cities across the country or you stand on the wrong side of history. Either you obstruct, in the only form left to us, which is civil disobedience, the plundering by the criminal class on Wall Street and accelerated destruction of the ecosystem that sustains the human species, or become the passive enabler of a monstrous evil. Either you taste, feel and smell the intoxication of freedom and revolt or sink into the miasma of despair and apathy. Either you are a rebel or a slave.

To be declared innocent in a country where the rule of law means nothing, where we have undergone a corporate coup, where the poor and working men and women are reduced to joblessness and hunger, where war, financial speculation and internal surveillance are the only real business of the state, where even habeas corpus no longer exists, where you, as a citizen, are nothing more than a commodity to corporate systems of power, one to be used and discarded, is to be complicit in this radical evil. To stand on the sidelines and say “I am innocent” is to bear the mark of Cain; it is to do nothing to reach out and help the weak, the oppressed and the suffering, to save the planet. To be innocent in times like these is to be a criminal. Ask Tim DeChristopher

Choose. But choose fast. The state and corporate forces are determined to crush this. They are not going to wait for you. They are terrified this will spread. They have their long phalanxes of police on motorcycles, their rows of white paddy wagons, their foot soldiers hunting for you on the streets with pepper spray and orange plastic nets. They have their metal barricades set up on every single street leading into the New York financial district, where the mandarins in Brooks Brothers suits use your money, money they stole from you, to gamble and speculate and gorge themselves while one in four children outside those barricades depend on food stamps to eat. Speculation in the 17th century was a crime. Speculators were hanged. Today they run the state and the financial markets. They disseminate the lies that pollute our airwaves. They know, even better than you, how pervasive the corruption and theft have become, how gamed the system is against you, how corporations have cemented into place a thin oligarchic class and an obsequious cadre of politicians, judges and journalists who live in their little gated Versailles while 6 million Americans are thrown out of their homes, a number soon to rise to 10 million, where a million people a year go bankrupt because they cannot pay their medical bills and 45,000 die from lack of proper care, where real joblessness is spiraling to over 20 percent, where the citizens, including students, spend lives toiling in debt peonage, working dead-end jobs, when they have jobs, a world devoid of hope, a world of masters and serfs.

The only word these corporations know is more. They are disemboweling every last social service program funded by the taxpayers, from education to Social Security, because they want that money themselves. Let the sick die. Let the poor go hungry. Let families be tossed in the street. Let the unemployed rot. Let children in the inner city or rural wastelands learn nothing and live in misery and fear. Let the students finish school with no jobs and no prospects of jobs. Let the prison system, the largest in the industrial world, expand to swallow up all potential dissenters. Let torture continue. Let teachers, police, firefighters, postal employees and social workers join the ranks of the unemployed. Let the roads, bridges, dams, levees, power grids, rail lines, subways, bus services, schools and libraries crumble or close. Let the rising temperatures of the planet, the freak weather patterns, the hurricanes, the droughts, the flooding, the tornadoes, the melting polar ice caps, the poisoned water systems, the polluted air increase until the species dies. 

Who the hell cares? If the stocks of ExxonMobil or the coal industry or Goldman Sachs are high, life is good. Profit. Profit. Profit. That is what they chant behind those metal barricades. They have their fangs deep into your necks. If you do not shake them off very, very soon they will kill you. And they will kill the ecosystem, dooming your children and your children’s children. They are too stupid and too blind to see that they will perish with the rest of us. So either you rise up and supplant them, either you dismantle the corporate state, for a world of sanity, a world where we no longer kneel before the absurd idea that the demands of financial markets should govern human behavior, or we are frog-marched toward self-annihilation. 

 
Those on the streets around Wall Street are the physical embodiment of hope. They know that hope has a cost, that it is not easy or comfortable, that it requires self-sacrifice and discomfort and finally faith. They sleep on concrete every night. Their clothes are soiled. They have eaten more bagels and peanut butter than they ever thought possible. They have tasted fear, been beaten, gone to jail, been blinded by pepper spray, cried, hugged each other, laughed, sung, talked too long in general assemblies, seen their chants drift upward to the office towers above them, wondered if it is worth it, if anyone cares, if they will win. But as long as they remain steadfast they point the way out of the corporate labyrinth. This is what it means to be alive. They are the best among us.
 

Click here to access OCCUPY TOGETHER, a hub for all of the events springing up across the country in solidarity with Occupy Wall St.

 

Nonviolent Peacekeeping

Brothers and Sisters, 
 
Thank you so much for volunteering for this critically important role. 
 
All peacekeepers will be provided with specially designed peacekeeper shirts - a t-shirt and a hooded sweatshirt so please make sure you have given me your shirt size. 
 
The peacekeeper training will be at St. Stephen's Church at 1 PM on Wed. Oct. 5. The address is 1525 Newton St. NW at the corner of 16th and Newton St. Directions how to get there can be found at the church's web site http://www.saintstephensdc.org/directions.html
 
If you haven't yet read this, please take a few moments and do so. 
 
Look forward to seeing everyone soon. 
 
Please feel free to call or e-mail with any further questions
 
Tarak
845 679-3299
845 706-0187 (cell)
 
 

NONVIOLENT PEACEKEEPING TECHNIQUES

PEACEKEEPERS:  WHAT THEY ARE, WHAT THEY DO

[[wysiwyg_imageupload:13:]]

In numerous demonstrations of the past it has been found that the effectiveness and nonviolence of the action has been greatly enhanced by the participation of people with special skills. These specialized participants, or peace-keepers, perform specific facilit-ating roles for the action. Even if you have not decided to specialize in the role of peacekeeper, however, you may find yourself in a conflict situation in which peacekeeper skills will be useful. In a nonviolent action everyone is, to some extent, a peacekeeper. 
         Peacekeepers: help set the tone for the action;  help act as a communication network; help provide emergency medical and legal aid; help maintain the internal self-discipline of the action; may volunteer to act as mediators between authorities and demonstrators. 
         Peacekeepers help to maintain the nonviolent self-discipline of the demonstration. Peacekeepers have primary responsibility to the participants in the action, but they should be prepared to protect legal authorities, workers, and non-participants from demonstrators if necessary.

SOME GUIDELINES TO HELP PEACEKEEPERS DO THEIR JOBS:

1.    Be warm, friendly, and helpful. The tone of the demonstration depends on how you respond to your fellow demonstrators, police, the media, and workers. Our attitude should be one of openness, friendliness and respect toward all officials and participants. Peace-keepers are not junior police, and this is no place for authority trips. 
2.    Be creative. Nonviolence does not mean being aloof or failing to act. You must be creative in your attempt to inter-vene and resolve a conflict. 
3.    Be firm, but not rigid. If you have agreed to be a peacekeeper you must have agreed to uphold the nonviolent principles of the demonstration. 
4.    Be forthright. Deal fairly and honestly with people engaged in conflict, no matter what they have done. 
5.    Be calm. It is a rare person who does not become angry or afraid under stress. Don't think that you are weak if you have fears. The important thing in being a peacekeeper is learning how to control your feelings by remembering the overall goal of the action. 
6.    Be forgiving. Give up resentment over the wrong you are trying to set right. Gandhi said, "Hate sin, and love the sinner." This applies to conflicts between demonstrators as well as to conflicts with police, workers, onlookers 
7.    Work as a team. You don't have to do everything yourself. Use and rely on the support you can get from other peacekeepers and from your fellow demonstrators.

 

AFL-CIO’s Richard Trumka Backs Occupy Wall Street

By David Swanson
War Is a Crime, September30,  2011

Video on C-Span.

Rough transcript:

okay. let's take questions from the audience. in the very back there's a question with his hand up, and if you can give us your name, and if you're with an organization and also keep your questions brief so we can get to as many people as possible.

certainly. lloyd chris, america's democratic action. my question actually has to do with the occupied wall street protests that are going on in new york city, and there's been some recent activity where some union locals are kind of becoming involved in that, and i was wondering if you have an opinion on some of the afl-cio national member organizations, kind of beginning to take a role in that because i sort of think that that street demonstration activity is sort of forcing dialogue on the issues that you're talking about. just wondered if you have any thoughts on that, thank you.

i happen to agree with you. i think being in the streets and calling attention to issues is sometime the only recourse you have because god only knows you can go to the hill, and you can talk to a lot of people and see nothing ever happen because it doesn't happen. in the streets, i think, a lot of people are there. our international unions are involved. our locals are involved, and you'll see a lot of working people. you'll see a lot of small business people. you'll see a lot of manufacturing people who actually produce in this country that are being stepped on the same way by multinationals in wall street. i think it's a tactic and a valid tactic to call attention to a problem. wall street is out of control. we have three imbalances in this country. the imbalance between imports and exports. the imbalance between employer power and working power, and the imbalance between the real economy and the financial economy. we need to bring back balance to the final economy and calling attention to it and peacefully protesting is very legitimate way of doing it. god only knows i've done it thousands of times myself, and i'll do it again.

Source: War is Crime

How Anti-Authoritarians Can Transcend their Sense of Hopelessness and Fight Back

How can anti-authoritarian critical thinkers rise above their pessimism and really fight for change?

 
 
 

Critical thinking anti-authoritarians see the enormity of the military-industrial complex, the energy-industrial complex and the financial-industrial complex. They see the overwhelming power of the U.S. ruling class. They see many Americans unaware of the true sources of their oppression or with little knowledge of the strategies and tactics necessary to overcome it. They see American society lacking the psychological and cultural building blocks necessary for democratic movements—the self-respect required to reject the role as a mere subject of power, the collective self-confidence that success is possible, courage, determination, anti-authoritarianism, and solidarity. They see how the corporatocracy pays back those few Americans who do question, challenge, and resist illegitimate authority with economic and political marginalization.

Critical Thinking, Depression, and Political Passivity

Research shows that a more accurate notion of one’s powerlessness can result in a greater feeling of helplessness and is associated with depression. Several classic studies show that moderately depressed people are more critically thinking than those who are not depressed. Researchers Lauren Alloy and Lyn Abramson, studying nondepressed and depressed subjects who played a rigged game in which they had no actual control, found that nondepressed subjects overestimated their contribution to winning, while depressed subjects more accurately evaluated their lack of control.

If you are critical thinking enough to see the reality of just how much influence the corporatocracy has and how little power you have, then you are going to experience more pain than those who do not see these truths. To dull this pain, in addition to drugs and other diversions, human beings use depression and apathy. But these “shutdown strategies” weaken us and create passivity, immobilization and what Bob Marley called “mental slavery,” which in itself can be humiliatingly painful. And in this vicious cycle, human beings use even more diversions and shutdown strategies to dull this ever-increasing pain.

When one is in such a debilitating vicious cycle, painful truths about the cause of one’s malaise—the truths of how we are getting screwed—are not positively energizing. Instead, one may take such truths as confirmation that pessimism and hopelessness are warranted. The vicious cycle continues.

When one is already in pain and immobilized, there is a reflexive negative reaction to any proposed solution. Solutions demand effort, and a demand for effort is painful for those with little energy. So, it’s much easier to reflexively dismiss any solution. Of course, many solutions do deserve to be dismissed, as they may well be naïve.

The feeling of hopelessness is a legitimate one. And hopeless people are turned off by attempts to invalidate their feelings. Is it possible to validate that feeling of hopelessness while at the same time challenging the wisdom of inactions based on hopelessness? And is it possible to challenge it in a way that doesn’t insult the intelligence of critical thinkers?

Critical Thinking about Critical Thinking

The battle against the corporatocracy demands critical thinking, which results in seeing many ugly truths about reality. This critical thinking is absolutely necessary. Without it, one is more likely to engage in tactics that can make matters worse. Critical thinking also means the ability to think critically about one’s pessimism—realizing that pessimism can cripple the will. Critical thinkers who reflect on their own critical thinking recognize how negativism can cause inaction, which results in maintaining the status quo.

Critical thinking anti-authoritarians who move into hopelessness can forget that while they may in fact be better at seeing ugly truths than are many other people, they cannot see everything. Simply put, critical thinkers sometimes lose their humility.

Abraham Lincoln, considered by many historians to be our most critical thinking president, was also a major depressive. When he was a young man, he became so depressed that twice his friends had to form suicide watches for him. In the 1850s in the United States, the major battle was less over abolishing slavery than merely stopping the spread of it. Lincoln, who fought politically to stop the spread of slavery, wrote in 1856 a pessimistic analysis of the North’s chances of winning this fight:

This immense, palpable pecuniary interest, on the question of extending slavery, unites the Southern people, as one man. But it can not be demonstrated that the North will gain a dollar by restricting it. Moral principle is all, or nearly all, that unites us of the North. Pity ’tis, it is so, but this is a looser bond, than pecuniary interest. Right here is the plain cause of their perfect union and our want of it.

That slavery would be abolished in the United States less than a decade after Lincoln’s pessimistic analysis of the difficulty of merely stopping its spread was one of those seeming impossibilities that became possible because of unforeseen historical events. In the North, there was certainly not enough concern for African Americans to result in the end of slavery. But less than a decade after Lincoln’s pessimistic analysis about merely stopping the spread of slavery, one unforeseen event after another resulted in the abolition of slavery.

There are many examples from history of seeming impossibilities actually happening, examples that compel critical thinkers to rethink whether they are actually seeing all the possibilities. One recent example is, of course, the Arab spring. Many critical thinkers from that part of the world remain amazed at the huge revolts in Egypt that toppled the Mubarak tyranny.

The collapse of the Soviet empire seemed impossible to most Americans up until shortly before it occurred. Most Americans saw only mass resignation within the Soviet Union and its sphere of control. But the shipyard workers in Gdansk, Poland, did not see their Soviet and Communist Party rulers as the all-powerful forces that Americans did. And so Polish workers’ Solidarity, by simply refusing to go away, provided a strong dose of morale across Eastern Europe at the same time other historical events—such as the Soviet Union’s Afghanistan war—weakened their empire.

Why Not Just Wait for the Collapse?

History tells us that not just the Soviet empire but all empires ultimately collapse, and so why not just wait for their fall? It is pretty safe to say that the U.S. military-industrial complex and other oppressive U.S. industrial complexes will ultimately fall. These may be transformed by our own efforts or, more likely—given Americans’ current state of political passivity—they will fall owing mostly under the weight of their own stupidity. So, if it is more likely that these will fall under the weight of their own stupidity, why bother with activism?

One reason for democratic movements is that history tells us that not all empires and oppressive institutions fall under the weight of their own stupidity, as some are transformed by a combination of democratic movements and empire stupidity.

There is another reason to work each day on the democracy battlefields at our workplace, schools, the media, the marketplace, etc. Whether an empire and its oppressive institutions fall under the weight of their own stupidity or with help from a democratic movement, there must be people around in the aftermath who have what it takes to create and maintain a democratic society. There must be people who have retained their individual self-respect, collective self-confidence, courage, determination, anti-authoritarianism, and solidarity.

The lesson from history is that tyrannical and dehumanizing institutions are often more fragile than they appear. We never really know until it happens whether or not we are living in that time when historical variables are creating opportunities for seemingly impossible change. Maybe in our lifetime, or our kids’ lifetime, or their kids’ lifetime, the current corporatocracy will fall. It may fall because of the efforts of democratic movements or because of its own stupidity or some combination.

But when it does fall, the likelihood that it will be replaced by an enduring democratic society rests on whether there are enough of us with practice in democracy, enough of us who took seriously the psychological and cultural building blocks of self-respect, collective self-confidence, courage, determination, anti-authoritarianism, and solidarity. And democratic movements are the best place to practice creating those psychological and cultural building blocks required for an enduring democracy.

That's why "Occupy Wall Street" makes sense, and that's why I will be at "October 2011" at Freedom Plaza, Washington D.C. beginning next Thursday, October 6.

Bruce E. Levine is a clinical psychologist and author of Get Up, Stand Up: Uniting Populists, Energizing the Defeated, and Battling the Corporate Elite  (Chelsea Green, 2011). His Web site is www.brucelevine.net.

Source: AlterNet

Don’t Let MoveON, Working Families and Other “Veterans” Dilute Your Message #OccupyWallStreet!

Veteran agitators flock to Occupy Wall Street

City's biggest unions, community groups queue up to join the fight as young amateurs using Facebook and Twitter make more waves than the pros.

Source: Crains New York
 

Airline Pilots Protest on Wall Street

Denver Post,
Sep 27, 2011

Over 700 hundred Continental and United pilots, joined by additional pilots from other Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) carriers, demonstrate in front of Wall Street on September 27, 2011 in New York City. The pilots want to draw attention to the lack of progress on negotiations of the pilots’ joint collective bargaining agreement ahead of the one-year anniversary of the corporate merger close date of United and Continental airlines.

 

 

 

  title
 

 

Source: Denver Post (More photos at link.)

NYC Transit Union Joins Occupy Wall Street

Occupy Wall Street

By Matt Sledge
Huffington Post, September 29, 2011

New York City labor unions are preparing to back the unwieldy grassroots band occupying a park in Lower Manhattan, in a move that could mark a significant shift in the tenor of the anti-corporate Occupy Wall Street protests and send thousands more people into the streets.

The Transit Workers Union Local 100's executive committee, which oversees the organization of subway and bus workers, voted unanimously Wednesday night to support the protesters. The union claims 38,000 members. A union-backed organizing coalition, which orchestrated a large May 12 march on Wall Street before the protests, is planning a rally on Oct. 5 in explicit support. And SEIU 32BJ, which represents doormen, security guards and maintenance workers, is using its Oct. 12 rally to express solidarity with the Zuccotti Park protesters.

"The call went out over a month ago, before actually the occupancy of Wall Street took place," said 32BJ spokesman Kwame Patterson. Now, he added, "we're all coming under one cause, even though we have our different initiatives."

The protests found their genesis not in any of the established New York social action groups but with a call put out by a Canadian magazine. While other major unions beyond the TWU have yet to officially endorse Occupy Wall Street, more backing could come as early as this week. Both the New York Metro Area Postal Union and SEIU 1199 are considering such moves.

Jackie DiSalvo, an Occupy Wall Street organizer, says a series of public actions aimed at expressing support for labor -- from disrupting a Sotheby's auction on Sept. 22 to attending a postal workers' rally on Tuesday -- have convinced unions that the two groups' struggles are one.

"Labor is up against the wall and they're begging us to help them," said DiSalvo, a retired professor at Baruch College in her late 60s who has emerged as a driving force in the effort to link up labor and the protests. DiSalvo is herself a member of the Professional Staff Congress, which represents teachers at the City University of New York.

Recent anti-labor actions like Scott Walker's in Wisconsin "really shocked the unions and moved them into militant action," DiSalvo said, and the inflammatory video of a NYPD deputy inspector pepper-spraying several protesters on Saturday also generated union sympathy.

"There's a lot of good feeling. They've made a lot of friends," said Chuck Zlatkin of the postal union.

When a band of about 100 protesters showed up at a postal workers' rally featuring Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday, complete with purple hair and big drums, "they went a long way towards touching people and making connections," Zlatkin observed.

If unions move to support the protests in a major way, that could mean thousands more people marching in Lower Manhattan. Thus far the protesters have not managed to come near the 10,000 or so who attended the unrelated May 12 march on Wall Street. The Strong Economy for All Coalition, which receives support from the United Federation of Teachers, the Working Families Party, plus SEIU 32BJ and 1199, previously helped put together that demonstration. Now they will be rallying for the grassroots group.

"Their fight is our fight," director Michael Kink said. "They've chosen the right targets. We also want to see a society where folks other than the top 1 percent have a chance to say how things go."

Asked if the union support could dilute the message of the Occupy Wall Street protesters -- which has itself been dismissed as incoherent -- organizer DiSalvo said the rag tag group's stance would remain unchanged.

"Occupy Wall Street will not negotiate watering down its own message," she said, union support or not.

Source: Huffington Post
 

On October 6, Let’s Make a National Clamor for Peace

Participate in the Occupation Movement, Come to Freedom Plaza

By Robert Naiman
Truthout, September 29, 2011

On October 7, 2011, the United States will have been at war for ten years.

Let's mark the occasion by making a national clamor for peace so loud that Congress, the president and big media will have to pay attention.

October 7 happens to fall on a Friday this year. If you get to choose, Friday is not necessarily the most strategic day to make a national clamor for peace, because 1) Congress will likely not be in session; 2) Friday is, in general, a crummy day to try to get media attention; and 3) even if these two things weren't true or relevant, Friday is not a great day to try to hold public attention. People's thoughts are turning to the weekend and then the weekend erases the chalkboard.

Moreover, the press has to cover the anniversary of the war, but these stories are going to be largely written and produced before Friday. The default media narrative will be: America has lost interest in the wars, because of the economy and unemployment, because "the wars are already winding down," or some other story that journalists or editors will make up. We have to beat this default media narrative. To beat it, we need to get in front of it.

So, let's mark the occasion on Thursday, October 6. Let's have a national, "ecumenical" day of action for peace: to end the wars and cut the military budget.

By "ecumenical," I mean this: everybody will "worship" in their own way. People who are willing to call Congress, will call Congress. People are willing to go to demonstrations, will go to demonstrations. People who get active online, will get active online. But everybody who wants peace will do something for peace on October 6. In the comments below, tell us what you are going to do to act for peace on October 6.

Call Congress: right now, the Congressional "supercommittee" is considering proposals to cut the US government debt by $1.2 trillion over ten years. One obvious choice: end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and cut the military budget. Poll data shows that when you ask people "if the supercommittee cuts the budget, where should they cut?" military spending walks to victory. But the military contractors and war profiteers, who have grown fat from ten years of war spending, are pressing Congress not to cut the military budget and to cut your Medicare benefits instead. If you do nothing else for peace on October 6, call at least one of your representatives in Congress - particularly if they are on the supercommittee - and tell them to end the wars and cut the military budget. The Congressional switchboard is 202-225-3121.

In this speech on the budget, I explain why people who don't want Congress to cut domestic spending and want to save the hundreds of thousands of jobs threatened by domestic spending cuts should be pounding on the supercommittee to end the wars and cut the military budget:Demonstrate: on October 6, peace advocates will occupy Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC. All around the country, "occupy [city]" protests are already springing up in solidarity with the Wall Street protests. If you can get to one of these protests, go. On October 6, raise the banner of peace. If "occupying" isn't your cup of tea, have a vigil outside your representative or senator's office, or a federal building, or anyplace where you will be visible to the public. Send a press release to all local media the morning of the day before and call the local media and make sure they got your press release and are thinking of coming.

Here's an idea that might spark media interest: form a group called "Tea Party Patriots for Peace," demanding cuts to wasteful big government spending on war. (After all, war spending is the majority of federal discretionary spending.) Stop taxing us to pay for war!

Buzz it up online. On October 6, help "action for peace" be a focus of attention online. Blog and comment about actions taking place for peace; share writing about and coverage of actions for peace by others. Help it be the case that you can't look anywhere online on October 6 without seeing action for peace.

On Friday, October 7, don't let big media say that Americans aren't acting to press for peace. In the comments below, tell us what you are going to do to act for peace on October 6.

Source: Truthout

 

What’s behind the scorn for the Wall Street protests?

By Glenn Greenwald
Salon.com, September 29, 2011

 
It's unsurprising that establishment media outlets have been condescending, dismissive and scornful of the ongoing protests on Wall Street.  Any entity that declares itself an adversary of prevailing institutional power is going to be viewed with hostility by establishment-serving institutions and their loyalists.  That's just the nature of protests that take place outside approved channels, an inevitable by-product of disruptive dissent: those who are most vested in safeguarding and legitimizing establishment prerogatives (which, by definition, includes establishment media outlets) are going to be hostile to those challenges.  As the virtually universal disdain in these same circles for WikiLeaks (and, before that, for the Iraq War protests) demonstrated: the more effectively adversarial it is, the more establishment hostility it's going to provoke. 
 
Nor is it surprising that much of the most vocal criticisms of the Wall Street protests has come from some self-identified progressives, who one might think would be instinctively sympathetic to the substantive message of the protesters.  In an excellent analysis entitled "Why Establishment Media & the Power Elite Loathe Occupy Wall Street," Kevin Gosztola chronicles how much of the most scornful criticisms have come from Democratic partisans who -- like the politicians to whom they devote their fealty -- feign populist opposition to Wall Street for political gain.
 
Some of this anti-protest posturing is just the all-too-familiar New-Republic-ish eagerness to prove one's own Seriousness by castigating anyone to the left of, say, Dianne Feinstein or John Kerry; for such individuals, multi-term, pro-Iraq-War Democratic Senator-plutocrats define the outermost left-wing limit of respectability.  Also at play is the jingoistic notion that street protests are valid in Those Bad Contries but not in free, democratic America.
 
A siginificant aspect of this progressive disdain is grounded in the belief that the only valid form of political activism is support for Democratic Party candidates, and a corresponding desire to undermine anything that distracts from that goal.  Indeed, the loyalists of both parties have an interest in marginalizing anything that might serve as a vehicle for activism outside of fealty to one of the two parties (Fox News' firing of Glenn Beck was almost certainly motivated by his frequent deviation from the GOP party-line orthodoxy which Fox exists to foster).
 
The very idea that the one can effectively battle Wall Street's corruption and control by working for the Democratic Party is absurd on its face: Wall Street's favorite candidate in 2008 was Barack Obama, whose administration -- led by a Wall Street White House Chief of Staff and Wall-Street-subservient Treasury Secretary and filled to the brim with Goldman Sachs officials -- is now working hard to protect bankers from meaningful accountability (and though he's behind Wall Street's own Mitt Romney in the Wall Street cash sweepstakes this year, Obama is still doing well); one of Wall Street's most faithful servants is Chuck Schumer, the money man of the Democratic Party; and the second-ranking Senate Democrat acknowledged -- when Democrats controlled the Congress -- that the owners of Congress are bankers.  There are individuals who impressively rail against the crony capitalism and corporatism that sustains Wall Street's power, but they're no match for the party apparatus that remains fully owned and controlled by it.
 
But much of this progressive criticism consists of relatively (ostensibly) well-intentioned tactical and organizational critiques of the protests: there wasn't a clear unified message; it lacked a coherent media strategy; the neo-hippie participants were too off-putting to Middle America; the resulting police brutality overwhelmed the message, etc. etc.  That's the high-minded form which most progressive scorn for the protests took: it's just not professionally organized or effective.
 
Some of these critiques are ludicrous.  Does anyone really not know what the basic message is of this protest: that Wall Street is oozing corruption and criminality and its unrestrained political power -- in the form of crony capitalism and ownership of political institutions -- is destroying financial security for everyone else?  Beyond that, criticizing protesters for the prominence of police brutality stories is pure victim-blaming (and, independently, having police brutality highlighted is its own benefit).
 
Most importantly, very few protest movements enjoy perfect clarity about tactics or command widespread support when they begin; they're designed to spark conversation, raise awareness, attract others to the cause, and build those structural planks as they grow and develop.  Dismissing these incipient protests because they lack fully developed, sophisticated professionalization is akin to pronouncing a three-year-old child worthless because he can't read Schopenhauer: those who are actually interested in helping it develop will work toward improving those deficiencies, not harp on them in order to belittle its worth.
 
That said, some of these organizational/tactical critiques are valid enough as far as they go; the protests could probably be more effective with some more imaginative, concerted and savvy organizational strategies. The problem is these criticisms don't go very far -- at all.
 
* * * * *
 
There's a vast and growing apparatus of intimidation designed to deter and control citizen protests.  The most that's allowed is to assemble with the permission of state authorities and remain roped off in sequestered, out-of-the-way areas: the Orwellian-named free speech zones.  Anything that is even remotely disruptive or threatening is going to be met with aggressive force: pepper spray, mass arrests by highly militarized urban police forces, and aggressive prosecutions.  Recall the wild excesses of force in connection with the 2008 RNC Convention in Minneapolis (I reported on those firsthand); the overzealous prosecutions of civil disobedience activists like Aaron Swartz, environmentalist Tim DeChristopher, and Dan Choi; the war being waged on whistleblowers for the crime of exposing high-level wrongdoing; or the treatment of these Wall Street protesters.
 
Financial elites and their political servants are well aware that exploding wealth inequality, pervasive economic anxiety, and increasing hostility toward institutions of authority (and corresponding realization that voting fixes very little of this) are likely to bring London-style unrest -- and worse -- to American soil; it was just two weeks ago that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg warned that the unemployment crisis could trigger "riots."  Even the complacent American citizenry -- well-trained in learned impotence and acquiescence to (even reverence for) those most responsible for their plight -- is going to reach a tipping point of unrest.  There are numerous weapons of surveillance and coercion that have been developed over the last decade in anticipation of that unrest: most of it justified in the name of Terrorism, but all of it featuring decidedly dual-use domestic capability (illustrating what I mean is this chart showing how extensively the Patriot Act has been used in non-Terrorist cases, and how rarely it has been used for Terrorism).
 
In sum, there is a sprawling apparatus of federal and local militarized police forces and private corporate security designed to send this message: if you participate in protests or other forms of dissent outside of harmless approved channels, you're going to be harmed in numerous ways.  As Yves Smith put it this week:
I’m beginning to wonder whether the right to assemble is effectively dead in the US. No one who is a wage slave (which is the overwhelming majority of the population) can afford to have an arrest record, even a misdemeanor, in this age of short job tenures and rising use of background checks.
This is all designed to deter any meaningful challenges to the government and corporate institutions which are suffocating them, to bully those who consider such challenges into accepting its futility.  And it works.  In an excellent essay on the Wall Street protests, Dennis Perrin writes:
 
The dissident children were easily, roughly swept aside. Their hearts are in a good place. Their bodies a minor nuisance. They'll stream back to prove their resolve. And they'll get pepper sprayed and beaten down again. And again.
I admire these kids. They're off their asses. Agitating. Arguing. Providing a living example. There's passion and feeling in their dissent. They're willing to be punished. It's easy to mock them, but how many of you would take their place? . . .
 
Yet I have doubts. The class war from above demoralizes as much as it incites. Countless people have surrendered. Faded from view. To demonstrate or occupy corporate turf doesn't seem like a wise option. You'll get beaten and arrested. For what? Making mortgage payments is tough enough.
Given the costs and risks one incurs from participating in protests like this -- to say nothing of the widespread mockery one receives --  it's natural that most of the participants will be young and not yet desperate to cling to institutional stability.  It's also natural that this cohort won't be well-versed (or even interested) in the high arts of media messaging and leadership structures.  Democratic Party precinct captains, MBA students in management theory and corporate communications, and campaign media strategists aren't the ones who will fuel protests like this; it takes a mindset of passionate dissent and a willingness to remove oneself from the safe confines of institutional respectability.
 
So, yes, the people willing to engage in protests like these at the start may lack (or reject the need for) media strategies, organizational hierarchies, and messaging theories.  But they're among the very few people trying to channel widespread anger into activism rather than resignation, and thus deserve support and encouragement -- and help -- from anyone claiming to be sympathetic to their underlying message.  As Perrin put it:
This part of Michigan [where I live] was once militant. From organized labor to student agitation. Now there's nothing. Shop after shop goes under. Strip malls abandoned. Legalized loan shark parlors spread. Dollar stores hang on. Parking lots riots of weeds. Roads in serious disrepair. Those with jobs feel lucky to be employed. Everyone else is on their own. A general resignation prevails. Life limps by.
Personally, I think there's substantial value even in those protests that lack "exit goals" and "messaging strategies" and the rest of the platitudes from Power Point presentations by mid-level functionaries at corporate conferences.  Some injustices simply need anger and dissent expressed for its own sake, to make clear that there are citizens who are aware of it and do not accept it.
 
In Vancouver yesterday, Dick Cheney was met by angry protests chanting "war criminal" at him while he tried to hawk his book, which prompted arrests and an ugly-for-Canada police battle that then became part of the story of his visit.  Is that likely to result in Cheney's arrest or sway huge numbers of people to change how they think?  No.  But it's vastly preferable to allowing him to traipse around the world as though he's a respectable figure unaccompanied by anger over his crimes -- anger necessarily expressed outside of the institutions that have failed to check or punish (but rather have shielded and legitimized) those crimes.  And the same is true of Wall Street's rampant criminality.
 
But for those who believe that protests are only worthwhile if they translate into quantifiable impact: the lack of organizational sophistication or messaging efficacy on the part of the Wall Street protest is a reason to support it and get involved in it, not turn one's nose up at it and join in the media demonization.  That's what one actually sympathetic to its messaging (rather than pretending to be in order more effectively to discredit it) would do.  Anyone who looks at mostly young citizens marching in the street protesting the corruption of Wall Street and the harm it spawns, and decides that what is warranted is mockery and scorn rather than support, is either not seeing things clearly or is motivated by objectives other than the ones being presented.
 
Read more at Salon.com
 


Glenn Greenwald was previously a constitutional law and civil rights litigator in New York. He is the author of the New York Times Bestselling book "How Would a Patriot Act?," a critique of the Bush administration's use of executive power, released in May 2006. His second book, "A Tragic Legacy", examines the Bush legacy. His next book is titled "With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful."

Radio Discussion of “Occupy” Movement and October2011

 

Here's my appearance on the Peter B. Collins Show. He is always a great interview because he comes to the show very prepared. He pays me a very nice compliment at the end of the segment.

KZ

http://peterbcollins.com/2011/09/28/wall-st-protests-get-traction-dc-protest-starts-october-6-journalist-joby-warrick-recreates-december-2009-attack-at-khost/

Wall St. Protests Get Traction, DC Protest Starts October 6; Journalist Joby Warrick Recreates December 2009 Attack at Khost

by Peter B. Collins on September 28, 2011

Activist Kevin Zeese is back, with updates on the Wall Street protests and the heavy-handed police tactics that, perversely, are causing the media to actually start covering the protest.  Zeese also details plans for a major protest in Washington starting October 6, the 10th anniversary of our invasion of Afghanistan.  Joby Warrick of The Washington Post talks about his new book, The Triple Agent.

Zeese is an attorney and activist involved in many causes, and we focus on the now-12-day action on Wall Street.  Initially ignored by the mainstream media, Michael Moore and others have managed to penetrate the corporate media filter to get the news out.  Get more about Wall St. protests here, or click here to find activists near you.  Zeese also tells us about the plans for the action in Washington that starts on October 6.  If you can’t be in DC, go to the blog page for ways you can be involved.

NYC Police and DA Investigating Abusive Police Commander Bologna

Investigating Bologna Needs Constant People Pressure
Police Chief Should Remove Him From Duty NOW!

We'll see how law enforcement investigating itself will go.  Officer Bologna has gotten away with abuse before.  He knows how the game is played.  It will take a lot of consistent public pressure to change the rules of the "protect the cops" game that is all to common.  Getting the police to reverse themselves is a good first step, but pressure needs to continue.  Bad police like Bologna are bad for all the police.  A sensible police chief would relieve him from his duties and tell him to start planning his retirement.  We'll see if the famous police chief Raymond Kelly does what he should do.

KZ

New York City officials have reversed themselves and announced two  investigations - by the police department and the D.A.'s office - into the egregious pepper spray attack on Wall Street protesters by NYPD cop Anthony Bologna. Even while noting that a second, equally incriminating video of Bologna randomly macing bystanders had surfaced, the Times story was full of bet-hedging and back-pedalling; that, and history, do not bode well for a just outcome.

Source: Common Dreams

 

Occupying Both Heads of the Beast

Inspired by protests like the one above in Tahrir Square, a new occupation will be launched on October 6th in Washington, DC. (photo: Getty Images)
Inspired by protests like the one above in Tahrir Square, a new occupation will be launched on October 6th in Washington, DC. (photo: Getty Images)
 

Synergy Between Wall Street and DC's Freedom Plaza Occupations

By Scott Galindez,
Reader Supported News, September 27, 2011

RSN Special Coverage: Occupy Wall Street

ith the Occupation of Wall Street in its second week, solidarity actions are popping up around the country and the world. Cities currently supporting Occupy Wall Street are: Madrid, Spain; San Francisco, California; Los Angeles, California; Toronto, Canada; London, England; Athens, Greece; Sydney, Australia; Stuttgart, Germany; Tokyo, Japan; Milan, Italy; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Algiers, Algeria; Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel; Portland, Oregon; and Chicago, Illinois.

Cities in the process of joining Occupy Wall Street are: Phoenix, Arizona; Montreal, Canada; Cleveland, Ohio; Atlanta, Georgia; Kansas City, Missouri; Seattle, Washington; and Orlando, Florida.

All of those actions were directly inspired by Occupy Wall Street.

Another occupation will begin next week in Washington, DC.

A press release from the October2011 coalition announced that "... the People's Uprisings seen around the world and in the United States will come to Washington, DC beginning on Thursday, October 6 when thousands will converge to begin a prolonged people's occupation of Freedom Plaza." The release claimed they were building on Arab Spring, European Summer, Madison and the Occupation of Wall Street.

The Freedom Plaza Occupation will demand that the government represent the people, not just the top 1%. The pledge, signed by thousands, calls for using our resources on human needs and environmental protection, not for war and exploitation. The October2011 coalition stands with the American people on seven key issues:

  • Tax the rich and corporations


  • End the wars, bring the troops home, cut military spending


  • Protect the social safety net, strengthen Social Security and improved Medicare for all


  • End corporate welfare for oil companies and other big business interests


  • Transition to a clean energy economy, reverse environmental degradation


  • Protect worker rights including collective bargaining, create jobs and raise wages


  • Get money out of politics

Some may wonder ... why not join the Wall Street Occupation instead of opening up another front? Kevin Zeese from the October2011 coalition addressed that question: "We have both cross-endorsed our events and see them as synergistic. If you look at the October2011.org website we provide a lot of coverage to the Wall Street occupation, including urging people to attend and support it. Our core organizers attended many of their planning meetings and have been involved with the occupation. Three of our key people were interviewed Sunday, Chris Hedges, Medea Benjamin and Debra Sweet, and a bunch more were in the Plaza. We are mutually supportive of each other."

Both of these actions have their own strengths. Occupy Wall Street was more spontaneous. Nobody knew what to expect, nobody knew who would show up, or how long they would stay. The culture-jamming online magazine Adbusters issued the call, but did not organize the event.

One thing you hear often at the Wall Street protest is people saying that they were inspired by Tahrir Square, and didn't want the usual marches with the same talking heads that end with everyone going back to their normal lives and supporting the status quo.

They have established a close-knit community that is interdependent on each other. You hear talk of establishing a new way to build a movement; one that is inclusive and without powerful leaders. To say there are no leaders, however, is not the case. In all communities people step up and provide leadership. Those people become leaders by earning respect.

Decisions in Liberty Plaza are made by the "General Assembly" on a consensus basis. The result is everyone has a role in the decision and everyone can provide leadership in the implementation. While it can be tedious to reach a consensus, the result is a decision that everyone can get behind.

Occupy DC will be powerful in its own right but will have a different dynamic. Organizing and planning has been underway for months. There will be permits, a stage with a sound system, a medical tent, media tent and a shantytown. The National Park Service has already warned them that sleeping will not be allowed, but Zeese said the first Assembly on the 6th will discuss whether or not to comply.

As a veteran of large protests in Washington I hope that large numbers decide to sleep in the park. My guess is if only a few dozen or so decide to take a stand, the Park Police will enforce the camping regulation, but if hundreds "sleep in" they will likely back off.

In Washington there will be experienced protesters and organizers who sometimes get caught repeating bad habits. Let us hope they are watching Wall Street very closely and learning that there are no right or wrong ways to organize. Spontaneity, creativity, and imagination can sometimes be more effective than planning and preparation, but both have their place and can complement each other nicely.


Scott Galindez is the Political Director of Reader Supported News, and the co-founder of Truthout.

Source: Reader Supported News

Grandmother Walks From West Virginia to D.C. for Oct. 6 Protest

“If I can do this, anybody can get in a car and do this.”


Carrie Stone begins her journey to D.C. from Wallace, West Virginia

“If you are tired of waiting for politicians to fix what’s wrong & if you believe our policies are going in the WRONG direction, here is your chance to join with thousands of other Americans to DO something besides complain,” writes Carrie Stone, a 56-year-old gay grandmother and cancer survivor who has begun a 200-mile trek to D.C.

Stone started her walk from her hometown of Wallace, West Virginia on Sept. 26 and she’s scheduled to arrive in D.C. on Oct. 5. (You can follow her progress along the C&O Trail on Facebook, Twitter @papercrete, and her website.) She explained the significance of the timing of her arrival: “Beginning on Oct. 6, 2011, people are going to start occupying Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC. There we will stay indefinitely until something changes.”

“If I can do this, anybody can get in a car and do this,” Stone said in a phone conversation the day before her departure. “I want to inspire people to get involved. People think they’re too busy. I’m too busy, too… [but] this is so important. It’s more important than anything.”

When I reached out to Stone earlier this month, I didn’t know about her upcoming journey, or her past ones. Ever since TheFightBack began last year, I’ve had this idea to do a profile of our 500th Facebook friend.

The route from West Virginia to Washington DC

When we reached the milestone, I contacted the “lucky winner,” one Carrie Stone, and asked if I could interview her. “Sounds great,” she replied via Facebook. “My partner & I have quite the story to tell.” She wasn’t kidding.

In her second Facebook message, Stone laid out some of the life events that brought her to the decision to walk to D.C.

As for background info, Elisia & I are LGBT activists and have (officially) been involved in the struggle for equal legal rights for LGBT couples ever since Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. Shortly after DOMA was passed, we started Rainbow Law, a first of its kind legal document resource for our community. There we provide free advance directives and affordable document packages that allow partners to give each other rights and responsibilities that would otherwise be denied.

And because we understand these documents are very limited, our primary mission is to advocate for equal marriage rights for all LGBT Americans in every state. That is why we rode our bicycles across the country – twice – to advocate for marriage equality. We did so 1st in 2003 and again in 2004 while George Bush was pushing Congress to amend the Constitution to ban “gay marriage.” A documentary film called “Lesbian Grandmothers from Mars” was made and released right before the 2004 election. There is a trailer on YouTube. We are planning one more ride in 2013 – 10 years after the first ride.

After we ended the last ride we sold our house, quit our jobs and moved to West Virginia where we bought a small piece of land and started building a house out of recycled materials (builtfromtrash.com), like newspaper (papercrete), bottles, cans and tires.

We’ve just about finished the house and now have 4 goats, 6 chickens & 3 organic gardens. We are currently making our own solar panels (bought the parts on Ebay), a home-made windmill and a mini-hydroelectric generator. All of these (plus a generator made from an old stationary bike) are used to charge a bank of batteries so that we will eventually get off the power grid.

So, all of this sounds wonderful, right? Well, as it turns out, the oil & gas industry discovered we are living over top a mother lode of natural gas embedded in a layer of shale rock. Halliburton invented a wonderful way to extract that gas by hydraulic fracturing — in other words, by drilling down to and then horizontally through the shale and blasting it with a high pressure liquid which contains all sorts of toxins. Not only is this depleting local water supplies, it is causing methane gas to seep into the water wells AND it creates a toxic waste from the drilling fluid that is difficult to dispose of.

On top of all of that, as an uninsured cancer survivor, I struggle with no health care.

Needless to say, all of the above makes us almost a poster child for what ails this country today.

We had such hope when Obama was elected, but now see that we – the American people – need to take matters into our own hands. Our elected officials are clearly representing the 1% of the population who control the money while ignoring the other 99%. I may not be a mathematician but it is clear to me that – even if we get a fraction of people affected by these harmful policies (austerity measures, cutting education & government assistance, etc. while at the same time wasting billions in Iraq & Afghanistan and on giving welfare to wealthy corporations) – we will scare the sh** out of them.

http://thefightback.org/2011/09/grandmother-walks-from-west-virginia-to-d-c-for-oct-6-protest/

Urgent End Of Year Fundraising Campaign

Online donations are back! Keep independent media alive. 

Due to the attacks on our fiscal sponsor, we were unable to raise funds online for nearly two years.  As the bills pile up, your help is needed now to cover the monthly costs of operating Popular Resistance.

Urgent End Of Year Fundraising Campaign

Online donations are back! 

Keep independent media alive. 

Due to the attacks on our fiscal sponsor, we were unable to raise funds online for nearly two years.  As the bills pile up, your help is needed now to cover the monthly costs of operating Popular Resistance.

Sign Up To Our Daily Digest

Independent media outlets are being suppressed and dropped by corporations like Google, Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for our daily email digest before it’s too late so you don’t miss the latest movement news.