The California Highway Patrol has concluded a plainclothes officer acted within department policy when he drew his gun without identifying himself and aimed it at protesters during a scuffle when he and his partner were unmasked during an anti-police brutality protest in December.
The unnamed officer was found to be justified for drawing his gun and aiming it at everyone present after his partner wrestled with a protester who struck him on Dec. 10. The investigation concluded about three weeks ago.
Despite the obvious error of having CHP Officers armed and undercover, walking amongst an anti-police brutality protest while instigating violence and vandalism along the way being the flawed behavior. Avery Browne, chief of the CHP’s Golden Gate Division says: “Was it unnerving? Yes. Shocking? Yes,”. “We take that seriously when there’s a display of a firearm, but had he not done that, today we might be having a different discussion. “He saved his partner’s life and other citizens that were there, too.”
Had these two officers not been dispatched to covertly surveil and instigate the march eventually leading to protester suspicion and the officers unmasking, this violent chain of events would have never occurred.
The officer and his partner were dressed in plainclothes and followed the protest part of the way in their car, then went on foot from downtown Oakland toward Lake Merritt. Around 27th Street, some protesters became suspicious that the two men were police, not protesters, and at least one person attempted to pull off the handkerchiefs the officers were using to hide their faces & identities. The officer told his superiors he drew his weapon out of fear when his partner wrestled with a protester and a crowd began to close in around them.
In a response to Johnson’s complaint, a CHP captain wrote to Johnson: “The California Highway Patrol maintains the highest level of expectations from our employees. I hope that if you should have any future contact with a member of this department it will be under more favorable circumstances.”Browne said the investigation included statements from witnesses and review of surveillance footage. Browne, who defended the officers’ actions from the beginning, said their actions were appropriate since they felt threatened and were outnumbered by protesters. The officers remained on active duty after the incident.