The state Education Department is in the final stages of creating a system to share student data with colleges and a half-dozen other state agencies so that New Yorkers can be tracked from preschool to college to the workforce and, potentially, “throughout their lives.” As education reformers push the power of data analysis, state officials say the new system will let researchers find the keys to student achievement and failure. What does prekindergarten background say about the likelihood of success in high school Advanced Placement classes? How did college students who fail science do in middle school? What are the links between applying for unemployment benefits as an adult and one’s educational history?
“The only purpose of this work is to get information that can make our education programs better,” said associate education commissioner Ken Wagner, who is leading the initiative. “We want to learn the types of courses that kids do well in that will predict success in college and the workforce.”
But this is a time of growing public anxiety about the use and security of data. Many educators and parents have railed against the state’s separate plans to send identifiable student data to the privately run inBloom cloud for storage and controlled public use. Critics say the Education Department’s little-known plans to share data with other agencies — known as P-20 –raise all sorts of concerns about how closely government should be following citizens’ lives.
“This throws up so many red flags for me as a parent, a tech guy and an educator,” said Brian Wasson, a technology training specialist at St. Joseph’s College on Long Island who has used his Twitter account to urge that attention be paid
to P-20. “As this develops, will they decide to use this data for more than research? I don’t buy the rationale for it.”
The state Education Department has been working on P-20, which refers to the period between prekindergarten and entry into the workforce, since at least 2008. The costs are difficult to separate, but the department has gotten more than $40 million in federal and state grants to expand its data systems.
New York is hardly alone. Forty-four states are synching data between schools and colleges, and 19 have connected workforce data, according to the Data Quality Campaign…
The federal government has pushed the development of P-20 systems through Race to the Top, stimulus grants and other programs.
“Data is painting a profile of a student that is richer and more valuable than ever before,” Jim Shelton, a U.S. Education Department official who previously worked for the pro-data Gates Foundation, said in a recent call with journalists.
He said government has to ensure that data are used responsibly, but that doing so is a “small price for progress.”
At least some of the shared data will include students’ names. A 2011 state filing with the federal government also talks about agencies sharing common identification numbers that will “follow individuals throughout their lives.”
“It’s the same conversation as with inBloom. Why are they doing this? What’s the purpose? Why do they need students’ names?” Pleasantville Superintendent Mary Fox-Alter said. “Do we need to share information about 5-year-olds with colleges? Unbelievable.”
Activist Leonie Haimson, who has rallied national opposition to the inBloom project, said there is no way to know how government agencies really will use such long-term data.
“It adds to the suspicion that there is a surveillance state tracking kids,” she said. “We’re not against research, but there have to be strict controls on who can be trusted with the information.”
… Paige Kowalski, director of state policy for the Data Quality Campaign, a nonprofit group funded by the Gates Foundation and others to promote the use of data in education, said states have to be clear and transparent about how their P-20 systems will work. (emphasis added)
“I very much understand the fears out there,” Kowalski said. “You see a lot of confusion without transparency. You have to explain that there are certain things you cannot know unless you follow kids from pre-K to post-secondary education.”
… Assemblyman Thomas Abinanti, D-Mount Pleasant, who was made aware of P-20 by Wasson, said he couldn’t fathom why education officials would build a “student profiling” system.
“This is a total misuse of government,” he said. “This is Big Brother come home to New York.”
